Cargando…

Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khurshid, Zohaib, Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews, Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa, Bencharit, Sompop, Najeeb, Shariq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441
_version_ 1784735245933740032
author Khurshid, Zohaib
Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews
Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa
Bencharit, Sompop
Najeeb, Shariq
author_facet Khurshid, Zohaib
Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews
Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa
Bencharit, Sompop
Najeeb, Shariq
author_sort Khurshid, Zohaib
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic review aims to analyse and appraise the literature concerning PEEK dental prostheses critically. Methods: The following focused question was constructed ‘Are dental prostheses made of PEEK inferior to those made of other materials in terms of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes?’. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) tool was used for the quality assessment of the randomised clinical trials. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of observational studies and the case reports were evaluated using the CARE (Case Report) guidelines. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this review. Two case studies received an overall grade of medium and the overall quality of six studies was graded as ‘low’. All three observational studies and the only randomised controlled trial received scores of ‘medium’. Conclusion: PEEK-based dental prostheses may provide a viable and more esthetic alternative to conventional prosthodontic appliances. However, within the limitations of this study is the evidence to ascertain the long-term viability of PEEK-based dental prostheses. Future studies should focus on conducting large-scale, multicenter trials to compare the survival rate of PEEK prostheses to that of conventionally available prosthodontic appliances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9231096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92310962022-06-25 Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies Khurshid, Zohaib Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa Bencharit, Sompop Najeeb, Shariq Polymers (Basel) Systematic Review Introduction: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that is used in the construction of orthopaedic and dental implants. It is also used to construct removable and fixed dental prostheses due to its superior mechanical and esthetic properties compared to conventional materials. This systematic review aims to analyse and appraise the literature concerning PEEK dental prostheses critically. Methods: The following focused question was constructed ‘Are dental prostheses made of PEEK inferior to those made of other materials in terms of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes?’. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) tool was used for the quality assessment of the randomised clinical trials. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of observational studies and the case reports were evaluated using the CARE (Case Report) guidelines. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this review. Two case studies received an overall grade of medium and the overall quality of six studies was graded as ‘low’. All three observational studies and the only randomised controlled trial received scores of ‘medium’. Conclusion: PEEK-based dental prostheses may provide a viable and more esthetic alternative to conventional prosthodontic appliances. However, within the limitations of this study is the evidence to ascertain the long-term viability of PEEK-based dental prostheses. Future studies should focus on conducting large-scale, multicenter trials to compare the survival rate of PEEK prostheses to that of conventionally available prosthodontic appliances. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9231096/ /pubmed/35746022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Khurshid, Zohaib
Nedumgottil, Binoy Mathews
Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa
Bencharit, Sompop
Najeeb, Shariq
Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title_full Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title_fullStr Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title_full_unstemmed Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title_short Insufficient Evidence to Ascertain the Long-Term Survival of PEEK Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
title_sort insufficient evidence to ascertain the long-term survival of peek dental prostheses: a systematic review of clinical studies
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14122441
work_keys_str_mv AT khurshidzohaib insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies
AT nedumgottilbinoymathews insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies
AT aliramymoustafamoustafa insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies
AT bencharitsompop insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies
AT najeebshariq insufficientevidencetoascertainthelongtermsurvivalofpeekdentalprosthesesasystematicreviewofclinicalstudies