Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is an oncogenic virus belonging to the genus Deltaretrovirus and is the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis. Proviral load (PVL) determined by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is now widely used as an indicator of not only BLV infection, but also BLV disease prog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoneyama, Syuji, Kobayashi, Sota, Matsunaga, Towa, Tonosaki, Kaoru, Leng, Dongze, Sakai, Yusuke, Yamada, Shinji, Kimura, Atsushi, Ichijo, Toshihiro, Hikono, Hirokazu, Murakami, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14061182
_version_ 1784734961823121408
author Yoneyama, Syuji
Kobayashi, Sota
Matsunaga, Towa
Tonosaki, Kaoru
Leng, Dongze
Sakai, Yusuke
Yamada, Shinji
Kimura, Atsushi
Ichijo, Toshihiro
Hikono, Hirokazu
Murakami, Kenji
author_facet Yoneyama, Syuji
Kobayashi, Sota
Matsunaga, Towa
Tonosaki, Kaoru
Leng, Dongze
Sakai, Yusuke
Yamada, Shinji
Kimura, Atsushi
Ichijo, Toshihiro
Hikono, Hirokazu
Murakami, Kenji
author_sort Yoneyama, Syuji
collection PubMed
description Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is an oncogenic virus belonging to the genus Deltaretrovirus and is the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis. Proviral load (PVL) determined by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is now widely used as an indicator of not only BLV infection, but also BLV disease progression. To interpret PVLs determined by different qPCRs used in Japan, we compared a chimeric cycling probe-based qPCR, CY415, targeting the BLV tax region; a TaqMan probe-based qPCR, RC202, targeting the BLV pol region; and a TaqMan probe-based qPCR, CoCoMo, targeting the BLV long terminal repeat (LTR) region. Whole-blood samples collected from 317 naturally BLV-infected cattle (165 Holstein–Friesian and 152 Japanese Black) and tumor tissue samples collected from 32 cattle at a meat inspection center were used. The PVLs determined by each qPCR were strongly correlated. However, the PVL and the proportion of BLV-infected cells determined by RC202 or CoCoMo were significantly higher than those determined by CY415. Genetic analysis of three tumor tissue samples revealed that LTR region mutations or a deletion affected the PVL determined by CoCoMo. These results suggest that the TaqMan-based RC202 or CoCoMo qPCR is better than CY415 for BLV PVL analysis. However, qPCR target region mutations were not rare in tumors and could hamper PVL analysis by using qPCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9230052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92300522022-06-25 Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus Yoneyama, Syuji Kobayashi, Sota Matsunaga, Towa Tonosaki, Kaoru Leng, Dongze Sakai, Yusuke Yamada, Shinji Kimura, Atsushi Ichijo, Toshihiro Hikono, Hirokazu Murakami, Kenji Viruses Article Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is an oncogenic virus belonging to the genus Deltaretrovirus and is the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis. Proviral load (PVL) determined by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is now widely used as an indicator of not only BLV infection, but also BLV disease progression. To interpret PVLs determined by different qPCRs used in Japan, we compared a chimeric cycling probe-based qPCR, CY415, targeting the BLV tax region; a TaqMan probe-based qPCR, RC202, targeting the BLV pol region; and a TaqMan probe-based qPCR, CoCoMo, targeting the BLV long terminal repeat (LTR) region. Whole-blood samples collected from 317 naturally BLV-infected cattle (165 Holstein–Friesian and 152 Japanese Black) and tumor tissue samples collected from 32 cattle at a meat inspection center were used. The PVLs determined by each qPCR were strongly correlated. However, the PVL and the proportion of BLV-infected cells determined by RC202 or CoCoMo were significantly higher than those determined by CY415. Genetic analysis of three tumor tissue samples revealed that LTR region mutations or a deletion affected the PVL determined by CoCoMo. These results suggest that the TaqMan-based RC202 or CoCoMo qPCR is better than CY415 for BLV PVL analysis. However, qPCR target region mutations were not rare in tumors and could hamper PVL analysis by using qPCR. MDPI 2022-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9230052/ /pubmed/35746654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14061182 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yoneyama, Syuji
Kobayashi, Sota
Matsunaga, Towa
Tonosaki, Kaoru
Leng, Dongze
Sakai, Yusuke
Yamada, Shinji
Kimura, Atsushi
Ichijo, Toshihiro
Hikono, Hirokazu
Murakami, Kenji
Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus
title_sort comparative evaluation of three commercial quantitative real-time pcrs used in japan for bovine leukemia virus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14061182
work_keys_str_mv AT yoneyamasyuji comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT kobayashisota comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT matsunagatowa comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT tonosakikaoru comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT lengdongze comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT sakaiyusuke comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT yamadashinji comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT kimuraatsushi comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT ichijotoshihiro comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT hikonohirokazu comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus
AT murakamikenji comparativeevaluationofthreecommercialquantitativerealtimepcrsusedinjapanforbovineleukemiavirus