Cargando…
Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models
Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598 |
_version_ | 1784735516386656256 |
---|---|
author | Mester, Rachel Landeros, Alfonso Rackauckas, Chris Lange, Kenneth |
author_facet | Mester, Rachel Landeros, Alfonso Rackauckas, Chris Lange, Kenneth |
author_sort | Mester, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (a) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (b) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (c) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (d) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computational time, while the complex perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9232177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92321772022-06-25 Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models Mester, Rachel Landeros, Alfonso Rackauckas, Chris Lange, Kenneth PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (a) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (b) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (c) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (d) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computational time, while the complex perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable. Public Library of Science 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9232177/ /pubmed/35696417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598 Text en © 2022 Mester et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mester, Rachel Landeros, Alfonso Rackauckas, Chris Lange, Kenneth Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title | Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title_full | Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title_fullStr | Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title_short | Differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
title_sort | differential methods for assessing sensitivity in biological models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mesterrachel differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels AT landerosalfonso differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels AT rackauckaschris differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels AT langekenneth differentialmethodsforassessingsensitivityinbiologicalmodels |