Cargando…

Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities

BACKGROUND: There seems to be a lack of consensus on the concept and domains of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) measured among children and adolescents with developmental disabilities (DD), despite a significant number of existing measures of ADL and associated constructs, and two prevailing theore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Mo, Dutt, Anuradha S., Nair, Rahul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09698
_version_ 1784735713181302784
author Chen, Mo
Dutt, Anuradha S.
Nair, Rahul
author_facet Chen, Mo
Dutt, Anuradha S.
Nair, Rahul
author_sort Chen, Mo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There seems to be a lack of consensus on the concept and domains of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) measured among children and adolescents with developmental disabilities (DD), despite a significant number of existing measures of ADL and associated constructs, and two prevailing theoretical frameworks (i.e., the cognitive-social-practical framework, and the activity-and-participation framework). AIMS: This systematic review (SR) aims to identify articles that systematically reviewed measures of ADL for children and adolescents aged 7–18 years with DD to evaluate the quality of included articles, and describe the measures and domains identified. METHODS: and Procedures: Searches were conducted in PubMed®, Academic Search Complete® (EBSCOhost), Education Source Search® (EBSCOhost), ERIC® (EBSCOhost), and PsychInfo® (EBSCOhost). 14,931 articles were identified, and two researchers completed title screening, abstract screening, and full-text screening, with disagreements resolved. Out of these 14,931 articles, fourteen were included, which resulted in a total of 163 ADL measures. Out of the 163 ADL measures, forty-eight met the criteria and were included for analysis. PRISMA and COSMIN checklists were used to appraise the methodological quality of the included articles. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Results indicated that most of the 14 systematic review articles did not provide information on instrument development and content validity of their included measures. Analysis of the identified 48 measures of ADL and its associated constructs revealed heterogeneity in domains covered, although there were seven domains that were most often included. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Implications in terms of practice, research, and policy are further discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9233222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92332222022-06-26 Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities Chen, Mo Dutt, Anuradha S. Nair, Rahul Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: There seems to be a lack of consensus on the concept and domains of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) measured among children and adolescents with developmental disabilities (DD), despite a significant number of existing measures of ADL and associated constructs, and two prevailing theoretical frameworks (i.e., the cognitive-social-practical framework, and the activity-and-participation framework). AIMS: This systematic review (SR) aims to identify articles that systematically reviewed measures of ADL for children and adolescents aged 7–18 years with DD to evaluate the quality of included articles, and describe the measures and domains identified. METHODS: and Procedures: Searches were conducted in PubMed®, Academic Search Complete® (EBSCOhost), Education Source Search® (EBSCOhost), ERIC® (EBSCOhost), and PsychInfo® (EBSCOhost). 14,931 articles were identified, and two researchers completed title screening, abstract screening, and full-text screening, with disagreements resolved. Out of these 14,931 articles, fourteen were included, which resulted in a total of 163 ADL measures. Out of the 163 ADL measures, forty-eight met the criteria and were included for analysis. PRISMA and COSMIN checklists were used to appraise the methodological quality of the included articles. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Results indicated that most of the 14 systematic review articles did not provide information on instrument development and content validity of their included measures. Analysis of the identified 48 measures of ADL and its associated constructs revealed heterogeneity in domains covered, although there were seven domains that were most often included. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Implications in terms of practice, research, and policy are further discussed. Elsevier 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9233222/ /pubmed/35761927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09698 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Mo
Dutt, Anuradha S.
Nair, Rahul
Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title_full Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title_fullStr Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title_short Systematic review of reviews on Activities of Daily Living measures for children with developmental disabilities
title_sort systematic review of reviews on activities of daily living measures for children with developmental disabilities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09698
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmo systematicreviewofreviewsonactivitiesofdailylivingmeasuresforchildrenwithdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT duttanuradhas systematicreviewofreviewsonactivitiesofdailylivingmeasuresforchildrenwithdevelopmentaldisabilities
AT nairrahul systematicreviewofreviewsonactivitiesofdailylivingmeasuresforchildrenwithdevelopmentaldisabilities