Cargando…

Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR

‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (CaLsol) is an uncultured bacterium, transmitted by psyllids and associated with several diseases in Solanaceae and Apiaceae crops. CaLsol detection in psyllids often requires insect destruction, preventing a subsequent morphological identification. In this wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintana, María, de-León, Leandro, Cubero, Jaime, Siverio, Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061104
_version_ 1784735101744054272
author Quintana, María
de-León, Leandro
Cubero, Jaime
Siverio, Felipe
author_facet Quintana, María
de-León, Leandro
Cubero, Jaime
Siverio, Felipe
author_sort Quintana, María
collection PubMed
description ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (CaLsol) is an uncultured bacterium, transmitted by psyllids and associated with several diseases in Solanaceae and Apiaceae crops. CaLsol detection in psyllids often requires insect destruction, preventing a subsequent morphological identification. In this work, we have assessed the influence on the detection of CaLsol by PCR in Bactericera trigonica (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), of four specimen preparations (entire body, ground, cut-off head, and punctured abdomen) and seven DNA extraction methods (PBS suspension, squashing on membrane, CTAB, Chelex, TRIsure(TM), HotSHOT, and DNeasy(®)). DNA yield and purity ratios, time consumption, cost, and residues generated were also evaluated. Optimum results were obtained through grinding, but it is suggested that destructive procedures are not essential in order to detect CaLsol. Although CaLsol was detected by qPCR with DNA obtained by the different procedures, HotSHOT was the most sensitive method. In terms of time consumption and cost, squashed on membrane, HotSHOT, and PBS were the fastest, while HotSHOT and PBS were the cheapest. In summary, HotSHOT was accurate, fast, simple, and sufficiently sensitive to detect this bacterium within the vector. Additionally, cross-contamination with CaLsol was assessed in the ethanol solutions where B. trigonica specimens were usually collected and preserved. CaLsol-free psyllids were CaLsol-positive after incubation with CaLsol-positive specimens. This work provides a valuable guide when choosing a method to detect CaLsol in vectors according to the purpose of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9230594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92305942022-06-25 Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR Quintana, María de-León, Leandro Cubero, Jaime Siverio, Felipe Microorganisms Article ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (CaLsol) is an uncultured bacterium, transmitted by psyllids and associated with several diseases in Solanaceae and Apiaceae crops. CaLsol detection in psyllids often requires insect destruction, preventing a subsequent morphological identification. In this work, we have assessed the influence on the detection of CaLsol by PCR in Bactericera trigonica (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), of four specimen preparations (entire body, ground, cut-off head, and punctured abdomen) and seven DNA extraction methods (PBS suspension, squashing on membrane, CTAB, Chelex, TRIsure(TM), HotSHOT, and DNeasy(®)). DNA yield and purity ratios, time consumption, cost, and residues generated were also evaluated. Optimum results were obtained through grinding, but it is suggested that destructive procedures are not essential in order to detect CaLsol. Although CaLsol was detected by qPCR with DNA obtained by the different procedures, HotSHOT was the most sensitive method. In terms of time consumption and cost, squashed on membrane, HotSHOT, and PBS were the fastest, while HotSHOT and PBS were the cheapest. In summary, HotSHOT was accurate, fast, simple, and sufficiently sensitive to detect this bacterium within the vector. Additionally, cross-contamination with CaLsol was assessed in the ethanol solutions where B. trigonica specimens were usually collected and preserved. CaLsol-free psyllids were CaLsol-positive after incubation with CaLsol-positive specimens. This work provides a valuable guide when choosing a method to detect CaLsol in vectors according to the purpose of the study. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9230594/ /pubmed/35744622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061104 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Quintana, María
de-León, Leandro
Cubero, Jaime
Siverio, Felipe
Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title_full Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title_fullStr Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title_short Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ by qPCR
title_sort assessment of psyllid handling and dna extraction methods in the detection of ‘candidatus liberibacter solanacearum’ by qpcr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061104
work_keys_str_mv AT quintanamaria assessmentofpsyllidhandlinganddnaextractionmethodsinthedetectionofcandidatusliberibactersolanacearumbyqpcr
AT deleonleandro assessmentofpsyllidhandlinganddnaextractionmethodsinthedetectionofcandidatusliberibactersolanacearumbyqpcr
AT cuberojaime assessmentofpsyllidhandlinganddnaextractionmethodsinthedetectionofcandidatusliberibactersolanacearumbyqpcr
AT siveriofelipe assessmentofpsyllidhandlinganddnaextractionmethodsinthedetectionofcandidatusliberibactersolanacearumbyqpcr