Cargando…

Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method

The authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in the EU is subject to the provision of evidence of safety and of the availability of reliable analytical methods. These methods represent an essential tool for official laboratories to enforce a harmonised market control. Here the validation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatto, Francesco, Savini, Christian, Sacco, Maria Grazia, Vinciguerra, Daniela, Buttinger, Gerhard, Corbisier, Philippe, Mazzara, Marco, Emons, Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109117
_version_ 1784735252133969920
author Gatto, Francesco
Savini, Christian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Vinciguerra, Daniela
Buttinger, Gerhard
Corbisier, Philippe
Mazzara, Marco
Emons, Hendrik
author_facet Gatto, Francesco
Savini, Christian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Vinciguerra, Daniela
Buttinger, Gerhard
Corbisier, Philippe
Mazzara, Marco
Emons, Hendrik
author_sort Gatto, Francesco
collection PubMed
description The authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in the EU is subject to the provision of evidence of safety and of the availability of reliable analytical methods. These methods represent an essential tool for official laboratories to enforce a harmonised market control. Here the validation of droplet digital PCR (dPCR) methods has been performed for studying if the performance and acceptance parameters set by EU and other international guidelines for the analysis of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food and feed are suitable and achievable also with such methods. The single-laboratory validation study showed that performance requirements set for GMO analysis by real time PCR can also be used to assess dPCR-based methods. Moreover, trueness and precision were assessed for both simplex and duplex formats in a multi-laboratory validation study organised according to international standards. Overall, the data on trueness, repeatability and reproducibility precision resulting from the collaborative study are satisfying the acceptance criteria for the respective parameters as stipulated in the EU and other international guidance such as the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (CCMAS). For instance, the duplex droplet dPCR method for MON810 showed relative repeatability standard deviations from 1.8% to 15.7%, while the relative reproducibility standard deviation was found to be between 2.1% and 16.5% over the dynamic range studied. Moreover, the relative bias of the dPCR methods was well below 25% across the entire dynamic range. In addition, other aspects supporting the application of digital PCR for the control of GMOs on the market were experimentally assessed such as the conversion of the measurement results from copy number ratio to mass fraction, the influence of the DNA extraction step and of the ingredient content. It was found that the DNA extraction step added only a limited contribution to the variability of the measurement results under the studied conditions. The decreasing amount of the target ingredient content may decrease the level of precision of the method, although within the acceptance range of GMO performance parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9231119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92311192022-10-01 Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method Gatto, Francesco Savini, Christian Sacco, Maria Grazia Vinciguerra, Daniela Buttinger, Gerhard Corbisier, Philippe Mazzara, Marco Emons, Hendrik Food Control Article The authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in the EU is subject to the provision of evidence of safety and of the availability of reliable analytical methods. These methods represent an essential tool for official laboratories to enforce a harmonised market control. Here the validation of droplet digital PCR (dPCR) methods has been performed for studying if the performance and acceptance parameters set by EU and other international guidelines for the analysis of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food and feed are suitable and achievable also with such methods. The single-laboratory validation study showed that performance requirements set for GMO analysis by real time PCR can also be used to assess dPCR-based methods. Moreover, trueness and precision were assessed for both simplex and duplex formats in a multi-laboratory validation study organised according to international standards. Overall, the data on trueness, repeatability and reproducibility precision resulting from the collaborative study are satisfying the acceptance criteria for the respective parameters as stipulated in the EU and other international guidance such as the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (CCMAS). For instance, the duplex droplet dPCR method for MON810 showed relative repeatability standard deviations from 1.8% to 15.7%, while the relative reproducibility standard deviation was found to be between 2.1% and 16.5% over the dynamic range studied. Moreover, the relative bias of the dPCR methods was well below 25% across the entire dynamic range. In addition, other aspects supporting the application of digital PCR for the control of GMOs on the market were experimentally assessed such as the conversion of the measurement results from copy number ratio to mass fraction, the influence of the DNA extraction step and of the ingredient content. It was found that the DNA extraction step added only a limited contribution to the variability of the measurement results under the studied conditions. The decreasing amount of the target ingredient content may decrease the level of precision of the method, although within the acceptance range of GMO performance parameters. Elsevier Science 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9231119/ /pubmed/36193189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109117 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gatto, Francesco
Savini, Christian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Vinciguerra, Daniela
Buttinger, Gerhard
Corbisier, Philippe
Mazzara, Marco
Emons, Hendrik
Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title_full Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title_fullStr Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title_full_unstemmed Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title_short Single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital PCR method
title_sort single and multi-laboratory validation of a droplet digital pcr method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109117
work_keys_str_mv AT gattofrancesco singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT savinichristian singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT saccomariagrazia singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT vinciguerradaniela singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT buttingergerhard singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT corbisierphilippe singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT mazzaramarco singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT emonshendrik singleandmultilaboratoryvalidationofadropletdigitalpcrmethod