Cargando…

Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow

Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leven, Robert, Schmidt, Alexander, Binder, Roland, Kampschulte, Marian, Vogler, Jonas, Wöstmann, Bernd, Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199
_version_ 1784734386880512000
author Leven, Robert
Schmidt, Alexander
Binder, Roland
Kampschulte, Marian
Vogler, Jonas
Wöstmann, Bernd
Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
author_facet Leven, Robert
Schmidt, Alexander
Binder, Roland
Kampschulte, Marian
Vogler, Jonas
Wöstmann, Bernd
Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
author_sort Leven, Robert
collection PubMed
description Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C in a fully digital workflow, considering different IOS impression methods (Primescan (PRI), Trios4 without (TRI) and with scanpost (TRI+SP)) (Part A), and CAD/CAM milling of zirconium dioxid (ZIR) and resin composite (COM)-P+C (Part B). Five human models were developed in this study. Micro-CT imaging was used as a reference (REF). For Part A, the models were scanned 12 times for each impression method. Then, IOS datasets (n = 180) were superimposed with REF, and scan accuracy was determined using 3D software (GOMInspect). For Part B, one CAD/CAM-P+C (n = 30) was milled for each model, impression method, and material. The triple-scan method was applied using an industrial scanner (ATOS) to determine the accuracy of the fit. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Part A showed for PRI significantly lower accuracy than TRI and TRI+SP (p < 0.05). The data of Part B revealed significantly higher accuracy for ZIR than for COM (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, CAD/CAM-P+C of the ZIR can be recommended for fabrication in a fully digital workflow regarding the accuracy of fit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9228234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92282342022-06-25 Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow Leven, Robert Schmidt, Alexander Binder, Roland Kampschulte, Marian Vogler, Jonas Wöstmann, Bernd Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie Materials (Basel) Article Current intraoral scanners (IOS) enable direct impression taking for computer-aided de-sign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) posts and cores (P+C) with subsequent milling out of monolithic materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate the accuracy of CAD/CAM-P+C in a fully digital workflow, considering different IOS impression methods (Primescan (PRI), Trios4 without (TRI) and with scanpost (TRI+SP)) (Part A), and CAD/CAM milling of zirconium dioxid (ZIR) and resin composite (COM)-P+C (Part B). Five human models were developed in this study. Micro-CT imaging was used as a reference (REF). For Part A, the models were scanned 12 times for each impression method. Then, IOS datasets (n = 180) were superimposed with REF, and scan accuracy was determined using 3D software (GOMInspect). For Part B, one CAD/CAM-P+C (n = 30) was milled for each model, impression method, and material. The triple-scan method was applied using an industrial scanner (ATOS) to determine the accuracy of the fit. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Part A showed for PRI significantly lower accuracy than TRI and TRI+SP (p < 0.05). The data of Part B revealed significantly higher accuracy for ZIR than for COM (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, CAD/CAM-P+C of the ZIR can be recommended for fabrication in a fully digital workflow regarding the accuracy of fit. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9228234/ /pubmed/35744261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Leven, Robert
Schmidt, Alexander
Binder, Roland
Kampschulte, Marian
Vogler, Jonas
Wöstmann, Bernd
Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title_full Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title_fullStr Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title_short Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
title_sort accuracy of digital impression taking with intraoral scanners and fabrication of cad/cam posts and cores in a fully digital workflow
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15124199
work_keys_str_mv AT levenrobert accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT schmidtalexander accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT binderroland accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT kampschultemarian accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT voglerjonas accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT wostmannbernd accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow
AT schlenzmaximilianeamelie accuracyofdigitalimpressiontakingwithintraoralscannersandfabricationofcadcampostsandcoresinafullydigitalworkflow