Cargando…
In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review
Backgroundand Objectives: Hypertrophic scars following surgeries or burns present a serious concern for many patients because these scars not only lead to an aesthetical but also to a functional and psychological burden. Treatment of hypertrophic scars is challenging because despite various treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060736 |
_version_ | 1784734862646706176 |
---|---|
author | Rössler, Stefan Nischwitz, Sebastian Philipp Luze, Hanna Holzer-Geissler, Judith C. J. Zrim, Robert Kamolz, Lars-Peter |
author_facet | Rössler, Stefan Nischwitz, Sebastian Philipp Luze, Hanna Holzer-Geissler, Judith C. J. Zrim, Robert Kamolz, Lars-Peter |
author_sort | Rössler, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Backgroundand Objectives: Hypertrophic scars following surgeries or burns present a serious concern for many patients because these scars not only lead to an aesthetical but also to a functional and psychological burden. Treatment of hypertrophic scars is challenging because despite various treatment options, a low level of evidence hinders preference of any specific treatment plan. To properly identify new therapeutic approaches, the use of in vivo models remains indispensable. A gold standard for hypertrophic scars has not been established to date. This review aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the available in vivo models. Materials and Methods: PubMed and CINAHL were queried for currently existing models. Results: Models with mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, guinea pigs and dogs are used in hypertrophic scar research. Rodent models provide the advantage of ready availability and low costs, but the number of scars per animal is limited due to their relatively small body surface, leading to a high number of test animals which should be avoided according to the 3Rs. Multiple scars per animal can be created in the guinea pig and rabbit ear model; but like other rodent models, these models exhibit low transferability to human conditions. Pig models show a good transferability, but are cost-intensive and require adequate housing facilities. Further, it is not clear if a currently available pig model can deliver clinical and histological features of human hypertrophic scars concurrently. Conclusions: None of the analyzed animal models can be clearly recommended as a standard model in hypertrophic scar research because the particular research question must be considered to elect a suitable model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9229864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92298642022-06-25 In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review Rössler, Stefan Nischwitz, Sebastian Philipp Luze, Hanna Holzer-Geissler, Judith C. J. Zrim, Robert Kamolz, Lars-Peter Medicina (Kaunas) Systematic Review Backgroundand Objectives: Hypertrophic scars following surgeries or burns present a serious concern for many patients because these scars not only lead to an aesthetical but also to a functional and psychological burden. Treatment of hypertrophic scars is challenging because despite various treatment options, a low level of evidence hinders preference of any specific treatment plan. To properly identify new therapeutic approaches, the use of in vivo models remains indispensable. A gold standard for hypertrophic scars has not been established to date. This review aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the available in vivo models. Materials and Methods: PubMed and CINAHL were queried for currently existing models. Results: Models with mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, guinea pigs and dogs are used in hypertrophic scar research. Rodent models provide the advantage of ready availability and low costs, but the number of scars per animal is limited due to their relatively small body surface, leading to a high number of test animals which should be avoided according to the 3Rs. Multiple scars per animal can be created in the guinea pig and rabbit ear model; but like other rodent models, these models exhibit low transferability to human conditions. Pig models show a good transferability, but are cost-intensive and require adequate housing facilities. Further, it is not clear if a currently available pig model can deliver clinical and histological features of human hypertrophic scars concurrently. Conclusions: None of the analyzed animal models can be clearly recommended as a standard model in hypertrophic scar research because the particular research question must be considered to elect a suitable model. MDPI 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9229864/ /pubmed/35743999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060736 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Rössler, Stefan Nischwitz, Sebastian Philipp Luze, Hanna Holzer-Geissler, Judith C. J. Zrim, Robert Kamolz, Lars-Peter In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title | In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title_full | In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title_short | In Vivo Models for Hypertrophic Scars—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | in vivo models for hypertrophic scars—a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9229864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosslerstefan invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview AT nischwitzsebastianphilipp invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview AT luzehanna invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview AT holzergeisslerjudithcj invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview AT zrimrobert invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview AT kamolzlarspeter invivomodelsforhypertrophicscarsasystematicreview |