Cargando…
Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and severity of disasters triggered by natural hazards has increased over the last 20 years. Women of reproductive age may encounter unique reproductive health challenges following a disaster. In this scoping review we identify gaps in literature to inform future research...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01436-4 |
_version_ | 1784734662985252864 |
---|---|
author | Strid, Penelope Snead, Margaret Christine Galang, Romeo R. Bish, Connie L. Ellington, Sascha R. |
author_facet | Strid, Penelope Snead, Margaret Christine Galang, Romeo R. Bish, Connie L. Ellington, Sascha R. |
author_sort | Strid, Penelope |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence and severity of disasters triggered by natural hazards has increased over the last 20 years. Women of reproductive age may encounter unique reproductive health challenges following a disaster. In this scoping review we identify gaps in literature to inform future research and search for potential associations between disasters by natural hazards and post-disaster fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age. METHODS: Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), PsycInfo (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), Scopus, Environmental Science Collection (ProQuest Central), and Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest Central) were searched for articles published from 1980 through March 3, 2022 in English or Spanish language. Search terms were related to fertility, contraception, and disasters. We included original research that described a discrete natural hazard exposure, a population of women of reproductive age (15–49 years), and outcomes of fertility or contraception use or access, with pre- and post-disaster measures. RESULTS: Among 9788 citations, after initial exclusion 5121 remained for title and abstract review. One hundred and eighteen citations underwent full-text review and 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Following critical appraisal, 20 articles were included in this review. Eighteen articles described outcomes related to fertility, five articles described contraception access, and three articles described contraception use. CONCLUSIONS: Clearly defined exposure measures, robust analyses, and methodical post-disaster assessment periods, may address the current gaps within disaster research on fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age. Consistent patterns in fertility following a disaster triggered by natural hazards were not identified between or within disaster types. Studies that assessed contraception found no change in use, while some studies found a decrease in contraceptive access overall. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-022-01436-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9229126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92291262022-06-25 Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review Strid, Penelope Snead, Margaret Christine Galang, Romeo R. Bish, Connie L. Ellington, Sascha R. Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: The prevalence and severity of disasters triggered by natural hazards has increased over the last 20 years. Women of reproductive age may encounter unique reproductive health challenges following a disaster. In this scoping review we identify gaps in literature to inform future research and search for potential associations between disasters by natural hazards and post-disaster fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age. METHODS: Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), PsycInfo (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), Scopus, Environmental Science Collection (ProQuest Central), and Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest Central) were searched for articles published from 1980 through March 3, 2022 in English or Spanish language. Search terms were related to fertility, contraception, and disasters. We included original research that described a discrete natural hazard exposure, a population of women of reproductive age (15–49 years), and outcomes of fertility or contraception use or access, with pre- and post-disaster measures. RESULTS: Among 9788 citations, after initial exclusion 5121 remained for title and abstract review. One hundred and eighteen citations underwent full-text review and 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Following critical appraisal, 20 articles were included in this review. Eighteen articles described outcomes related to fertility, five articles described contraception access, and three articles described contraception use. CONCLUSIONS: Clearly defined exposure measures, robust analyses, and methodical post-disaster assessment periods, may address the current gaps within disaster research on fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age. Consistent patterns in fertility following a disaster triggered by natural hazards were not identified between or within disaster types. Studies that assessed contraception found no change in use, while some studies found a decrease in contraceptive access overall. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-022-01436-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9229126/ /pubmed/35739557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01436-4 Text en © US government 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Strid, Penelope Snead, Margaret Christine Galang, Romeo R. Bish, Connie L. Ellington, Sascha R. Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title | Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title_full | Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title_short | Fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
title_sort | fertility and contraception among women of reproductive age following a disaster: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01436-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stridpenelope fertilityandcontraceptionamongwomenofreproductiveagefollowingadisasterascopingreview AT sneadmargaretchristine fertilityandcontraceptionamongwomenofreproductiveagefollowingadisasterascopingreview AT galangromeor fertilityandcontraceptionamongwomenofreproductiveagefollowingadisasterascopingreview AT bishconniel fertilityandcontraceptionamongwomenofreproductiveagefollowingadisasterascopingreview AT ellingtonsaschar fertilityandcontraceptionamongwomenofreproductiveagefollowingadisasterascopingreview |