Cargando…

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?

We sought to investigate whether quantitative parameters from a dynamic contrast-enhanced study can be used to differentiate cancer from normal tissue and to determine a cut-off value of specific parameters that can predict malignancy more accurately, compared to the obturator internus muscle as a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guljaš, Silva, Benšić, Mirta, Krivdić Dupan, Zdravka, Pavlović, Oliver, Krajina, Vinko, Pavoković, Deni, Šmit Takač, Petra, Hranić, Matija, Salha, Tamer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35736872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030124
_version_ 1784735320989761536
author Guljaš, Silva
Benšić, Mirta
Krivdić Dupan, Zdravka
Pavlović, Oliver
Krajina, Vinko
Pavoković, Deni
Šmit Takač, Petra
Hranić, Matija
Salha, Tamer
author_facet Guljaš, Silva
Benšić, Mirta
Krivdić Dupan, Zdravka
Pavlović, Oliver
Krajina, Vinko
Pavoković, Deni
Šmit Takač, Petra
Hranić, Matija
Salha, Tamer
author_sort Guljaš, Silva
collection PubMed
description We sought to investigate whether quantitative parameters from a dynamic contrast-enhanced study can be used to differentiate cancer from normal tissue and to determine a cut-off value of specific parameters that can predict malignancy more accurately, compared to the obturator internus muscle as a reference tissue. This retrospective study included 56 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa) after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), with a total of 70 lesions; 39 were located in the peripheral zone, and 31 in the transition zone. The quantitative parameters for all patients were calculated in the detected lesion, morphologically normal prostate tissue and the obturator internus muscle. Increase in the K(trans) value was determined in lesion-to-muscle ratio by 3.974368, which is a cut-off value to differentiate between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue, with specificity of 72.86% and sensitivity of 91.43%. We introduced a model to detect prostate cancer that combines K(trans) lesion-to-muscle ratio value and iAUC lesion-to-muscle ratio value, which is of higher accuracy compared to individual variables. Based on this model, we identified the optimal cut-off value with 100% sensitivity and 64.28% specificity. The use of quantitative DCE pharmacokinetic parameters compared to the obturator internus muscle as reference tissue leads to higher diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9231365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92313652022-06-25 Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It? Guljaš, Silva Benšić, Mirta Krivdić Dupan, Zdravka Pavlović, Oliver Krajina, Vinko Pavoković, Deni Šmit Takač, Petra Hranić, Matija Salha, Tamer Tomography Article We sought to investigate whether quantitative parameters from a dynamic contrast-enhanced study can be used to differentiate cancer from normal tissue and to determine a cut-off value of specific parameters that can predict malignancy more accurately, compared to the obturator internus muscle as a reference tissue. This retrospective study included 56 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa) after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), with a total of 70 lesions; 39 were located in the peripheral zone, and 31 in the transition zone. The quantitative parameters for all patients were calculated in the detected lesion, morphologically normal prostate tissue and the obturator internus muscle. Increase in the K(trans) value was determined in lesion-to-muscle ratio by 3.974368, which is a cut-off value to differentiate between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue, with specificity of 72.86% and sensitivity of 91.43%. We introduced a model to detect prostate cancer that combines K(trans) lesion-to-muscle ratio value and iAUC lesion-to-muscle ratio value, which is of higher accuracy compared to individual variables. Based on this model, we identified the optimal cut-off value with 100% sensitivity and 64.28% specificity. The use of quantitative DCE pharmacokinetic parameters compared to the obturator internus muscle as reference tissue leads to higher diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer detection. MDPI 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9231365/ /pubmed/35736872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030124 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guljaš, Silva
Benšić, Mirta
Krivdić Dupan, Zdravka
Pavlović, Oliver
Krajina, Vinko
Pavoković, Deni
Šmit Takač, Petra
Hranić, Matija
Salha, Tamer
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title_full Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title_fullStr Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title_short Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate—Can We Make Better Use of It?
title_sort dynamic contrast enhanced study in multiparametric examination of the prostate—can we make better use of it?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35736872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030124
work_keys_str_mv AT guljassilva dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT bensicmirta dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT krivdicdupanzdravka dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT pavlovicoliver dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT krajinavinko dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT pavokovicdeni dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT smittakacpetra dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT hranicmatija dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit
AT salhatamer dynamiccontrastenhancedstudyinmultiparametricexaminationoftheprostatecanwemakebetteruseofit