Cargando…

Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()

OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesize original research on contraceptive user values, preferences, views, and concerns about specific family planning methods, as well as perspectives from health workers. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of global contraceptive user values and preferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeh, Ping Teresa, Kautsar, Hunied, Kennedy, Caitlin E, Gaffield, Mary E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011
_version_ 1784735686203539456
author Yeh, Ping Teresa
Kautsar, Hunied
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Gaffield, Mary E
author_facet Yeh, Ping Teresa
Kautsar, Hunied
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Gaffield, Mary E
author_sort Yeh, Ping Teresa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesize original research on contraceptive user values, preferences, views, and concerns about specific family planning methods, as well as perspectives from health workers. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of global contraceptive user values and preferences. We searched 10 electronic databases for qualitative and quantitative studies published from 2005 to 2020 and extracted data in duplicate using standard forms. RESULTS: Overall, 423 original research articles from 93 countries among various groups of end-users and health workers in all 6 World Health Organization regions and all 4 World Bank income classification categories met inclusion criteria. Of these, 250 (59%) articles were from high-income countries, mostly from the United States of America (n = 139), the United Kingdom (n = 29), and Australia (n = 23). Quantitative methods were used in 269 articles, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 190). Qualitative interviews were used in 116 articles and focus group discussions in 69 articles. The most commonly reported themes included side effects, effectiveness, and ease/frequency/duration of use. Interference in sex and partner relations, menstrual effects, reversibility, counseling/interactions with health workers, cost/availability, autonomy, and discreet use were also important. Users generally reported satisfaction with (and more accurate knowledge about) the methods they were using. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive users have diverse values and preferences, although there is consistency in core themes across settings. Despite the large body of literature identified and relevance to person-centered care, varied reporting of findings limited robust synthesis and quantification of the review results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9232836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92328362022-07-01 Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()() Yeh, Ping Teresa Kautsar, Hunied Kennedy, Caitlin E Gaffield, Mary E Contraception Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesize original research on contraceptive user values, preferences, views, and concerns about specific family planning methods, as well as perspectives from health workers. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of global contraceptive user values and preferences. We searched 10 electronic databases for qualitative and quantitative studies published from 2005 to 2020 and extracted data in duplicate using standard forms. RESULTS: Overall, 423 original research articles from 93 countries among various groups of end-users and health workers in all 6 World Health Organization regions and all 4 World Bank income classification categories met inclusion criteria. Of these, 250 (59%) articles were from high-income countries, mostly from the United States of America (n = 139), the United Kingdom (n = 29), and Australia (n = 23). Quantitative methods were used in 269 articles, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 190). Qualitative interviews were used in 116 articles and focus group discussions in 69 articles. The most commonly reported themes included side effects, effectiveness, and ease/frequency/duration of use. Interference in sex and partner relations, menstrual effects, reversibility, counseling/interactions with health workers, cost/availability, autonomy, and discreet use were also important. Users generally reported satisfaction with (and more accurate knowledge about) the methods they were using. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive users have diverse values and preferences, although there is consistency in core themes across settings. Despite the large body of literature identified and relevance to person-centered care, varied reporting of findings limited robust synthesis and quantification of the review results. Elsevier 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9232836/ /pubmed/35525287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Kautsar, Hunied
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Gaffield, Mary E
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title_full Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title_fullStr Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title_full_unstemmed Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title_short Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review()()
title_sort values and preferences for contraception: a global systematic review()()
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9232836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011
work_keys_str_mv AT yehpingteresa valuesandpreferencesforcontraceptionaglobalsystematicreview
AT kautsarhunied valuesandpreferencesforcontraceptionaglobalsystematicreview
AT kennedycaitline valuesandpreferencesforcontraceptionaglobalsystematicreview
AT gaffieldmarye valuesandpreferencesforcontraceptionaglobalsystematicreview