Cargando…
Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study
Background: The phase angle (PhA) can be used for prognostic assessments in critically ill patients. This study describes the perioperative course of PhA and associated risk indicators in a cohort of elective cardiac surgical patients. Methods: The PhA was measured in 168 patients once daily until p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14122491 |
_version_ | 1784734359196008448 |
---|---|
author | Ryz, Sylvia Nixdorf, Larissa Puchinger, Jürgen Lassnigg, Andrea Wiedemann, Dominik Bernardi, Martin H. |
author_facet | Ryz, Sylvia Nixdorf, Larissa Puchinger, Jürgen Lassnigg, Andrea Wiedemann, Dominik Bernardi, Martin H. |
author_sort | Ryz, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The phase angle (PhA) can be used for prognostic assessments in critically ill patients. This study describes the perioperative course of PhA and associated risk indicators in a cohort of elective cardiac surgical patients. Methods: The PhA was measured in 168 patients once daily until postoperative day (POD) seven. Patients were split into two groups depending on their median preoperative PhA and analyzed for several clinical outcomes; logistic regression models were used. Results: The PhA decreased from preoperative (6.1° ± 1.9°) to a nadir on POD 2 (3.5° ± 2.5°, mean difference −2.6° (95% CI, −3.0°; −2.1°; p < 0.0001)). Patients with lower preoperative PhA were older (71.0 ± 9.1 vs. 60.9 ± 12.0 years; p < 0.0001) and frailer (3.1 ± 1.3 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1; p < 0.0001), needed more fluids (8388 ± 3168 vs. 7417 ± 2459 mL, p = 0.0287), and stayed longer in the ICU (3.7 ± 4.5 vs. 2.6 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.0182). Preoperative PhA was independently influenced by frailty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61; 0.98; p = 0.0344) and cardiac function (OR 1.85; 95%CI 1.07; 3.19; p = 0.028), whereas the postoperative PhA decline was independently influenced by higher fluid balances (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75; 0.99; p = 0.0371) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98; 0.99; p = 0.0344). Conclusion: Perioperative PhA measurement is an easy-to-use bedside method that may critically influence risk evaluation for the outcome of cardiac surgery patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9228129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92281292022-06-25 Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study Ryz, Sylvia Nixdorf, Larissa Puchinger, Jürgen Lassnigg, Andrea Wiedemann, Dominik Bernardi, Martin H. Nutrients Article Background: The phase angle (PhA) can be used for prognostic assessments in critically ill patients. This study describes the perioperative course of PhA and associated risk indicators in a cohort of elective cardiac surgical patients. Methods: The PhA was measured in 168 patients once daily until postoperative day (POD) seven. Patients were split into two groups depending on their median preoperative PhA and analyzed for several clinical outcomes; logistic regression models were used. Results: The PhA decreased from preoperative (6.1° ± 1.9°) to a nadir on POD 2 (3.5° ± 2.5°, mean difference −2.6° (95% CI, −3.0°; −2.1°; p < 0.0001)). Patients with lower preoperative PhA were older (71.0 ± 9.1 vs. 60.9 ± 12.0 years; p < 0.0001) and frailer (3.1 ± 1.3 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1; p < 0.0001), needed more fluids (8388 ± 3168 vs. 7417 ± 2459 mL, p = 0.0287), and stayed longer in the ICU (3.7 ± 4.5 vs. 2.6 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.0182). Preoperative PhA was independently influenced by frailty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61; 0.98; p = 0.0344) and cardiac function (OR 1.85; 95%CI 1.07; 3.19; p = 0.028), whereas the postoperative PhA decline was independently influenced by higher fluid balances (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75; 0.99; p = 0.0371) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98; 0.99; p = 0.0344). Conclusion: Perioperative PhA measurement is an easy-to-use bedside method that may critically influence risk evaluation for the outcome of cardiac surgery patients. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9228129/ /pubmed/35745221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14122491 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ryz, Sylvia Nixdorf, Larissa Puchinger, Jürgen Lassnigg, Andrea Wiedemann, Dominik Bernardi, Martin H. Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Preoperative Phase Angle as a Risk Indicator in Cardiac Surgery—A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | preoperative phase angle as a risk indicator in cardiac surgery—a prospective observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14122491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryzsylvia preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT nixdorflarissa preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT puchingerjurgen preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT lassniggandrea preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT wiedemanndominik preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT bernardimartinh preoperativephaseangleasariskindicatorincardiacsurgeryaprospectiveobservationalstudy |