Cargando…
Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026 |
_version_ | 1784736067956506624 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Zhenquan Zhao, Jinfeng Lam, Waiching Yang, Mingmin Chen, Lu Huang, Xuelin Wei, Meirong Yang, Hui Lv, Fan Zhang, Fuyan Zeng, Jian Zhang, Guo-Ming |
author_facet | Wu, Zhenquan Zhao, Jinfeng Lam, Waiching Yang, Mingmin Chen, Lu Huang, Xuelin Wei, Meirong Yang, Hui Lv, Fan Zhang, Fuyan Zeng, Jian Zhang, Guo-Ming |
author_sort | Wu, Zhenquan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled trial was applied from May 2017 to February 2019 for the infants diagnosed as aggressive posterior-ROP, zone I or posterior zone II treatment-requiring ROP by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope and RetCam3. These infants were assigned to randomly receive either intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg conbercept or 0.25 mg ranibizumab. The recurrence rate, fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) and surgical complications were examined during the follow-up period of 6 months. Recurrent eyes were retreated by laser or another intravitreal injection within the 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 30 infant patients (60 eyes) underwent IVC and 30 patients (60 eyes) underwent IVR. A total of 10 eyes (16.67%) in the IVC group and 14 eyes (23.34%) in the IVR group developed recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ(2)=0.83, p=0.36). The postmenstrual age (PMA) at first injection was (34.60±3.47) weeks in IVC and (35.14±1.76) in IVR group. In recurrent cases, the mean PMA at second treatment were (43.31±3.85) and (43.43±3.89) weeks in the IVC and IVR group, respectively. The period between two treatments was (8.71±6.62) for the IVC and (8.29±2.56) weeks for the IVR group. All these results showed no significant statistical difference between these two groups. The fluorescein leakage were observed in the eyes of recurrent infants by FFA. There were no other complications in the two groups except for complicated cataract in three eyes. CONCLUSION: Both IVC and IVR are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP. Conbercept is a new option for treating ROP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9234416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92344162022-07-11 Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial Wu, Zhenquan Zhao, Jinfeng Lam, Waiching Yang, Mingmin Chen, Lu Huang, Xuelin Wei, Meirong Yang, Hui Lv, Fan Zhang, Fuyan Zeng, Jian Zhang, Guo-Ming Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled trial was applied from May 2017 to February 2019 for the infants diagnosed as aggressive posterior-ROP, zone I or posterior zone II treatment-requiring ROP by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope and RetCam3. These infants were assigned to randomly receive either intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg conbercept or 0.25 mg ranibizumab. The recurrence rate, fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) and surgical complications were examined during the follow-up period of 6 months. Recurrent eyes were retreated by laser or another intravitreal injection within the 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 30 infant patients (60 eyes) underwent IVC and 30 patients (60 eyes) underwent IVR. A total of 10 eyes (16.67%) in the IVC group and 14 eyes (23.34%) in the IVR group developed recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ(2)=0.83, p=0.36). The postmenstrual age (PMA) at first injection was (34.60±3.47) weeks in IVC and (35.14±1.76) in IVR group. In recurrent cases, the mean PMA at second treatment were (43.31±3.85) and (43.43±3.89) weeks in the IVC and IVR group, respectively. The period between two treatments was (8.71±6.62) for the IVC and (8.29±2.56) weeks for the IVR group. All these results showed no significant statistical difference between these two groups. The fluorescein leakage were observed in the eyes of recurrent infants by FFA. There were no other complications in the two groups except for complicated cataract in three eyes. CONCLUSION: Both IVC and IVR are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP. Conbercept is a new option for treating ROP. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9234416/ /pubmed/33637618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Wu, Zhenquan Zhao, Jinfeng Lam, Waiching Yang, Mingmin Chen, Lu Huang, Xuelin Wei, Meirong Yang, Hui Lv, Fan Zhang, Fuyan Zeng, Jian Zhang, Guo-Ming Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title | Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuzhenquan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhaojinfeng comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lamwaiching comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yangmingmin comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chenlu comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT huangxuelin comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weimeirong comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yanghui comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lvfan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhangfuyan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zengjian comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhangguoming comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial |