Cargando…
Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement
This study aimed to compare the amount of fluoride uptake and the recharge and release characteristics of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) without any additives in comparison to conventional glass ionomer cement supplemented with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) at two concentrations: 0.1% and 0....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12121971 |
_version_ | 1784734618518290432 |
---|---|
author | Alshehri, Turki D. Kotha, Sunil Babu Abed, Faisal Mohammed Barry, Mohammed J. AlAsmari, Abdulrahman Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar |
author_facet | Alshehri, Turki D. Kotha, Sunil Babu Abed, Faisal Mohammed Barry, Mohammed J. AlAsmari, Abdulrahman Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar |
author_sort | Alshehri, Turki D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the amount of fluoride uptake and the recharge and release characteristics of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) without any additives in comparison to conventional glass ionomer cement supplemented with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) at two concentrations: 0.1% and 0.2% (w/w). A total of 60 specimens were used in this in vitro study. The sample was divided into six groups—including three groups without fluoride charge: Group 1 (conventional GIC), Group 2 (GIC with 0.1% silver nanoparticles), and Group 3 (GIC with 0.2% silver nanoparticles; and three groups with fluoride charge: Group 4 (conventional GIC with fluoride); Group 5 (GIC with 0.1% silver nanoparticles with fluoride); Group 6 (GIC with 0.2% silver nanoparticles with fluoride), where Group 1 is considered the control group and the other five groups are used as the test groups. The amount of fluoride released was measured on days 1, 2, 7, 15, and 30. The comparisons were made between the groups with and without fluoride and among all the groups. A significant difference in the amount of fluoride released was observed between the groups, with the highest amount occurring in Group 1, followed by Group 2; the lowest amount of fluoride released was observed in Group 3 (p < 0.05). The groups with fluoride recharge (Groups 4, 5, and 6) exhibited a higher amount of fluoride release than the groups with no recharge (Groups 1, 2, and 3); however, Group 1 has more fluoride release compared to all other groups on days 1, 2, 7, 15, and 30 (p < 0.05). The amount of released fluoride decreased from day 1 to day 30 in all of the groups in the study. Despite the antimicrobial and anticariogenic benefits of adding silver nanoparticles to GIC, it seems that fluoride release characteristics are significantly affected by the addition of this material. This may force the clinician to a compromise between the antimicrobial benefit of silver nanoparticles and the remineralizing advantage of fluoride. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9228982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92289822022-06-25 Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement Alshehri, Turki D. Kotha, Sunil Babu Abed, Faisal Mohammed Barry, Mohammed J. AlAsmari, Abdulrahman Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar Nanomaterials (Basel) Article This study aimed to compare the amount of fluoride uptake and the recharge and release characteristics of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) without any additives in comparison to conventional glass ionomer cement supplemented with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) at two concentrations: 0.1% and 0.2% (w/w). A total of 60 specimens were used in this in vitro study. The sample was divided into six groups—including three groups without fluoride charge: Group 1 (conventional GIC), Group 2 (GIC with 0.1% silver nanoparticles), and Group 3 (GIC with 0.2% silver nanoparticles; and three groups with fluoride charge: Group 4 (conventional GIC with fluoride); Group 5 (GIC with 0.1% silver nanoparticles with fluoride); Group 6 (GIC with 0.2% silver nanoparticles with fluoride), where Group 1 is considered the control group and the other five groups are used as the test groups. The amount of fluoride released was measured on days 1, 2, 7, 15, and 30. The comparisons were made between the groups with and without fluoride and among all the groups. A significant difference in the amount of fluoride released was observed between the groups, with the highest amount occurring in Group 1, followed by Group 2; the lowest amount of fluoride released was observed in Group 3 (p < 0.05). The groups with fluoride recharge (Groups 4, 5, and 6) exhibited a higher amount of fluoride release than the groups with no recharge (Groups 1, 2, and 3); however, Group 1 has more fluoride release compared to all other groups on days 1, 2, 7, 15, and 30 (p < 0.05). The amount of released fluoride decreased from day 1 to day 30 in all of the groups in the study. Despite the antimicrobial and anticariogenic benefits of adding silver nanoparticles to GIC, it seems that fluoride release characteristics are significantly affected by the addition of this material. This may force the clinician to a compromise between the antimicrobial benefit of silver nanoparticles and the remineralizing advantage of fluoride. MDPI 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9228982/ /pubmed/35745312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12121971 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alshehri, Turki D. Kotha, Sunil Babu Abed, Faisal Mohammed Barry, Mohammed J. AlAsmari, Abdulrahman Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title | Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_full | Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_fullStr | Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_short | Effect of the Addition of Varying Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Fluoride Uptake and Recharge of Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_sort | effect of the addition of varying concentrations of silver nanoparticles on the fluoride uptake and recharge of glass ionomer cement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12121971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshehriturkid effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement AT kothasunilbabu effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement AT abedfaisalmohammed effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement AT barrymohammedj effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement AT alasmariabdulrahman effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement AT mallinenisreekanthkumar effectoftheadditionofvaryingconcentrationsofsilvernanoparticlesonthefluorideuptakeandrechargeofglassionomercement |