Cargando…

Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: Considering the increasing number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment, and the possible need for bracket bonding to monolithic zirconia restorations, knowledge about the preferred type of bracket (metal/ceramic) and the most efficient surface treatment is imperative to achieve accepta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin, Neshandar Asli, Hamid, Falahchai, Mehran, Safary, Sina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9884006
_version_ 1784735812287463424
author Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin
Neshandar Asli, Hamid
Falahchai, Mehran
Safary, Sina
author_facet Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin
Neshandar Asli, Hamid
Falahchai, Mehran
Safary, Sina
author_sort Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Considering the increasing number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment, and the possible need for bracket bonding to monolithic zirconia restorations, knowledge about the preferred type of bracket (metal/ceramic) and the most efficient surface treatment is imperative to achieve acceptable shear bond strength (SBS). This study aimed to assess the effect of different surface treatments and orthodontic bracket types on SBS of high-translucent zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 248 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were assigned to two groups for bonding to metal and ceramic brackets. Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 31) for the following surface treatments: no surface treatment (control group), airborne-particle abrasion (APA), tribochemical silica coating with CoJet, and CO(2) laser irradiation. The mean surface roughness (Ra value) was measured. The SBS was measured after bracket bonding and thermocycling. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Fisher exact tests, and Bonferroni correction (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean Ra value was significantly different among the surface treatment subgroups (P < 0.001). The APA and CoJet subgroups were not significantly different regarding Ra (P=0.754). All other pairwise comparisons yielded significant differences (P < 0.001). Bracket type, surface treatment, and their interaction significantly affected the SBS (P < 0.001). Ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces treated with CoJet yielded the maximum SBS while ceramic brackets bonded to control and lased surfaces resulted in minimum SBS. No significant difference was noted in the SBS of different surface treatment groups when metal brackets were used (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ceramic brackets and CoJet surface treatment would be the most appropriate combination to achieve optimal bonding to high-translucent zirconia restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9233604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92336042022-06-26 Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin Neshandar Asli, Hamid Falahchai, Mehran Safary, Sina Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: Considering the increasing number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment, and the possible need for bracket bonding to monolithic zirconia restorations, knowledge about the preferred type of bracket (metal/ceramic) and the most efficient surface treatment is imperative to achieve acceptable shear bond strength (SBS). This study aimed to assess the effect of different surface treatments and orthodontic bracket types on SBS of high-translucent zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 248 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were assigned to two groups for bonding to metal and ceramic brackets. Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 31) for the following surface treatments: no surface treatment (control group), airborne-particle abrasion (APA), tribochemical silica coating with CoJet, and CO(2) laser irradiation. The mean surface roughness (Ra value) was measured. The SBS was measured after bracket bonding and thermocycling. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Fisher exact tests, and Bonferroni correction (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean Ra value was significantly different among the surface treatment subgroups (P < 0.001). The APA and CoJet subgroups were not significantly different regarding Ra (P=0.754). All other pairwise comparisons yielded significant differences (P < 0.001). Bracket type, surface treatment, and their interaction significantly affected the SBS (P < 0.001). Ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces treated with CoJet yielded the maximum SBS while ceramic brackets bonded to control and lased surfaces resulted in minimum SBS. No significant difference was noted in the SBS of different surface treatment groups when metal brackets were used (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ceramic brackets and CoJet surface treatment would be the most appropriate combination to achieve optimal bonding to high-translucent zirconia restorations. Hindawi 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9233604/ /pubmed/35761965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9884006 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yasamin Babaee Hemmati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Babaee Hemmati, Yasamin
Neshandar Asli, Hamid
Falahchai, Mehran
Safary, Sina
Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title_full Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title_short Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
title_sort effect of different surface treatments and orthodontic bracket type on shear bond strength of high-translucent zirconia: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9884006
work_keys_str_mv AT babaeehemmatiyasamin effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandorthodonticbrackettypeonshearbondstrengthofhightranslucentzirconiaaninvitrostudy
AT neshandaraslihamid effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandorthodonticbrackettypeonshearbondstrengthofhightranslucentzirconiaaninvitrostudy
AT falahchaimehran effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandorthodonticbrackettypeonshearbondstrengthofhightranslucentzirconiaaninvitrostudy
AT safarysina effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandorthodonticbrackettypeonshearbondstrengthofhightranslucentzirconiaaninvitrostudy