Cargando…

Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI

Background and Objectives: Functional capacity (FC) assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a novel, independent prognostic marker for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are two readily available pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drugescu, Andrei, Roca, Mihai, Zota, Ioana Mădălina, Costache, Alexandru-Dan, Gavril, Oana Irina, Gavril, Radu Sebastian, Vasilcu, Teodor Flaviu, Mitu, Ovidiu, Esanu, Irina Mihaela, Roca, Iulia-Cristina, Ghiciuc, Cristina Mihaela, Mitu, Florin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060814
_version_ 1784734721429733376
author Drugescu, Andrei
Roca, Mihai
Zota, Ioana Mădălina
Costache, Alexandru-Dan
Gavril, Oana Irina
Gavril, Radu Sebastian
Vasilcu, Teodor Flaviu
Mitu, Ovidiu
Esanu, Irina Mihaela
Roca, Iulia-Cristina
Ghiciuc, Cristina Mihaela
Mitu, Florin
author_facet Drugescu, Andrei
Roca, Mihai
Zota, Ioana Mădălina
Costache, Alexandru-Dan
Gavril, Oana Irina
Gavril, Radu Sebastian
Vasilcu, Teodor Flaviu
Mitu, Ovidiu
Esanu, Irina Mihaela
Roca, Iulia-Cristina
Ghiciuc, Cristina Mihaela
Mitu, Florin
author_sort Drugescu, Andrei
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Functional capacity (FC) assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a novel, independent prognostic marker for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are two readily available predictors of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular event risk, which could be used as cost-effective predictors of poor FC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of NLR and PLR in predicting poor FC in patients with CAD and recent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and Methods: Our cross-sectional retrospective analysis included 80 patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI (mean age 55.51 ± 11.83 years, 71.3% male) who were referred to a cardiovascular rehabilitation center from January 2020 to June 2021. All patients underwent clinical examination, cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, transthoracic echocardiography and standard blood analysis. Results: Patients were classified according to percent predicted oxygen uptake (% VO2 max) in two groups—poor FC (≤70%, n = 35) and preserved FC (>70%, n = 45). There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, gender ratio, presence of associated comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction and NLR. PLR was higher in patients with poor FC (169.8 ± 59.3 vs. 137.4 ± 35.9, p = 0.003). A PLR cut-off point of 139 had 74% sensitivity and 60% specificity in predicting poor FC. After multivariate analysis, PLR remained a significant predictor of poor functional status. Conclusions: Although CPET is the gold standard test for assessing FC prior to cardiovascular rehabilitation, its availability remains limited. PLR, a cheap and simple test, could predict poor FC in patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI and help prioritize referral for cardiovascular rehabilitation in high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9229341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92293412022-06-25 Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI Drugescu, Andrei Roca, Mihai Zota, Ioana Mădălina Costache, Alexandru-Dan Gavril, Oana Irina Gavril, Radu Sebastian Vasilcu, Teodor Flaviu Mitu, Ovidiu Esanu, Irina Mihaela Roca, Iulia-Cristina Ghiciuc, Cristina Mihaela Mitu, Florin Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Functional capacity (FC) assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a novel, independent prognostic marker for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are two readily available predictors of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular event risk, which could be used as cost-effective predictors of poor FC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of NLR and PLR in predicting poor FC in patients with CAD and recent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and Methods: Our cross-sectional retrospective analysis included 80 patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI (mean age 55.51 ± 11.83 years, 71.3% male) who were referred to a cardiovascular rehabilitation center from January 2020 to June 2021. All patients underwent clinical examination, cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, transthoracic echocardiography and standard blood analysis. Results: Patients were classified according to percent predicted oxygen uptake (% VO2 max) in two groups—poor FC (≤70%, n = 35) and preserved FC (>70%, n = 45). There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, gender ratio, presence of associated comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction and NLR. PLR was higher in patients with poor FC (169.8 ± 59.3 vs. 137.4 ± 35.9, p = 0.003). A PLR cut-off point of 139 had 74% sensitivity and 60% specificity in predicting poor FC. After multivariate analysis, PLR remained a significant predictor of poor functional status. Conclusions: Although CPET is the gold standard test for assessing FC prior to cardiovascular rehabilitation, its availability remains limited. PLR, a cheap and simple test, could predict poor FC in patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI and help prioritize referral for cardiovascular rehabilitation in high-risk patients. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9229341/ /pubmed/35744077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060814 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Drugescu, Andrei
Roca, Mihai
Zota, Ioana Mădălina
Costache, Alexandru-Dan
Gavril, Oana Irina
Gavril, Radu Sebastian
Vasilcu, Teodor Flaviu
Mitu, Ovidiu
Esanu, Irina Mihaela
Roca, Iulia-Cristina
Ghiciuc, Cristina Mihaela
Mitu, Florin
Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title_full Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title_fullStr Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title_full_unstemmed Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title_short Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI
title_sort value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in predicting cpet performance in patients with stable cad and recent elective pci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060814
work_keys_str_mv AT drugescuandrei valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT rocamihai valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT zotaioanamadalina valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT costachealexandrudan valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT gavriloanairina valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT gavrilradusebastian valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT vasilcuteodorflaviu valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT mituovidiu valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT esanuirinamihaela valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT rocaiuliacristina valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT ghiciuccristinamihaela valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci
AT mituflorin valueoftheneutrophiltolymphocyteratioandplatelettolymphocyteratioinpredictingcpetperformanceinpatientswithstablecadandrecentelectivepci