Cargando…
Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation
BACKGROUND: Debonding of ball attachments is one of the complications that annoy teeth supported overdenture wearers. The polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers are widely applied in the dental field. The purpose of the current study was to compare the tensile bond str...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02282-3 |
_version_ | 1784734769232216064 |
---|---|
author | Abdelfattah Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa El Homossany, Mahmoud El-Moutassem Bellah Abdelmoniem, Sarah Mohamed Abdelrahman, Tariq Yehia |
author_facet | Abdelfattah Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa El Homossany, Mahmoud El-Moutassem Bellah Abdelmoniem, Sarah Mohamed Abdelrahman, Tariq Yehia |
author_sort | Abdelfattah Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Debonding of ball attachments is one of the complications that annoy teeth supported overdenture wearers. The polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers are widely applied in the dental field. The purpose of the current study was to compare the tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of such materials and the commonly used titanium ones after 5 years of overdenture insertion and removal (5000 cycles) in addition to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycle). METHODS: Extracted mandibular canines (N = 60) were randomly allocated into three groups and received ball attachments; titanium (group TI; N = 20), PEEK (group PE; N = 20), PEKK (group PK; N = 20). In each group, the samples were divided into two subgroups whereas tensile bond strength was measured pre aging (T0; n = 10) and post aging (T1; n = 10). Tensile bond strength was measured by the Pull out test using the Universal testing machine. Failure mode analysis was determined by examination of the samples’ surfaces under 65X stereomicroscope. The resulting data followed normal distribution and the significance level was set at (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One Way Anova showed statistically significant difference between the three groups (P < .00001). PostHoc Tukey test showed statistically significant difference between the groups TI and PE, TI and PK and no statistically significant difference between the groups PE and PK. Paired t test showed statistically significant difference in the tensile bond strength pre and post aging in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PEEK and PEKK ball attachments could be concluded to have a higher tensile bond strength compared to the titanium ones when bonded to root dentin. Tensile bond strength of such attachments may decrease with aging as well. Clinically, the higher tensile bond strength may have a lesser rate of debonding and thus reduced patient apprehension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9229525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92295252022-06-25 Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation Abdelfattah Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa El Homossany, Mahmoud El-Moutassem Bellah Abdelmoniem, Sarah Mohamed Abdelrahman, Tariq Yehia BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Debonding of ball attachments is one of the complications that annoy teeth supported overdenture wearers. The polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers are widely applied in the dental field. The purpose of the current study was to compare the tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of such materials and the commonly used titanium ones after 5 years of overdenture insertion and removal (5000 cycles) in addition to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycle). METHODS: Extracted mandibular canines (N = 60) were randomly allocated into three groups and received ball attachments; titanium (group TI; N = 20), PEEK (group PE; N = 20), PEKK (group PK; N = 20). In each group, the samples were divided into two subgroups whereas tensile bond strength was measured pre aging (T0; n = 10) and post aging (T1; n = 10). Tensile bond strength was measured by the Pull out test using the Universal testing machine. Failure mode analysis was determined by examination of the samples’ surfaces under 65X stereomicroscope. The resulting data followed normal distribution and the significance level was set at (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One Way Anova showed statistically significant difference between the three groups (P < .00001). PostHoc Tukey test showed statistically significant difference between the groups TI and PE, TI and PK and no statistically significant difference between the groups PE and PK. Paired t test showed statistically significant difference in the tensile bond strength pre and post aging in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PEEK and PEKK ball attachments could be concluded to have a higher tensile bond strength compared to the titanium ones when bonded to root dentin. Tensile bond strength of such attachments may decrease with aging as well. Clinically, the higher tensile bond strength may have a lesser rate of debonding and thus reduced patient apprehension. BioMed Central 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9229525/ /pubmed/35751090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02282-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Abdelfattah Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa El Homossany, Mahmoud El-Moutassem Bellah Abdelmoniem, Sarah Mohamed Abdelrahman, Tariq Yehia Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title | Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title_full | Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title_short | Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
title_sort | comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02282-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelfattahmohamedahmedmostafa comparisonoftensilebondstrengthofballattachmentsmadeofdifferentmaterialstorootcanaldentinafterchewingsimulation AT elhomossanymahmoudelmoutassembellah comparisonoftensilebondstrengthofballattachmentsmadeofdifferentmaterialstorootcanaldentinafterchewingsimulation AT abdelmoniemsarahmohamed comparisonoftensilebondstrengthofballattachmentsmadeofdifferentmaterialstorootcanaldentinafterchewingsimulation AT abdelrahmantariqyehia comparisonoftensilebondstrengthofballattachmentsmadeofdifferentmaterialstorootcanaldentinafterchewingsimulation |