Cargando…

The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes

BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Gavin, Reeves, Fairleigh, Perera, Marlon, Kelly, Brian D., Esler, Stephen, Bolton, Damien, Jack, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140
_version_ 1784735394981478400
author Wei, Gavin
Reeves, Fairleigh
Perera, Marlon
Kelly, Brian D.
Esler, Stephen
Bolton, Damien
Jack, Greg
author_facet Wei, Gavin
Reeves, Fairleigh
Perera, Marlon
Kelly, Brian D.
Esler, Stephen
Bolton, Damien
Jack, Greg
author_sort Wei, Gavin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution's prostate biopsy practice patterns and outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at an Australian tertiary institution from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2020 were identified. Patients with known PCa were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: a pre‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied prior to the introduction of mpMRI subsidisation on 1 July 2018 and a post‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied after 1 July 2018. Histopathological results were compared with further stratification based on mpMRI results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and sixty‐one patients were in the pre‐subsidisation cohort and 289 in the post‐subsidisation cohort. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 36.3% underwent a pre‐biopsy mpMRI compared with 77.5% in the post‐subsidisation group. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 59.6% had positive biopsies (p = 0.024) compared with 68.2% in the post‐subsidisation group. The rate of clinically significant PCa was lower in the pre‐subsidisation group (39.1%) compared with the post‐subsidisation (49.5%, p = 0.008). The negative predictive value of mpMRI for clinically significant PCa was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: Our institution experienced a reduction of negative prostate biopsies and an increase in clinically significant PCa within transperineal biopsy specimens after the Australian healthcare system introduced financial subsidisation of mpMRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9231672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92316722022-06-30 The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes Wei, Gavin Reeves, Fairleigh Perera, Marlon Kelly, Brian D. Esler, Stephen Bolton, Damien Jack, Greg BJUI Compass To the Drawing Board BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution's prostate biopsy practice patterns and outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at an Australian tertiary institution from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2020 were identified. Patients with known PCa were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: a pre‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied prior to the introduction of mpMRI subsidisation on 1 July 2018 and a post‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied after 1 July 2018. Histopathological results were compared with further stratification based on mpMRI results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and sixty‐one patients were in the pre‐subsidisation cohort and 289 in the post‐subsidisation cohort. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 36.3% underwent a pre‐biopsy mpMRI compared with 77.5% in the post‐subsidisation group. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 59.6% had positive biopsies (p = 0.024) compared with 68.2% in the post‐subsidisation group. The rate of clinically significant PCa was lower in the pre‐subsidisation group (39.1%) compared with the post‐subsidisation (49.5%, p = 0.008). The negative predictive value of mpMRI for clinically significant PCa was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: Our institution experienced a reduction of negative prostate biopsies and an increase in clinically significant PCa within transperineal biopsy specimens after the Australian healthcare system introduced financial subsidisation of mpMRI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9231672/ /pubmed/35783586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle To the Drawing Board
Wei, Gavin
Reeves, Fairleigh
Perera, Marlon
Kelly, Brian D.
Esler, Stephen
Bolton, Damien
Jack, Greg
The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title_full The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title_fullStr The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title_short The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
title_sort impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
topic To the Drawing Board
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140
work_keys_str_mv AT weigavin theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT reevesfairleigh theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT pereramarlon theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT kellybriand theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT eslerstephen theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT boltondamien theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT jackgreg theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT weigavin impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT reevesfairleigh impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT pereramarlon impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT kellybriand impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT eslerstephen impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT boltondamien impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes
AT jackgreg impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes