Cargando…
Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744270 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209 |
_version_ | 1784734378268557312 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yongjian Zhang, Qizhi Kamiński, Paweł Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk Sufian, Muhammad Dyczko, Artur Kahla, Nabil Ben Atig, Miniar |
author_facet | Li, Yongjian Zhang, Qizhi Kamiński, Paweł Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk Sufian, Muhammad Dyczko, Artur Kahla, Nabil Ben Atig, Miniar |
author_sort | Li, Yongjian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), machine learning techniques, i.e., individual and ensemble models, were considered. For this study, two ensemble approaches (SVR AdaBoost and SVR bagging) and one individual technique (support vector regression (SVR)) were used. Coefficient of determination (R(2)), statistical assessment, and k-fold cross validation were carried out to scrutinize the efficiency of each approach used. In addition, a sensitivity technique was used to assess the influence of parameters on the prediction results. It was discovered that all of the approaches used performed better in terms of forecasting the outcomes. The SVR AdaBoost method was the most precise, with R(2) = 0.96, as opposed to SVR bagging and support vector regression, which had R(2) values of 0.87 and 0.81, respectively. Furthermore, based on the lowered error values (MAE = 4.4 MPa, RMSE = 8 MPa), statistical and k-fold cross validation tests verified the optimum performance of SVR AdaBoost. The forecast performance of the SVR bagging models, on the other hand, was equally satisfactory. In order to predict the mechanical characteristics of other construction materials, these ensemble machine learning approaches can be applied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9228203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92282032022-06-25 Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques Li, Yongjian Zhang, Qizhi Kamiński, Paweł Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk Sufian, Muhammad Dyczko, Artur Kahla, Nabil Ben Atig, Miniar Materials (Basel) Article Recently, research has centered on developing new approaches, such as supervised machine learning techniques, that can compute the mechanical characteristics of materials without investing much effort, time, or money in experimentation. To predict the 28-day compressive strength of steel fiber–reinforced concrete (SFRC), machine learning techniques, i.e., individual and ensemble models, were considered. For this study, two ensemble approaches (SVR AdaBoost and SVR bagging) and one individual technique (support vector regression (SVR)) were used. Coefficient of determination (R(2)), statistical assessment, and k-fold cross validation were carried out to scrutinize the efficiency of each approach used. In addition, a sensitivity technique was used to assess the influence of parameters on the prediction results. It was discovered that all of the approaches used performed better in terms of forecasting the outcomes. The SVR AdaBoost method was the most precise, with R(2) = 0.96, as opposed to SVR bagging and support vector regression, which had R(2) values of 0.87 and 0.81, respectively. Furthermore, based on the lowered error values (MAE = 4.4 MPa, RMSE = 8 MPa), statistical and k-fold cross validation tests verified the optimum performance of SVR AdaBoost. The forecast performance of the SVR bagging models, on the other hand, was equally satisfactory. In order to predict the mechanical characteristics of other construction materials, these ensemble machine learning approaches can be applied. MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9228203/ /pubmed/35744270 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yongjian Zhang, Qizhi Kamiński, Paweł Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk Sufian, Muhammad Dyczko, Artur Kahla, Nabil Ben Atig, Miniar Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title | Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title_full | Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title_fullStr | Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title_short | Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques |
title_sort | compressive strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete employing supervised machine learning techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744270 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyongjian compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT zhangqizhi compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT kaminskipaweł compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT deifallaahmedfarouk compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT sufianmuhammad compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT dyczkoartur compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT kahlanabilben compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques AT atigminiar compressivestrengthofsteelfiberreinforcedconcreteemployingsupervisedmachinelearningtechniques |