Cargando…

What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study

[Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gérard, Emilie F., Yadav, Vishal, Goldberg, David P., de Visser, Sam P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375
_version_ 1784734347900747776
author Gérard, Emilie F.
Yadav, Vishal
Goldberg, David P.
de Visser, Sam P.
author_facet Gérard, Emilie F.
Yadav, Vishal
Goldberg, David P.
de Visser, Sam P.
author_sort Gérard, Emilie F.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH) intermediate in nonheme iron hydroxylases transfers OH(•) to give alcohol product, whereas the halogenases transfer X(•) to the carbon radical substrate. There remains significant debate regarding what factors control their remarkable selectivity of the halogenases. The reactivity of the complexes Fe(III)(BNPA(Ph2)O)(OH)(X) (X = Cl, Br) with a secondary carbon radical (R(•)) is described. It is found that X(•) transfer occurs with a secondary carbon radical, as opposed to OH(•) transfer with tertiary radicals. Comprehensive computational studies involving density functional theory were carried out to examine the possible origins of this selectivity. The calculations reproduce the experimental findings, which indicate that halogen transfer is not observed for the tertiary radicals because of a nonproductive equilibrium that results from the endergonic nature of these reactions, despite a potentially lower reaction barrier for the halogenation pathway. In contrast, halogen transfer is favored for secondary carbon radicals, for which the halogenated product complex is thermodynamically more stable than the reactant complex. These results are rationalized by considering the relative strengths of the C–X bonds that are formed for tertiary versus secondary carbon centers. The computational analysis also shows that the reaction barrier for halogen transfer is significantly dependent on secondary coordination sphere effects, including steric and H-bonding interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9228086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92280862022-06-25 What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study Gérard, Emilie F. Yadav, Vishal Goldberg, David P. de Visser, Sam P. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH) intermediate in nonheme iron hydroxylases transfers OH(•) to give alcohol product, whereas the halogenases transfer X(•) to the carbon radical substrate. There remains significant debate regarding what factors control their remarkable selectivity of the halogenases. The reactivity of the complexes Fe(III)(BNPA(Ph2)O)(OH)(X) (X = Cl, Br) with a secondary carbon radical (R(•)) is described. It is found that X(•) transfer occurs with a secondary carbon radical, as opposed to OH(•) transfer with tertiary radicals. Comprehensive computational studies involving density functional theory were carried out to examine the possible origins of this selectivity. The calculations reproduce the experimental findings, which indicate that halogen transfer is not observed for the tertiary radicals because of a nonproductive equilibrium that results from the endergonic nature of these reactions, despite a potentially lower reaction barrier for the halogenation pathway. In contrast, halogen transfer is favored for secondary carbon radicals, for which the halogenated product complex is thermodynamically more stable than the reactant complex. These results are rationalized by considering the relative strengths of the C–X bonds that are formed for tertiary versus secondary carbon centers. The computational analysis also shows that the reaction barrier for halogen transfer is significantly dependent on secondary coordination sphere effects, including steric and H-bonding interactions. American Chemical Society 2022-05-10 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9228086/ /pubmed/35537044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Gérard, Emilie F.
Yadav, Vishal
Goldberg, David P.
de Visser, Sam P.
What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title_full What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title_fullStr What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title_full_unstemmed What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title_short What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
title_sort what drives radical halogenation versus hydroxylation in mononuclear nonheme iron complexes? a combined experimental and computational study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375
work_keys_str_mv AT gerardemilief whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy
AT yadavvishal whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy
AT goldbergdavidp whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy
AT devissersamp whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy