Cargando…
The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the contamination level of fresh meat on the bacterial population in raw material before cooking and on the microbiota of cooked hams following heat treatment. The effect of incubation temperatures of 6.5 and 15 °C on the results obtained was als...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061106 |
_version_ | 1784734827540381696 |
---|---|
author | Veselá, Helena Dorotíková, Kateřina Dušková, Marta Furmančíková, Petra Šedo, Ondrej Kameník, Josef |
author_facet | Veselá, Helena Dorotíková, Kateřina Dušková, Marta Furmančíková, Petra Šedo, Ondrej Kameník, Josef |
author_sort | Veselá, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the contamination level of fresh meat on the bacterial population in raw material before cooking and on the microbiota of cooked hams following heat treatment. The effect of incubation temperatures of 6.5 and 15 °C on the results obtained was also evaluated during the bacteriological investigation. The total viable count (TVC), the number of Enterobacteriaceae and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were determined in the samples. LAB were isolated from 13 samples out of the 50 fresh meat samples. The species most frequently detected included Latilactobacillus sakei, Leuconostoc carnosum, Enterococcus gilvus, Latilactobacillus curvatus, and Leuconostoc gelidum. The meat sampled after the brine injection and tumbler massaging showed higher bacterial counts compared to fresh meat samples (p < 0.001). The heat treatment destroyed the majority of the bacteria, as the bacterial counts were beneath the limit of detection with a few exceptions. Although the primary cultivation of samples of cooked hams did not reveal the presence of LAB, their presence was confirmed in 11 out of 12 samples by a stability test. Bacteria of the genus Leuconostoc were the most numerous. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9229742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92297422022-06-25 The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams Veselá, Helena Dorotíková, Kateřina Dušková, Marta Furmančíková, Petra Šedo, Ondrej Kameník, Josef Microorganisms Article The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the contamination level of fresh meat on the bacterial population in raw material before cooking and on the microbiota of cooked hams following heat treatment. The effect of incubation temperatures of 6.5 and 15 °C on the results obtained was also evaluated during the bacteriological investigation. The total viable count (TVC), the number of Enterobacteriaceae and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were determined in the samples. LAB were isolated from 13 samples out of the 50 fresh meat samples. The species most frequently detected included Latilactobacillus sakei, Leuconostoc carnosum, Enterococcus gilvus, Latilactobacillus curvatus, and Leuconostoc gelidum. The meat sampled after the brine injection and tumbler massaging showed higher bacterial counts compared to fresh meat samples (p < 0.001). The heat treatment destroyed the majority of the bacteria, as the bacterial counts were beneath the limit of detection with a few exceptions. Although the primary cultivation of samples of cooked hams did not reveal the presence of LAB, their presence was confirmed in 11 out of 12 samples by a stability test. Bacteria of the genus Leuconostoc were the most numerous. MDPI 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9229742/ /pubmed/35744624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061106 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Veselá, Helena Dorotíková, Kateřina Dušková, Marta Furmančíková, Petra Šedo, Ondrej Kameník, Josef The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title | The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title_full | The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title_fullStr | The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title_full_unstemmed | The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title_short | The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams |
title_sort | pork meat or the environment of the production facility? the effect of individual technological steps on the bacterial contamination in cooked hams |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veselahelena theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT dorotikovakaterina theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT duskovamarta theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT furmancikovapetra theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT sedoondrej theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT kamenikjosef theporkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT veselahelena porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT dorotikovakaterina porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT duskovamarta porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT furmancikovapetra porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT sedoondrej porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams AT kamenikjosef porkmeatortheenvironmentoftheproductionfacilitytheeffectofindividualtechnologicalstepsonthebacterialcontaminationincookedhams |