Cargando…
Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings
Headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) is a promising technique for the characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings, especially for health and environmental risk assessments, as well as forensic purposes. To date, however, no comprehensive investigation has b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04129-w |
_version_ | 1784735962630193152 |
---|---|
author | Gallidabino, Matteo D. Bylenga, Kelsey Elliott, Stephanie Irlam, Rachel C. Weyermann, Céline |
author_facet | Gallidabino, Matteo D. Bylenga, Kelsey Elliott, Stephanie Irlam, Rachel C. Weyermann, Céline |
author_sort | Gallidabino, Matteo D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) is a promising technique for the characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings, especially for health and environmental risk assessments, as well as forensic purposes. To date, however, no comprehensive investigation has been carried out to objectively assess the kinds of compound released during a discharge that can be recovered by this approach, the selectivity of the main commercially available fibres, and their relative performances for the analysis of gunshot exhausts and the discrimination of different ammunition types. This study aimed to fill this gap. Gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings from four different ammunition types were analysed by GC–MS, after extraction with four different commercial fibres: 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), 85 μm polyacrylate (PA), 65 μm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (DVB), and 85 μm carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR). Results showed that, overall, a total of 120 analytes could be observed across the cartridges, but the different tested fibres also displayed distinct performances, which were, to some extent, complementary for the characterisation of gunshot exhausts. DVB, in particular, recovered the most compounds simultaneously. On the other hand, the observed variability between measurements was also high, making it a poor candidate for (semi-)quantitative applications (e.g. estimation of time since discharge and/or source profiling). In this regard, PA demonstrated the highest potential for broad use and implementation in multi-purpose methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04129-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9234032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92340322022-06-28 Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings Gallidabino, Matteo D. Bylenga, Kelsey Elliott, Stephanie Irlam, Rachel C. Weyermann, Céline Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) is a promising technique for the characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings, especially for health and environmental risk assessments, as well as forensic purposes. To date, however, no comprehensive investigation has been carried out to objectively assess the kinds of compound released during a discharge that can be recovered by this approach, the selectivity of the main commercially available fibres, and their relative performances for the analysis of gunshot exhausts and the discrimination of different ammunition types. This study aimed to fill this gap. Gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings from four different ammunition types were analysed by GC–MS, after extraction with four different commercial fibres: 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), 85 μm polyacrylate (PA), 65 μm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (DVB), and 85 μm carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR). Results showed that, overall, a total of 120 analytes could be observed across the cartridges, but the different tested fibres also displayed distinct performances, which were, to some extent, complementary for the characterisation of gunshot exhausts. DVB, in particular, recovered the most compounds simultaneously. On the other hand, the observed variability between measurements was also high, making it a poor candidate for (semi-)quantitative applications (e.g. estimation of time since discharge and/or source profiling). In this regard, PA demonstrated the highest potential for broad use and implementation in multi-purpose methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04129-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9234032/ /pubmed/35608670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04129-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Gallidabino, Matteo D. Bylenga, Kelsey Elliott, Stephanie Irlam, Rachel C. Weyermann, Céline Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title | Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title_full | Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title_fullStr | Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title_short | Comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
title_sort | comparison of four commercial solid-phase micro-extraction (spme) fibres for the headspace characterisation and profiling of gunshot exhausts in spent cartridge casings |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04129-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gallidabinomatteod comparisonoffourcommercialsolidphasemicroextractionspmefibresfortheheadspacecharacterisationandprofilingofgunshotexhaustsinspentcartridgecasings AT bylengakelsey comparisonoffourcommercialsolidphasemicroextractionspmefibresfortheheadspacecharacterisationandprofilingofgunshotexhaustsinspentcartridgecasings AT elliottstephanie comparisonoffourcommercialsolidphasemicroextractionspmefibresfortheheadspacecharacterisationandprofilingofgunshotexhaustsinspentcartridgecasings AT irlamrachelc comparisonoffourcommercialsolidphasemicroextractionspmefibresfortheheadspacecharacterisationandprofilingofgunshotexhaustsinspentcartridgecasings AT weyermannceline comparisonoffourcommercialsolidphasemicroextractionspmefibresfortheheadspacecharacterisationandprofilingofgunshotexhaustsinspentcartridgecasings |