Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study

Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieland, Jana, Satele, Daniel, Almodallal, Yahya, Novotny, Paul, Pritzl, Stephanie L., Mandrekar, Sumithra J., Jatoi, Aminah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Patient Experience Research Brief
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221107242
Descripción
Sumario:Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P = .68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.

Ejemplares similares