Cargando…

Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models

Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mester, Rachel, Landeros, Alfonso, Rackauckas, Chris, Lange, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598
_version_ 1784735516386656256
author Mester, Rachel
Landeros, Alfonso
Rackauckas, Chris
Lange, Kenneth
author_facet Mester, Rachel
Landeros, Alfonso
Rackauckas, Chris
Lange, Kenneth
author_sort Mester, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (a) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (b) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (c) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (d) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computational time, while the complex perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9232177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92321772022-06-25 Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models Mester, Rachel Landeros, Alfonso Rackauckas, Chris Lange, Kenneth PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (a) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (b) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (c) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (d) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computational time, while the complex perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable. Public Library of Science 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9232177/ /pubmed/35696417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598 Text en © 2022 Mester et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mester, Rachel
Landeros, Alfonso
Rackauckas, Chris
Lange, Kenneth
Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title_full Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title_fullStr Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title_full_unstemmed Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title_short Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
title_sort differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598
work_keys_str_mv AT mesterrachel differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels
AT landerosalfonso differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels
AT rackauckaschris differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels
AT langekenneth differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels