Cargando…

Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks

Tick-borne infections are a serious threat to humans, livestock, and companion animals in many parts of the world, often leading to high morbidity and mortality rates, along with decreased production values and/or costly treatments. The prevalence of the microbes responsible for these infections is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reifenberger, Gretchen C., Thomas, Bryce A., Rhodes, DeLacy V. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061254
_version_ 1784734382970372096
author Reifenberger, Gretchen C.
Thomas, Bryce A.
Rhodes, DeLacy V. L.
author_facet Reifenberger, Gretchen C.
Thomas, Bryce A.
Rhodes, DeLacy V. L.
author_sort Reifenberger, Gretchen C.
collection PubMed
description Tick-borne infections are a serious threat to humans, livestock, and companion animals in many parts of the world, often leading to high morbidity and mortality rates, along with decreased production values and/or costly treatments. The prevalence of the microbes responsible for these infections is typically assessed by the molecular identification of pathogens within the tick vectors. Ticks sampled from animals are often engorged with animal blood, presenting difficulties in the amplification of nucleic acids due to the inhibitory effects of mammalian blood on the enzymes used in polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). This study tested two tick preparation methods, three methods of DNA extraction, and four commercially available DNA polymerases to determine the most reliable method of extracting and amplifying DNA from engorged ticks. Our study found that the phenol–chloroform extraction method yielded the highest concentration of DNA, yet DNA extracted by this method was amplified the least successfully. Thermo Scientific’s Phusion Plus PCR Master Mix was the best at amplifying the tick 16s rRNA gene, regardless of extraction method. Finally, our study identified that using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissues kit for DNA extraction coupled with either Phusion Plus PCR Master Mix or GoTaq DNA polymerase Master Mix is the best combination for the optimized amplification of DNA extracted from engorged ticks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9228219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92282192022-06-25 Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks Reifenberger, Gretchen C. Thomas, Bryce A. Rhodes, DeLacy V. L. Microorganisms Communication Tick-borne infections are a serious threat to humans, livestock, and companion animals in many parts of the world, often leading to high morbidity and mortality rates, along with decreased production values and/or costly treatments. The prevalence of the microbes responsible for these infections is typically assessed by the molecular identification of pathogens within the tick vectors. Ticks sampled from animals are often engorged with animal blood, presenting difficulties in the amplification of nucleic acids due to the inhibitory effects of mammalian blood on the enzymes used in polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). This study tested two tick preparation methods, three methods of DNA extraction, and four commercially available DNA polymerases to determine the most reliable method of extracting and amplifying DNA from engorged ticks. Our study found that the phenol–chloroform extraction method yielded the highest concentration of DNA, yet DNA extracted by this method was amplified the least successfully. Thermo Scientific’s Phusion Plus PCR Master Mix was the best at amplifying the tick 16s rRNA gene, regardless of extraction method. Finally, our study identified that using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissues kit for DNA extraction coupled with either Phusion Plus PCR Master Mix or GoTaq DNA polymerase Master Mix is the best combination for the optimized amplification of DNA extracted from engorged ticks. MDPI 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9228219/ /pubmed/35744772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061254 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Reifenberger, Gretchen C.
Thomas, Bryce A.
Rhodes, DeLacy V. L.
Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title_full Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title_short Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques for Use with Engorged Hard-Bodied Ticks
title_sort comparison of dna extraction and amplification techniques for use with engorged hard-bodied ticks
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061254
work_keys_str_mv AT reifenbergergretchenc comparisonofdnaextractionandamplificationtechniquesforusewithengorgedhardbodiedticks
AT thomasbrycea comparisonofdnaextractionandamplificationtechniquesforusewithengorgedhardbodiedticks
AT rhodesdelacyvl comparisonofdnaextractionandamplificationtechniquesforusewithengorgedhardbodiedticks