Cargando…

Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review

BACKGROUND: The number of lumbar spine surgery increased in recent years. Spinal instrumentation surgery was an integral component in the treatment of spinal pathologies, which can cause surgical site infection (SSI). Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yudistira, Andhika, Asmiragani, Syaifullah, Imran, Abdul Waris, Sugiarto, Muhammad Alwy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774842
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.115-120
_version_ 1784735772066185216
author Yudistira, Andhika
Asmiragani, Syaifullah
Imran, Abdul Waris
Sugiarto, Muhammad Alwy
author_facet Yudistira, Andhika
Asmiragani, Syaifullah
Imran, Abdul Waris
Sugiarto, Muhammad Alwy
author_sort Yudistira, Andhika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of lumbar spine surgery increased in recent years. Spinal instrumentation surgery was an integral component in the treatment of spinal pathologies, which can cause surgical site infection (SSI). Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity after spinal instrumentation surgery. The management of SSI was implant retention and removal is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this literature is to systematically review the implant removal and retention method for SSI management after spinal instrumentation surgery. METHODS: We searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect for cohort and randomized control trial studies in English, published between 2002 and 2022, which had data on patients with spinal instrumentation surgery. The underlying disease, comorbidities, common bacteria, type of infection, the onset of infection, implant removal, and retention percentage and recommendation were analyzed. Bias analysis using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment. RESULTS: We included 15 studies with a total sample were 2.584 with an average of age 15 to 66 years old. The most common organism detected were S. Aureus, MRSA, and S. Epidermis. The most common surgical procedure indications were degenerative followed by scoliosis. Implant removal and retention rate were 0-100% and 0-90,32% respectively. Implant removal is more frequently used in patients after spinal instrumentation surgery than the implant retention method. CONCLUSION: Implant retention can be performed in case of SSI is < 3 months after surgery. Implant removal is recommended if the incidence of SSI is > 3 months. Empirical antibiotics therapy is necessary to reduce the possibility of implant removal after debridement. Further studies on the effect of implant removal and retention in patients on infection recurrence, pain, and quality of life of patients are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9233457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92334572022-06-29 Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review Yudistira, Andhika Asmiragani, Syaifullah Imran, Abdul Waris Sugiarto, Muhammad Alwy Acta Inform Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The number of lumbar spine surgery increased in recent years. Spinal instrumentation surgery was an integral component in the treatment of spinal pathologies, which can cause surgical site infection (SSI). Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity after spinal instrumentation surgery. The management of SSI was implant retention and removal is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this literature is to systematically review the implant removal and retention method for SSI management after spinal instrumentation surgery. METHODS: We searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect for cohort and randomized control trial studies in English, published between 2002 and 2022, which had data on patients with spinal instrumentation surgery. The underlying disease, comorbidities, common bacteria, type of infection, the onset of infection, implant removal, and retention percentage and recommendation were analyzed. Bias analysis using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment. RESULTS: We included 15 studies with a total sample were 2.584 with an average of age 15 to 66 years old. The most common organism detected were S. Aureus, MRSA, and S. Epidermis. The most common surgical procedure indications were degenerative followed by scoliosis. Implant removal and retention rate were 0-100% and 0-90,32% respectively. Implant removal is more frequently used in patients after spinal instrumentation surgery than the implant retention method. CONCLUSION: Implant retention can be performed in case of SSI is < 3 months after surgery. Implant removal is recommended if the incidence of SSI is > 3 months. Empirical antibiotics therapy is necessary to reduce the possibility of implant removal after debridement. Further studies on the effect of implant removal and retention in patients on infection recurrence, pain, and quality of life of patients are needed. Academy of Medical sciences 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9233457/ /pubmed/35774842 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.115-120 Text en © 2022 Andhika Yudistira, Syaifullah Asmiragani, Abdul Waris Imran, Muhammad Alwy Sugiarto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Yudistira, Andhika
Asmiragani, Syaifullah
Imran, Abdul Waris
Sugiarto, Muhammad Alwy
Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title_full Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title_fullStr Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title_short Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review
title_sort surgical site infection management following spinal instrumentation surgery: implant removal vs. implant retention: an updated systematical review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774842
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2022.30.115-120
work_keys_str_mv AT yudistiraandhika surgicalsiteinfectionmanagementfollowingspinalinstrumentationsurgeryimplantremovalvsimplantretentionanupdatedsystematicalreview
AT asmiraganisyaifullah surgicalsiteinfectionmanagementfollowingspinalinstrumentationsurgeryimplantremovalvsimplantretentionanupdatedsystematicalreview
AT imranabdulwaris surgicalsiteinfectionmanagementfollowingspinalinstrumentationsurgeryimplantremovalvsimplantretentionanupdatedsystematicalreview
AT sugiartomuhammadalwy surgicalsiteinfectionmanagementfollowingspinalinstrumentationsurgeryimplantremovalvsimplantretentionanupdatedsystematicalreview