Cargando…
The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes
BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140 |
_version_ | 1784735394981478400 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Gavin Reeves, Fairleigh Perera, Marlon Kelly, Brian D. Esler, Stephen Bolton, Damien Jack, Greg |
author_facet | Wei, Gavin Reeves, Fairleigh Perera, Marlon Kelly, Brian D. Esler, Stephen Bolton, Damien Jack, Greg |
author_sort | Wei, Gavin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution's prostate biopsy practice patterns and outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at an Australian tertiary institution from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2020 were identified. Patients with known PCa were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: a pre‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied prior to the introduction of mpMRI subsidisation on 1 July 2018 and a post‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied after 1 July 2018. Histopathological results were compared with further stratification based on mpMRI results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and sixty‐one patients were in the pre‐subsidisation cohort and 289 in the post‐subsidisation cohort. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 36.3% underwent a pre‐biopsy mpMRI compared with 77.5% in the post‐subsidisation group. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 59.6% had positive biopsies (p = 0.024) compared with 68.2% in the post‐subsidisation group. The rate of clinically significant PCa was lower in the pre‐subsidisation group (39.1%) compared with the post‐subsidisation (49.5%, p = 0.008). The negative predictive value of mpMRI for clinically significant PCa was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: Our institution experienced a reduction of negative prostate biopsies and an increase in clinically significant PCa within transperineal biopsy specimens after the Australian healthcare system introduced financial subsidisation of mpMRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9231672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92316722022-06-30 The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes Wei, Gavin Reeves, Fairleigh Perera, Marlon Kelly, Brian D. Esler, Stephen Bolton, Damien Jack, Greg BJUI Compass To the Drawing Board BACKGROUND: From 1 July 2018, the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) introduced rebates for multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the workup for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to determine if subsidisation of mpMRI prior to transperineal biopsy altered our institution's prostate biopsy practice patterns and outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at an Australian tertiary institution from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2020 were identified. Patients with known PCa were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: a pre‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied prior to the introduction of mpMRI subsidisation on 1 July 2018 and a post‐subsidisation cohort comprising patients biopsied after 1 July 2018. Histopathological results were compared with further stratification based on mpMRI results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and sixty‐one patients were in the pre‐subsidisation cohort and 289 in the post‐subsidisation cohort. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 36.3% underwent a pre‐biopsy mpMRI compared with 77.5% in the post‐subsidisation group. Of the patients in the pre‐subsidisation group, 59.6% had positive biopsies (p = 0.024) compared with 68.2% in the post‐subsidisation group. The rate of clinically significant PCa was lower in the pre‐subsidisation group (39.1%) compared with the post‐subsidisation (49.5%, p = 0.008). The negative predictive value of mpMRI for clinically significant PCa was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: Our institution experienced a reduction of negative prostate biopsies and an increase in clinically significant PCa within transperineal biopsy specimens after the Australian healthcare system introduced financial subsidisation of mpMRI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9231672/ /pubmed/35783586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | To the Drawing Board Wei, Gavin Reeves, Fairleigh Perera, Marlon Kelly, Brian D. Esler, Stephen Bolton, Damien Jack, Greg The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title | The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title_full | The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title_fullStr | The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title_short | The impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
title_sort | impact of health‐policy‐driven subsidisation of prostate magnetic resonance imaging on transperineal prostate biopsy practice and outcomes |
topic | To the Drawing Board |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weigavin theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT reevesfairleigh theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT pereramarlon theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT kellybriand theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT eslerstephen theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT boltondamien theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT jackgreg theimpactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT weigavin impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT reevesfairleigh impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT pereramarlon impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT kellybriand impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT eslerstephen impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT boltondamien impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes AT jackgreg impactofhealthpolicydrivensubsidisationofprostatemagneticresonanceimagingontransperinealprostatebiopsypracticeandoutcomes |