Cargando…
Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199 |
_version_ | 1784734386880512000 |
---|---|
author | Leven, Robert Schmidt, Alexander Binder, Roland Kampschulte, Marian Vogler, Jonas Wöstmann, Bernd Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie |
author_facet | Leven, Robert Schmidt, Alexander Binder, Roland Kampschulte, Marian Vogler, Jonas Wöstmann, Bernd Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie |
author_sort | Leven, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C in a fully digital workflow, considering different IOS impression methods (Primescan (PRI), Trios4 without (TRI) and with scanpost (TRI+SP)) (Part A), and CAD/CAM milling of zirconium dioxid (ZIR) and resin composite (COM)-P+C (Part B). Five human models were developed in this study. Micro-CT imaging was used as a reference (REF). For Part A, the models were scanned 12 times for each impression method. Then, IOS datasets (n = 180) were superimposed with REF, and scan accuracy was determined using 3D software (GOMInspect). For Part B, one CAD/CAM-P+C (n = 30) was milled for each model, impression method, and material. The triple-scan method was applied using an industrial scanner (ATOS) to determine the accuracy of the fit. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Part A showed for PRI significantly lower accuracy than TRI and TRI+SP (p < 0.05). The data of Part B revealed significantly higher accuracy for ZIR than for COM (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, CAD/CAM-P+C of the ZIR can be recommended for fabrication in a fully digital workflow regarding the accuracy of fit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9228234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92282342022-06-25 Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow Leven, Robert Schmidt, Alexander Binder, Roland Kampschulte, Marian Vogler, Jonas Wöstmann, Bernd Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie Materials (Basel) Article Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C in a fully digital workflow, considering different IOS impression methods (Primescan (PRI), Trios4 without (TRI) and with scanpost (TRI+SP)) (Part A), and CAD/CAM milling of zirconium dioxid (ZIR) and resin composite (COM)-P+C (Part B). Five human models were developed in this study. Micro-CT imaging was used as a reference (REF). For Part A, the models were scanned 12 times for each impression method. Then, IOS datasets (n = 180) were superimposed with REF, and scan accuracy was determined using 3D software (GOMInspect). For Part B, one CAD/CAM-P+C (n = 30) was milled for each model, impression method, and material. The triple-scan method was applied using an industrial scanner (ATOS) to determine the accuracy of the fit. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Part A showed for PRI significantly lower accuracy than TRI and TRI+SP (p < 0.05). The data of Part B revealed significantly higher accuracy for ZIR than for COM (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, CAD/CAM-P+C of the ZIR can be recommended for fabrication in a fully digital workflow regarding the accuracy of fit. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9228234/ /pubmed/35744261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Leven, Robert Schmidt, Alexander Binder, Roland Kampschulte, Marian Vogler, Jonas Wöstmann, Bernd Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title | Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title_full | Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title_short | Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow |
title_sort | accuracy of digital impression taking with intraoral scanners and fabrication of cad/cam posts and cores in a fully digital workflow |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levenrobert accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT schmidtalexander accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT binderroland accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT kampschultemarian accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT voglerjonas accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT wostmannbernd accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow AT schlenzmaximilianeamelie accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow |