Cargando…
What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study
[Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375 |
_version_ | 1784734347900747776 |
---|---|
author | Gérard, Emilie F. Yadav, Vishal Goldberg, David P. de Visser, Sam P. |
author_facet | Gérard, Emilie F. Yadav, Vishal Goldberg, David P. de Visser, Sam P. |
author_sort | Gérard, Emilie F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH) intermediate in nonheme iron hydroxylases transfers OH(•) to give alcohol product, whereas the halogenases transfer X(•) to the carbon radical substrate. There remains significant debate regarding what factors control their remarkable selectivity of the halogenases. The reactivity of the complexes Fe(III)(BNPA(Ph2)O)(OH)(X) (X = Cl, Br) with a secondary carbon radical (R(•)) is described. It is found that X(•) transfer occurs with a secondary carbon radical, as opposed to OH(•) transfer with tertiary radicals. Comprehensive computational studies involving density functional theory were carried out to examine the possible origins of this selectivity. The calculations reproduce the experimental findings, which indicate that halogen transfer is not observed for the tertiary radicals because of a nonproductive equilibrium that results from the endergonic nature of these reactions, despite a potentially lower reaction barrier for the halogenation pathway. In contrast, halogen transfer is favored for secondary carbon radicals, for which the halogenated product complex is thermodynamically more stable than the reactant complex. These results are rationalized by considering the relative strengths of the C–X bonds that are formed for tertiary versus secondary carbon centers. The computational analysis also shows that the reaction barrier for halogen transfer is significantly dependent on secondary coordination sphere effects, including steric and H-bonding interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9228086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92280862022-06-25 What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study Gérard, Emilie F. Yadav, Vishal Goldberg, David P. de Visser, Sam P. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C–H bond of a substrate to convert it into C–X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an Fe(III)(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous Fe(III)(OH) intermediate in nonheme iron hydroxylases transfers OH(•) to give alcohol product, whereas the halogenases transfer X(•) to the carbon radical substrate. There remains significant debate regarding what factors control their remarkable selectivity of the halogenases. The reactivity of the complexes Fe(III)(BNPA(Ph2)O)(OH)(X) (X = Cl, Br) with a secondary carbon radical (R(•)) is described. It is found that X(•) transfer occurs with a secondary carbon radical, as opposed to OH(•) transfer with tertiary radicals. Comprehensive computational studies involving density functional theory were carried out to examine the possible origins of this selectivity. The calculations reproduce the experimental findings, which indicate that halogen transfer is not observed for the tertiary radicals because of a nonproductive equilibrium that results from the endergonic nature of these reactions, despite a potentially lower reaction barrier for the halogenation pathway. In contrast, halogen transfer is favored for secondary carbon radicals, for which the halogenated product complex is thermodynamically more stable than the reactant complex. These results are rationalized by considering the relative strengths of the C–X bonds that are formed for tertiary versus secondary carbon centers. The computational analysis also shows that the reaction barrier for halogen transfer is significantly dependent on secondary coordination sphere effects, including steric and H-bonding interactions. American Chemical Society 2022-05-10 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9228086/ /pubmed/35537044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Gérard, Emilie F. Yadav, Vishal Goldberg, David P. de Visser, Sam P. What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study |
title | What
Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation
in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental
and Computational Study |
title_full | What
Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation
in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental
and Computational Study |
title_fullStr | What
Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation
in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental
and Computational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | What
Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation
in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental
and Computational Study |
title_short | What
Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation
in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental
and Computational Study |
title_sort | what
drives radical halogenation versus hydroxylation
in mononuclear nonheme iron complexes? a combined experimental
and computational study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerardemilief whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy AT yadavvishal whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy AT goldbergdavidp whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy AT devissersamp whatdrivesradicalhalogenationversushydroxylationinmononuclearnonhemeironcomplexesacombinedexperimentalandcomputationalstudy |