Cargando…

Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor

The formation of biofilms in dairy processing plants can reduce equipment efficiency, contribute to surface deterioration, and contaminate dairy products by releasing the microorganisms they contain, which may cause spoilage or disease. However, a more representative identification of microbial comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niboucha, Nissa, Goetz, Coralie, Sanschagrin, Laurie, Fontenille, Juliette, Fliss, Ismaïl, Labrie, Steve, Jean, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.892181
_version_ 1784736088848334848
author Niboucha, Nissa
Goetz, Coralie
Sanschagrin, Laurie
Fontenille, Juliette
Fliss, Ismaïl
Labrie, Steve
Jean, Julie
author_facet Niboucha, Nissa
Goetz, Coralie
Sanschagrin, Laurie
Fontenille, Juliette
Fliss, Ismaïl
Labrie, Steve
Jean, Julie
author_sort Niboucha, Nissa
collection PubMed
description The formation of biofilms in dairy processing plants can reduce equipment efficiency, contribute to surface deterioration, and contaminate dairy products by releasing the microorganisms they contain, which may cause spoilage or disease. However, a more representative identification of microbial communities and physico-chemical characterization requires to detach and recover adequately the entire biofilm from the surface. The aim of this study is to develop an efficient technique for in-plant biofilm sampling by growing a strain of Pseudomonas azotoformans PFl1A on stainless-steel surface in a dynamic CDC biofilm reactor system using tryptic soy broth (TSB) and milk as growth media. Different techniques, namely, swabbing, scraping, sonic brushing, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge were used and the results were compared to a standard ASTM International method using ultrasonication. Their efficiencies were evaluated by cells enumeration and scanning electron microscopy. The maximum total viable counts of 8.65 ± 0.06, 8.75 ± 0.08, and 8.71 ± 0.09 log CFU/cm(2) were obtained in TSB medium using scraping, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge, respectively, which showed no statistically significant differences with the standard method, ultrasonication (8.74 ± 0.02 log CFU/cm(2)). However, a significantly (p < 0.05) lower cell recovery of 8.57 ± 0.10 and 8.60 ± 0.00 log CFU/cm(2) compared to ultrasonication were achieved for swabbing and sonic brushing, respectively. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy showed an effective removal of biofilms by sonic brushing, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge; However, only the latter two methods guaranteed a superior release of bacterial biofilm into suspension. Nevertheless, a combination of sonication and synthetic sponge ensured dislodging of sessile cells from surface crevices. The results suggest that a sonicating synthetic sponge could be a promising method for biofilm recovery in processing plants, which can be practically used in the dairy industries as an alternative to ultrasonication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92344902022-06-28 Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor Niboucha, Nissa Goetz, Coralie Sanschagrin, Laurie Fontenille, Juliette Fliss, Ismaïl Labrie, Steve Jean, Julie Front Microbiol Microbiology The formation of biofilms in dairy processing plants can reduce equipment efficiency, contribute to surface deterioration, and contaminate dairy products by releasing the microorganisms they contain, which may cause spoilage or disease. However, a more representative identification of microbial communities and physico-chemical characterization requires to detach and recover adequately the entire biofilm from the surface. The aim of this study is to develop an efficient technique for in-plant biofilm sampling by growing a strain of Pseudomonas azotoformans PFl1A on stainless-steel surface in a dynamic CDC biofilm reactor system using tryptic soy broth (TSB) and milk as growth media. Different techniques, namely, swabbing, scraping, sonic brushing, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge were used and the results were compared to a standard ASTM International method using ultrasonication. Their efficiencies were evaluated by cells enumeration and scanning electron microscopy. The maximum total viable counts of 8.65 ± 0.06, 8.75 ± 0.08, and 8.71 ± 0.09 log CFU/cm(2) were obtained in TSB medium using scraping, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge, respectively, which showed no statistically significant differences with the standard method, ultrasonication (8.74 ± 0.02 log CFU/cm(2)). However, a significantly (p < 0.05) lower cell recovery of 8.57 ± 0.10 and 8.60 ± 0.00 log CFU/cm(2) compared to ultrasonication were achieved for swabbing and sonic brushing, respectively. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy showed an effective removal of biofilms by sonic brushing, synthetic sponge, and sonicating synthetic sponge; However, only the latter two methods guaranteed a superior release of bacterial biofilm into suspension. Nevertheless, a combination of sonication and synthetic sponge ensured dislodging of sessile cells from surface crevices. The results suggest that a sonicating synthetic sponge could be a promising method for biofilm recovery in processing plants, which can be practically used in the dairy industries as an alternative to ultrasonication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9234490/ /pubmed/35770177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.892181 Text en Copyright © 2022 Niboucha, Goetz, Sanschagrin, Fontenille, Fliss, Labrie and Jean. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Niboucha, Nissa
Goetz, Coralie
Sanschagrin, Laurie
Fontenille, Juliette
Fliss, Ismaïl
Labrie, Steve
Jean, Julie
Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title_full Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title_short Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor
title_sort comparative study of different sampling methods of biofilm formed on stainless-steel surfaces in a cdc biofilm reactor
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.892181
work_keys_str_mv AT nibouchanissa comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT goetzcoralie comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT sanschagrinlaurie comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT fontenillejuliette comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT flissismail comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT labriesteve comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor
AT jeanjulie comparativestudyofdifferentsamplingmethodsofbiofilmformedonstainlesssteelsurfacesinacdcbiofilmreactor