Cargando…

Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is increasingly used in a variety of applications, including health care, fitness tracking, and rehabilitation. To reduce the impact on the user’s daily activities, wearable technologies have been advanced throughout the years. In this study, an improved smart insole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Arco, Luigi, Wang, Haiying, Zheng, Huiru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35736546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5030045
_version_ 1784735140245667840
author D’Arco, Luigi
Wang, Haiying
Zheng, Huiru
author_facet D’Arco, Luigi
Wang, Haiying
Zheng, Huiru
author_sort D’Arco, Luigi
collection PubMed
description Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is increasingly used in a variety of applications, including health care, fitness tracking, and rehabilitation. To reduce the impact on the user’s daily activities, wearable technologies have been advanced throughout the years. In this study, an improved smart insole-based HAR system is proposed. The impact of data segmentation, sensors used, and feature selection on HAR was fully investigated. The Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised learning algorithm, has been used to recognise six ambulation activities: downstairs, sit to stand, sitting, standing, upstairs, and walking. Considering the impact that data segmentation can have on the classification, the sliding window size was optimised, identifying the length of 10 s with 50% of overlap as the best performing. The inertial sensors and pressure sensors embedded into the smart insoles have been assessed to determine the importance that each one has in the classification. A feature selection technique has been applied to reduce the number of features from 272 to 227 to improve the robustness of the proposed system and to investigate the importance of features in the dataset. According to the findings, the inertial sensors are reliable for the recognition of dynamic activities, while pressure sensors are reliable for stationary activities; however, the highest accuracy ([Formula: see text]) was achieved by combining both types of sensors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9230734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92307342022-06-25 Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition D’Arco, Luigi Wang, Haiying Zheng, Huiru Methods Protoc Article Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is increasingly used in a variety of applications, including health care, fitness tracking, and rehabilitation. To reduce the impact on the user’s daily activities, wearable technologies have been advanced throughout the years. In this study, an improved smart insole-based HAR system is proposed. The impact of data segmentation, sensors used, and feature selection on HAR was fully investigated. The Support Vector Machine (SVM), a supervised learning algorithm, has been used to recognise six ambulation activities: downstairs, sit to stand, sitting, standing, upstairs, and walking. Considering the impact that data segmentation can have on the classification, the sliding window size was optimised, identifying the length of 10 s with 50% of overlap as the best performing. The inertial sensors and pressure sensors embedded into the smart insoles have been assessed to determine the importance that each one has in the classification. A feature selection technique has been applied to reduce the number of features from 272 to 227 to improve the robustness of the proposed system and to investigate the importance of features in the dataset. According to the findings, the inertial sensors are reliable for the recognition of dynamic activities, while pressure sensors are reliable for stationary activities; however, the highest accuracy ([Formula: see text]) was achieved by combining both types of sensors. MDPI 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9230734/ /pubmed/35736546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5030045 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Arco, Luigi
Wang, Haiying
Zheng, Huiru
Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title_full Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title_fullStr Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title_short Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition
title_sort assessing impact of sensors and feature selection in smart-insole-based human activity recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9230734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35736546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5030045
work_keys_str_mv AT darcoluigi assessingimpactofsensorsandfeatureselectioninsmartinsolebasedhumanactivityrecognition
AT wanghaiying assessingimpactofsensorsandfeatureselectioninsmartinsolebasedhumanactivityrecognition
AT zhenghuiru assessingimpactofsensorsandfeatureselectioninsmartinsolebasedhumanactivityrecognition