Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that causes a respiratory disease, COVID-19. For COVID-19 testing, real-time PCR is considered gold standard and therefore many commercial SARS-Cov-2 detection kits are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine diagnostic values of 10 differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulahuseinovic, Naida, Salihefendic, Lana, Durgut, Selma, Kandic, Enis, Konjhodzic, Rijad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774833
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114
_version_ 1784735770596081664
author Mulahuseinovic, Naida
Salihefendic, Lana
Durgut, Selma
Kandic, Enis
Konjhodzic, Rijad
author_facet Mulahuseinovic, Naida
Salihefendic, Lana
Durgut, Selma
Kandic, Enis
Konjhodzic, Rijad
author_sort Mulahuseinovic, Naida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that causes a respiratory disease, COVID-19. For COVID-19 testing, real-time PCR is considered gold standard and therefore many commercial SARS-Cov-2 detection kits are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine diagnostic values of 10 different commercially available SARS-CoV-2 detection kits, based on their Ct value. METHODS: For this study thirty clinical nasopharyngeal samples were collected in ALEA Genetic Center. Twenty four of them were positive, while six were negative and used as a negative control. Positive samples were selected based on the day when first symptoms appeared. RNA was extracted using the same extraction method for all samples. For amplification and comparison of detection kits, the same RT- PCR instrument was used. RESULTS: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s kappa coefficient were estimated to evaluate diagnostic values of the tested kits. This study showed that all kits showed 100% specificity. Accuracy, sensitivity and kappa coefficient varied among examined assays. Based on clinical features, LabGun(TM) COVID-19 Assay by LabGenomics proved to be the most sensitive, the most accurate and most specific. Therefore this assay was used as a reference kit. CONCLUSION: If things from practice are taken into account, accuracy and reliability of the tested commercial kits can vary compared to those obtained in this study where results were based on ideal functioning of the kits. When choosing the convenient commercial SARS-CoV-2 detection kit using RT-PCR method, many parameters need to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9233452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92334522022-06-29 Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits Mulahuseinovic, Naida Salihefendic, Lana Durgut, Selma Kandic, Enis Konjhodzic, Rijad Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that causes a respiratory disease, COVID-19. For COVID-19 testing, real-time PCR is considered gold standard and therefore many commercial SARS-Cov-2 detection kits are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine diagnostic values of 10 different commercially available SARS-CoV-2 detection kits, based on their Ct value. METHODS: For this study thirty clinical nasopharyngeal samples were collected in ALEA Genetic Center. Twenty four of them were positive, while six were negative and used as a negative control. Positive samples were selected based on the day when first symptoms appeared. RNA was extracted using the same extraction method for all samples. For amplification and comparison of detection kits, the same RT- PCR instrument was used. RESULTS: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s kappa coefficient were estimated to evaluate diagnostic values of the tested kits. This study showed that all kits showed 100% specificity. Accuracy, sensitivity and kappa coefficient varied among examined assays. Based on clinical features, LabGun(TM) COVID-19 Assay by LabGenomics proved to be the most sensitive, the most accurate and most specific. Therefore this assay was used as a reference kit. CONCLUSION: If things from practice are taken into account, accuracy and reliability of the tested commercial kits can vary compared to those obtained in this study where results were based on ideal functioning of the kits. When choosing the convenient commercial SARS-CoV-2 detection kit using RT-PCR method, many parameters need to be considered. Academy of Medical sciences 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9233452/ /pubmed/35774833 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114 Text en © 2022 Naida Mulahuseinovic, Lana Salihefendic, Selma Durgut, Enis Kandic, Rijad Konjhodzic https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mulahuseinovic, Naida
Salihefendic, Lana
Durgut, Selma
Kandic, Enis
Konjhodzic, Rijad
Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title_full Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title_short Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits
title_sort comparative analysis of sars-cov-2 detection kits
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774833
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114
work_keys_str_mv AT mulahuseinovicnaida comparativeanalysisofsarscov2detectionkits
AT salihefendiclana comparativeanalysisofsarscov2detectionkits
AT durgutselma comparativeanalysisofsarscov2detectionkits
AT kandicenis comparativeanalysisofsarscov2detectionkits
AT konjhodzicrijad comparativeanalysisofsarscov2detectionkits