Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhenquan, Zhao, Jinfeng, Lam, Waiching, Yang, Mingmin, Chen, Lu, Huang, Xuelin, Wei, Meirong, Yang, Hui, Lv, Fan, Zhang, Fuyan, Zeng, Jian, Zhang, Guo-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026
_version_ 1784736067956506624
author Wu, Zhenquan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Lam, Waiching
Yang, Mingmin
Chen, Lu
Huang, Xuelin
Wei, Meirong
Yang, Hui
Lv, Fan
Zhang, Fuyan
Zeng, Jian
Zhang, Guo-Ming
author_facet Wu, Zhenquan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Lam, Waiching
Yang, Mingmin
Chen, Lu
Huang, Xuelin
Wei, Meirong
Yang, Hui
Lv, Fan
Zhang, Fuyan
Zeng, Jian
Zhang, Guo-Ming
author_sort Wu, Zhenquan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled trial was applied from May 2017 to February 2019 for the infants diagnosed as aggressive posterior-ROP, zone I or posterior zone II treatment-requiring ROP by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope and RetCam3. These infants were assigned to randomly receive either intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg conbercept or 0.25 mg ranibizumab. The recurrence rate, fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) and surgical complications were examined during the follow-up period of 6 months. Recurrent eyes were retreated by laser or another intravitreal injection within the 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 30 infant patients (60 eyes) underwent IVC and 30 patients (60 eyes) underwent IVR. A total of 10 eyes (16.67%) in the IVC group and 14 eyes (23.34%) in the IVR group developed recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ(2)=0.83, p=0.36). The postmenstrual age (PMA) at first injection was (34.60±3.47) weeks in IVC and (35.14±1.76) in IVR group. In recurrent cases, the mean PMA at second treatment were (43.31±3.85) and (43.43±3.89) weeks in the IVC and IVR group, respectively. The period between two treatments was (8.71±6.62) for the IVC and (8.29±2.56) weeks for the IVR group. All these results showed no significant statistical difference between these two groups. The fluorescein leakage were observed in the eyes of recurrent infants by FFA. There were no other complications in the two groups except for complicated cataract in three eyes. CONCLUSION: Both IVC and IVR are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP. Conbercept is a new option for treating ROP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92344162022-07-11 Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial Wu, Zhenquan Zhao, Jinfeng Lam, Waiching Yang, Mingmin Chen, Lu Huang, Xuelin Wei, Meirong Yang, Hui Lv, Fan Zhang, Fuyan Zeng, Jian Zhang, Guo-Ming Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months. METHODS: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled trial was applied from May 2017 to February 2019 for the infants diagnosed as aggressive posterior-ROP, zone I or posterior zone II treatment-requiring ROP by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope and RetCam3. These infants were assigned to randomly receive either intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg conbercept or 0.25 mg ranibizumab. The recurrence rate, fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) and surgical complications were examined during the follow-up period of 6 months. Recurrent eyes were retreated by laser or another intravitreal injection within the 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 30 infant patients (60 eyes) underwent IVC and 30 patients (60 eyes) underwent IVR. A total of 10 eyes (16.67%) in the IVC group and 14 eyes (23.34%) in the IVR group developed recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ(2)=0.83, p=0.36). The postmenstrual age (PMA) at first injection was (34.60±3.47) weeks in IVC and (35.14±1.76) in IVR group. In recurrent cases, the mean PMA at second treatment were (43.31±3.85) and (43.43±3.89) weeks in the IVC and IVR group, respectively. The period between two treatments was (8.71±6.62) for the IVC and (8.29±2.56) weeks for the IVR group. All these results showed no significant statistical difference between these two groups. The fluorescein leakage were observed in the eyes of recurrent infants by FFA. There were no other complications in the two groups except for complicated cataract in three eyes. CONCLUSION: Both IVC and IVR are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP. Conbercept is a new option for treating ROP. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9234416/ /pubmed/33637618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Wu, Zhenquan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Lam, Waiching
Yang, Mingmin
Chen, Lu
Huang, Xuelin
Wei, Meirong
Yang, Hui
Lv, Fan
Zhang, Fuyan
Zeng, Jian
Zhang, Guo-Ming
Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhenquan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhaojinfeng comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lamwaiching comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yangmingmin comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chenlu comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT huangxuelin comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weimeirong comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yanghui comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lvfan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangfuyan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zengjian comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangguoming comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofconberceptversusranibizumabtreatmentforretinopathyofprematurityamulticentralprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial