Cargando…

Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques

Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yongjian, Zhang, Qizhi, Kamiński, Paweł, Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk, Sufian, Muhammad, Dyczko, Artur, Kahla, Nabil Ben, Atig, Miniar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744270
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209
_version_ 1784734378268557312
author Li, Yongjian
Zhang, Qizhi
Kamiński, Paweł
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
Sufian, Muhammad
Dyczko, Artur
Kahla, Nabil Ben
Atig, Miniar
author_facet Li, Yongjian
Zhang, Qizhi
Kamiński, Paweł
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
Sufian, Muhammad
Dyczko, Artur
Kahla, Nabil Ben
Atig, Miniar
author_sort Li, Yongjian
collection PubMed
description Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), machine learning techniques, i.e., individual and ensemble models, were considered. For this study, two ensemble approaches (SVR AdaBoost and SVR bagging) and one individual technique (support vector regression (SVR)) were used. Coefficient of determination (R(2)), statistical assessment, and k-fold cross validation were carried out to scrutinize the efficiency of each approach used. In addition, a sensitivity technique was used to assess the influence of parameters on the prediction results. It was discovered that all of the approaches used performed better in terms of forecasting the outcomes. The SVR AdaBoost method was the most precise, with R(2) = 0.96, as opposed to SVR bagging and support vector regression, which had R(2) values of 0.87 and 0.81, respectively. Furthermore, based on the lowered error values (MAE = 4.4 MPa, RMSE = 8 MPa), statistical and k-fold cross validation tests verified the optimum performance of SVR AdaBoost. The forecast performance of the SVR bagging models, on the other hand, was equally satisfactory. In order to predict the mechanical characteristics of other construction materials, these ensemble machine learning approaches can be applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9228203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92282032022-06-25 Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques Li, Yongjian Zhang, Qizhi Kamiński, Paweł Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk Sufian, Muhammad Dyczko, Artur Kahla, Nabil Ben Atig, Miniar Materials (Basel) Article Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), machine learning techniques, i.e., individual and ensemble models, were considered. For this study, two ensemble approaches (SVR AdaBoost and SVR bagging) and one individual technique (support vector regression (SVR)) were used. Coefficient of determination (R(2)), statistical assessment, and k-fold cross validation were carried out to scrutinize the efficiency of each approach used. In addition, a sensitivity technique was used to assess the influence of parameters on the prediction results. It was discovered that all of the approaches used performed better in terms of forecasting the outcomes. The SVR AdaBoost method was the most precise, with R(2) = 0.96, as opposed to SVR bagging and support vector regression, which had R(2) values of 0.87 and 0.81, respectively. Furthermore, based on the lowered error values (MAE = 4.4 MPa, RMSE = 8 MPa), statistical and k-fold cross validation tests verified the optimum performance of SVR AdaBoost. The forecast performance of the SVR bagging models, on the other hand, was equally satisfactory. In order to predict the mechanical characteristics of other construction materials, these ensemble machine learning approaches can be applied. MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9228203/ /pubmed/35744270 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yongjian
Zhang, Qizhi
Kamiński, Paweł
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
Sufian, Muhammad
Dyczko, Artur
Kahla, Nabil Ben
Atig, Miniar
Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title_full Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title_fullStr Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title_short Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
title_sort compressive strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete employing supervised machine learning techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744270
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209
work_keys_str_mv AT liyongjian compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT zhangqizhi compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT kaminskipaweł compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT deifallaahmedfarouk compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT sufianmuhammad compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT dyczkoartur compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT kahlanabilben compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques
AT atigminiar compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques