Cargando…

Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takadoum, Sarah, Douilly, Grégory, de Boutray, Marie, Kabani, Sarah, Maladière, Eric, Demattei, Christophe, Lapeyrie, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02287-y
_version_ 1784735888256794624
author Takadoum, Sarah
Douilly, Grégory
de Boutray, Marie
Kabani, Sarah
Maladière, Eric
Demattei, Christophe
Lapeyrie, Philippe
author_facet Takadoum, Sarah
Douilly, Grégory
de Boutray, Marie
Kabani, Sarah
Maladière, Eric
Demattei, Christophe
Lapeyrie, Philippe
author_sort Takadoum, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. METHODS: This parallel, randomized, non-blinded study compared pain following removal of impacted third molars, with and without sutures. Patients were electronically allocated 1:1 to extraction with versus without sutures. Patients ≥ 14 years’ old scheduled for extraction of four impacted wisdom teeth under general anesthesia at three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, coagulation disorders or immunosuppression, and planned orofacial surgical procedures or emergency pain/infection. The primary objective was pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale on Day 3. Secondary outcomes were edema, trismus, healing, complications, painkiller consumption and quality of life on Day 3 and 31. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and November 2018, 100 patients were randomized. Finally, 44 patients in the Suture group and 50 patients in the Without Suture group were analyzed. Mean age was 16.5 years and 66.6% of patients were female. After adjustment on center, age and smoking, no statistical difference was seen between groups for pain on Day 3 (p = 0.904). No differences were seen for swelling, trismus, consumption of painkillers, healing, complications or quality of life. Smokers had a 3.65 times higher complications rate (p = 0.0244). CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless removal of third molars is thus a reliable technique without negative consequence on outcomes, and allows shorter operating time. Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02583997), registered 22/10/2015
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9233809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92338092022-06-27 Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial Takadoum, Sarah Douilly, Grégory de Boutray, Marie Kabani, Sarah Maladière, Eric Demattei, Christophe Lapeyrie, Philippe BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. METHODS: This parallel, randomized, non-blinded study compared pain following removal of impacted third molars, with and without sutures. Patients were electronically allocated 1:1 to extraction with versus without sutures. Patients ≥ 14 years’ old scheduled for extraction of four impacted wisdom teeth under general anesthesia at three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, coagulation disorders or immunosuppression, and planned orofacial surgical procedures or emergency pain/infection. The primary objective was pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale on Day 3. Secondary outcomes were edema, trismus, healing, complications, painkiller consumption and quality of life on Day 3 and 31. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and November 2018, 100 patients were randomized. Finally, 44 patients in the Suture group and 50 patients in the Without Suture group were analyzed. Mean age was 16.5 years and 66.6% of patients were female. After adjustment on center, age and smoking, no statistical difference was seen between groups for pain on Day 3 (p = 0.904). No differences were seen for swelling, trismus, consumption of painkillers, healing, complications or quality of life. Smokers had a 3.65 times higher complications rate (p = 0.0244). CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless removal of third molars is thus a reliable technique without negative consequence on outcomes, and allows shorter operating time. Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02583997), registered 22/10/2015 BioMed Central 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9233809/ /pubmed/35754043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02287-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Takadoum, Sarah
Douilly, Grégory
de Boutray, Marie
Kabani, Sarah
Maladière, Eric
Demattei, Christophe
Lapeyrie, Philippe
Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title_full Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title_short Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
title_sort sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02287-y
work_keys_str_mv AT takadoumsarah suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT douillygregory suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deboutraymarie suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kabanisarah suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maladiereeric suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dematteichristophe suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lapeyriephilippe suturelesssockettechniqueafterremovalofthirdmolarsamulticentricopenrandomizedcontrolledtrial