Cargando…
Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441 |
_version_ | 1784735245933740032 |
---|---|
author | Khurshid, Zohaib Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa Bencharit, Sompop Najeeb, Shariq |
author_facet | Khurshid, Zohaib Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa Bencharit, Sompop Najeeb, Shariq |
author_sort | Khurshid, Zohaib |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic review aims to analyse and appraise the literature concerning PEEK dental prostheses critically. Methods: The following focused question was constructed ‘Are dental prostheses made of PEEK inferior to those made of other materials in terms of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes?’. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) tool was used for the quality assessment of the randomised clinical trials. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of observational studies and the case reports were evaluated using the CARE (Case Report) guidelines. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this review. Two case studies received an overall grade of medium and the overall quality of six studies was graded as ‘low’. All three observational studies and the only randomised controlled trial received scores of ‘medium’. Conclusion: PEEK-based dental prostheses may provide a viable and more esthetic alternative to conventional prosthodontic appliances. However, within the limitations of this study is the evidence to ascertain the long-term viability of PEEK-based dental prostheses. Future studies should focus on conducting large-scale, multicenter trials to compare the survival rate of PEEK prostheses to that of conventionally available prosthodontic appliances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9231096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92310962022-06-25 Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies Khurshid, Zohaib Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa Bencharit, Sompop Najeeb, Shariq Polymers (Basel) Systematic Review Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic review aims to analyse and appraise the literature concerning PEEK dental prostheses critically. Methods: The following focused question was constructed ‘Are dental prostheses made of PEEK inferior to those made of other materials in terms of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes?’. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) tool was used for the quality assessment of the randomised clinical trials. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of observational studies and the case reports were evaluated using the CARE (Case Report) guidelines. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this review. Two case studies received an overall grade of medium and the overall quality of six studies was graded as ‘low’. All three observational studies and the only randomised controlled trial received scores of ‘medium’. Conclusion: PEEK-based dental prostheses may provide a viable and more esthetic alternative to conventional prosthodontic appliances. However, within the limitations of this study is the evidence to ascertain the long-term viability of PEEK-based dental prostheses. Future studies should focus on conducting large-scale, multicenter trials to compare the survival rate of PEEK prostheses to that of conventionally available prosthodontic appliances. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9231096/ /pubmed/35746022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Khurshid, Zohaib Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa Bencharit, Sompop Najeeb, Shariq Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title | Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title_full | Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title_fullStr | Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title_short | Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies |
title_sort | insufficient evidence to ascertain the long-term survival of peek dental prostheses: a systematic review of clinical studies |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khurshidzohaib insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies AT nedumgottilbinoymathews insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies AT aliramymoustafamoustafa insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies AT bencharitsompop insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies AT najeebshariq insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies |