Cargando…

Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatments on combined Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanners and Linear Accelerators (Linacs) for radiotherapy, called MR-Linacs, often require daily contouring. Currently, deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms propagate contours from reference scans, however large shape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fransson, Samuel, Tilly, David, Strand, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.001
_version_ 1784736018053726208
author Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Strand, Robin
author_facet Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Strand, Robin
author_sort Fransson, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatments on combined Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanners and Linear Accelerators (Linacs) for radiotherapy, called MR-Linacs, often require daily contouring. Currently, deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms propagate contours from reference scans, however large shape and size changes can be troublesome. Artificial neural network (ANN) based contouring may alleviate this issue, however generally requires large datasets for training. Mitigating the problem of scarcity of data, we propose patient specific networks trained on a single dataset for each patient, for contouring onto the following datasets in an adaptive MR-Linacworkflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR-scans from 17 prostate patients treated on an MR-Linac with contours of Clinical Target Volume (CTV), bladder and rectum were utilized. U-net shaped models were trained based on the image from the first fraction of each patient, and subsequently applied onto the following treatment images. Results were compared with manual contours in terms of the Dice coefficient and Added Path Length (APL). As benchmark, contours propagated through the clinical DIR algorithm were similarly evaluated. RESULTS: In Dice coefficient the ANN output was 0.92 ± 0.03, 0.93 ± 0.07 and 0.84 ± 0.10 while for DIR 0.95 ± 0.03, 0.93 ± 0.08, 0.88 ± 0.06 for CTV, bladder and rectum respectively. Similarly, APL where 3109 ± 1642, 7250 ± 4234 and 5041 ± 2666 for ANN and 1835 ± 1621, 7236 ± 4287 and 4170 ± 2920 voxels for DIR. CONCLUSIONS: Patient specific ANN models trained on images from the first fraction of a prostate MR-Linac treatment showed similar accuracy when applied to the subsequent fraction images as a clinically implemented DIR method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92342262022-06-28 Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Strand, Robin Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatments on combined Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanners and Linear Accelerators (Linacs) for radiotherapy, called MR-Linacs, often require daily contouring. Currently, deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms propagate contours from reference scans, however large shape and size changes can be troublesome. Artificial neural network (ANN) based contouring may alleviate this issue, however generally requires large datasets for training. Mitigating the problem of scarcity of data, we propose patient specific networks trained on a single dataset for each patient, for contouring onto the following datasets in an adaptive MR-Linacworkflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR-scans from 17 prostate patients treated on an MR-Linac with contours of Clinical Target Volume (CTV), bladder and rectum were utilized. U-net shaped models were trained based on the image from the first fraction of each patient, and subsequently applied onto the following treatment images. Results were compared with manual contours in terms of the Dice coefficient and Added Path Length (APL). As benchmark, contours propagated through the clinical DIR algorithm were similarly evaluated. RESULTS: In Dice coefficient the ANN output was 0.92 ± 0.03, 0.93 ± 0.07 and 0.84 ± 0.10 while for DIR 0.95 ± 0.03, 0.93 ± 0.08, 0.88 ± 0.06 for CTV, bladder and rectum respectively. Similarly, APL where 3109 ± 1642, 7250 ± 4234 and 5041 ± 2666 for ANN and 1835 ± 1621, 7236 ± 4287 and 4170 ± 2920 voxels for DIR. CONCLUSIONS: Patient specific ANN models trained on images from the first fraction of a prostate MR-Linac treatment showed similar accuracy when applied to the subsequent fraction images as a clinically implemented DIR method. Elsevier 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9234226/ /pubmed/35769110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Strand, Robin
Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_full Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_fullStr Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_short Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_sort patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT franssonsamuel patientspecificdeeplearningbasedsegmentationformagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT tillydavid patientspecificdeeplearningbasedsegmentationformagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT strandrobin patientspecificdeeplearningbasedsegmentationformagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy