Cargando…
The opacity myth: A response to Swofford & Champod (2022)
Swofford & Champod (2022) FSI Synergy article 100220 reports the results of semi-structured interviews that asked interviewees their views on probabilistic evaluation of forensic evidence in general, and probabilistic evaluation of forensic evidence performed using computational algorithms in pa...
Autores principales: | Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Basu, Nabanita, Enzinger, Ewald, Weber, Philip |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100275 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature
por: Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science
por: Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
Publicado: (2022) -
Machine learning enthusiasts should stick to the facts. Response to Morrison et al. (2022)
por: Biedermann, Alex
Publicado: (2022) -
Evolutionary perspective of cancer: myth, metaphors, and reality
por: Arnal, Audrey, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Challenging a Myth: Directional Atherectomy
por: Reekers, Jim
Publicado: (2009)