Cargando…

Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis

So far, various approaches have been proposed to improve dermal drug delivery. The use of chemical penetration enhancers has a long history of application, while methods based on the electrical current (such as iontophoresis) stand out as promising “active” techniques. Aiming to evaluate the contrib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolić, Ines, Simić, Mitar, Pantelić, Ivana, Stojanović, Goran, Antić Stanković, Jelena, Marković, Bojan, Savić, Snežana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061144
_version_ 1784734728922857472
author Nikolić, Ines
Simić, Mitar
Pantelić, Ivana
Stojanović, Goran
Antić Stanković, Jelena
Marković, Bojan
Savić, Snežana
author_facet Nikolić, Ines
Simić, Mitar
Pantelić, Ivana
Stojanović, Goran
Antić Stanković, Jelena
Marković, Bojan
Savić, Snežana
author_sort Nikolić, Ines
collection PubMed
description So far, various approaches have been proposed to improve dermal drug delivery. The use of chemical penetration enhancers has a long history of application, while methods based on the electrical current (such as iontophoresis) stand out as promising “active” techniques. Aiming to evaluate the contribution of different approaches to dermal delivery, in this work curcumin-loaded nanoemulsions with and without monoterpenes (eucalyptol or pinene) as chemical penetration enhancers, and a custom-made adhesive dermal delivery system based on iontophoresis were designed and assessed. In an in vivo study applying skin bioengineering techniques, their safety profile was proven. Three examined iontophoresis protocols, with total skin exposure time of 15 min (continuous flow for 15 min (15-0); 3 min of continuous flow and 2 min pause (3-2; 5 cycles) and 5 min of continuous flow and 1 min pause (5-1; 3 cycles) were equally efficient in terms of the total amount of curcumin that penetrated through the superficial skin layers (in vivo tape stripping) (Q(3-2) = 7.04 ± 3.21 μg/cm(2); Q(5-1) = 6.66 ± 2.11 μg/cm(2); Q(15-0) = 6.96 ± 3.21 μg/cm(2)), significantly more efficient compared to the referent nanoemulsion and monoterpene-containing nanoemulsions. Further improvement of an efficient mobile adhesive system for iontophoresis would be a practical contribution in the field of dermal drug application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9229366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92293662022-06-25 Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis Nikolić, Ines Simić, Mitar Pantelić, Ivana Stojanović, Goran Antić Stanković, Jelena Marković, Bojan Savić, Snežana Pharmaceutics Article So far, various approaches have been proposed to improve dermal drug delivery. The use of chemical penetration enhancers has a long history of application, while methods based on the electrical current (such as iontophoresis) stand out as promising “active” techniques. Aiming to evaluate the contribution of different approaches to dermal delivery, in this work curcumin-loaded nanoemulsions with and without monoterpenes (eucalyptol or pinene) as chemical penetration enhancers, and a custom-made adhesive dermal delivery system based on iontophoresis were designed and assessed. In an in vivo study applying skin bioengineering techniques, their safety profile was proven. Three examined iontophoresis protocols, with total skin exposure time of 15 min (continuous flow for 15 min (15-0); 3 min of continuous flow and 2 min pause (3-2; 5 cycles) and 5 min of continuous flow and 1 min pause (5-1; 3 cycles) were equally efficient in terms of the total amount of curcumin that penetrated through the superficial skin layers (in vivo tape stripping) (Q(3-2) = 7.04 ± 3.21 μg/cm(2); Q(5-1) = 6.66 ± 2.11 μg/cm(2); Q(15-0) = 6.96 ± 3.21 μg/cm(2)), significantly more efficient compared to the referent nanoemulsion and monoterpene-containing nanoemulsions. Further improvement of an efficient mobile adhesive system for iontophoresis would be a practical contribution in the field of dermal drug application. MDPI 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9229366/ /pubmed/35745717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061144 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nikolić, Ines
Simić, Mitar
Pantelić, Ivana
Stojanović, Goran
Antić Stanković, Jelena
Marković, Bojan
Savić, Snežana
Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title_full Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title_fullStr Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title_full_unstemmed Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title_short Chemical vs. Physical Methods to Improve Dermal Drug Delivery: A Case Study with Nanoemulsions and Iontophoresis
title_sort chemical vs. physical methods to improve dermal drug delivery: a case study with nanoemulsions and iontophoresis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35745717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061144
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolicines chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT simicmitar chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT pantelicivana chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT stojanovicgoran chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT anticstankovicjelena chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT markovicbojan chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis
AT savicsnezana chemicalvsphysicalmethodstoimprovedermaldrugdeliveryacasestudywithnanoemulsionsandiontophoresis