Cargando…
Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area
The diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections still widely relies on microscopic examination of stools and requires reliable reagents and staff expertise. The ParaFlo(®) assays (Eurobio Ingen) are ready-to-use concentration methods for parasite egg detection, and they could improve reagent tracea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061237 |
_version_ | 1784735122085380096 |
---|---|
author | Autier, Brice Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Robert-Gangneux, Florence |
author_facet | Autier, Brice Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Robert-Gangneux, Florence |
author_sort | Autier, Brice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections still widely relies on microscopic examination of stools and requires reliable reagents and staff expertise. The ParaFlo(®) assays (Eurobio Ingen) are ready-to-use concentration methods for parasite egg detection, and they could improve reagent traceability and ease of manipulation. Ninety-three stool samples were analyzed with the ParaFlo(®) concentration methods and then compared with routine microscopic methods for protozoa and helminth detection: seventy-eight were analyzed with ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and in-house Thebault or Bailenger concentrations, and fifty-five were analyzed with ParaFlo(®)DC and the in-house merthiolate-formalin diphasic concentration (DC) method. Fully concordant results were obtained for 75%, 70%, and 69% of samples when comparing ParaFlo(®) DC and in-house DC, ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and in-house Bailenger, and ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and Thebault, respectively. The performances of the ParaFlo(®) assays did not differ statistically from that obtained with their in-house counterparts (Bailenger and DC) for the detection of protozoa, but ParaFlo(®) Bailenger performed significantly poorer than the Thebault method (p < 0.001). No statistical differences were observed between the commercial and in-house methods for helminth detection. These marketed concentration methods could be used in routine if combined with other techniques for protozoa detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9230666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92306662022-06-25 Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area Autier, Brice Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Robert-Gangneux, Florence Microorganisms Article The diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections still widely relies on microscopic examination of stools and requires reliable reagents and staff expertise. The ParaFlo(®) assays (Eurobio Ingen) are ready-to-use concentration methods for parasite egg detection, and they could improve reagent traceability and ease of manipulation. Ninety-three stool samples were analyzed with the ParaFlo(®) concentration methods and then compared with routine microscopic methods for protozoa and helminth detection: seventy-eight were analyzed with ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and in-house Thebault or Bailenger concentrations, and fifty-five were analyzed with ParaFlo(®)DC and the in-house merthiolate-formalin diphasic concentration (DC) method. Fully concordant results were obtained for 75%, 70%, and 69% of samples when comparing ParaFlo(®) DC and in-house DC, ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and in-house Bailenger, and ParaFlo(®) Bailenger and Thebault, respectively. The performances of the ParaFlo(®) assays did not differ statistically from that obtained with their in-house counterparts (Bailenger and DC) for the detection of protozoa, but ParaFlo(®) Bailenger performed significantly poorer than the Thebault method (p < 0.001). No statistical differences were observed between the commercial and in-house methods for helminth detection. These marketed concentration methods could be used in routine if combined with other techniques for protozoa detection. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9230666/ /pubmed/35744756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061237 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Autier, Brice Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Robert-Gangneux, Florence Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title | Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_full | Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_short | Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_sort | evaluation of commercial concentration methods for microscopic diagnosis of protozoa and helminths in human stool samples in a non-endemic area |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT autierbrice evaluationofcommercialconcentrationmethodsformicroscopicdiagnosisofprotozoaandhelminthsinhumanstoolsamplesinanonendemicarea AT gangneuxjeanpierre evaluationofcommercialconcentrationmethodsformicroscopicdiagnosisofprotozoaandhelminthsinhumanstoolsamplesinanonendemicarea AT robertgangneuxflorence evaluationofcommercialconcentrationmethodsformicroscopicdiagnosisofprotozoaandhelminthsinhumanstoolsamplesinanonendemicarea |