Cargando…

Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study

BACKGROUND: Olfaction is one of the five basic senses of human beings. As such, olfactory dysfunction seriously affects patients' quality of life and can even endanger them. In recent years, olfactory dysfunction has attracted greater research interest, and numerous studies have been published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Wen, Chen, Na, Yan, Weiheng, Pei, Pei, Wei, Yongxiang, Zhan, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.904982
_version_ 1784736109075365888
author Hu, Wen
Chen, Na
Yan, Weiheng
Pei, Pei
Wei, Yongxiang
Zhan, Xiaojun
author_facet Hu, Wen
Chen, Na
Yan, Weiheng
Pei, Pei
Wei, Yongxiang
Zhan, Xiaojun
author_sort Hu, Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Olfaction is one of the five basic senses of human beings. As such, olfactory dysfunction seriously affects patients' quality of life and can even endanger them. In recent years, olfactory dysfunction has attracted greater research interest, and numerous studies have been published on olfactory dysfunction. However, there are few studies on olfactory dysfunction through bibliometric analysis. This study aims to describe the current situation and identify the foci and potential new research directions of olfactory dysfunction using a bibliometric approach. METHODS: Articles related to olfactory dysfunction published from 2002 to 2021 were located in the Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics (London, UK). Bibliometric analyses were conducted with the CiteSpace (Chaomei Chen, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (Center for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands) software programs. RESULTS: The number of articles published each year showed an upward trend, especially in 2020, where a sharp increase had occurred due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The United States was the country with the most publications and the strongest international cooperation. In terms of institutions, the greatest number of publications from a single institution came from Dresden University of Technology. Thomas Hummel was the author who had contributed the most articles. An analysis of co-citation networks and burst keywords in the field revealed a shift from “gonadotropin-releasing hormone” and “apoptosis” earlier on to “olfactory training,” “COVID-19,” and “Parkinson's disease” more recently. “Outcome,” “COVID-19,” “infection,” and “pathogenesis” are topics of the research frontier and hotspots. CONCLUSION: More attention has been paid to olfactory dysfunction as the understanding of it has improved in the past 20 years. This study provides researchers with an objective, systematic, and comprehensive analysis of the literature on olfactory dysfunction. The current frontier areas and hotspots in the field focus on the pathological mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction after infection with COVID-19 and its different prognoses. The pathophysiological mechanism of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and COVID-19 will be a primary future research direction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92345752022-06-28 Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study Hu, Wen Chen, Na Yan, Weiheng Pei, Pei Wei, Yongxiang Zhan, Xiaojun Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Olfaction is one of the five basic senses of human beings. As such, olfactory dysfunction seriously affects patients' quality of life and can even endanger them. In recent years, olfactory dysfunction has attracted greater research interest, and numerous studies have been published on olfactory dysfunction. However, there are few studies on olfactory dysfunction through bibliometric analysis. This study aims to describe the current situation and identify the foci and potential new research directions of olfactory dysfunction using a bibliometric approach. METHODS: Articles related to olfactory dysfunction published from 2002 to 2021 were located in the Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics (London, UK). Bibliometric analyses were conducted with the CiteSpace (Chaomei Chen, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (Center for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands) software programs. RESULTS: The number of articles published each year showed an upward trend, especially in 2020, where a sharp increase had occurred due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The United States was the country with the most publications and the strongest international cooperation. In terms of institutions, the greatest number of publications from a single institution came from Dresden University of Technology. Thomas Hummel was the author who had contributed the most articles. An analysis of co-citation networks and burst keywords in the field revealed a shift from “gonadotropin-releasing hormone” and “apoptosis” earlier on to “olfactory training,” “COVID-19,” and “Parkinson's disease” more recently. “Outcome,” “COVID-19,” “infection,” and “pathogenesis” are topics of the research frontier and hotspots. CONCLUSION: More attention has been paid to olfactory dysfunction as the understanding of it has improved in the past 20 years. This study provides researchers with an objective, systematic, and comprehensive analysis of the literature on olfactory dysfunction. The current frontier areas and hotspots in the field focus on the pathological mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction after infection with COVID-19 and its different prognoses. The pathophysiological mechanism of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and COVID-19 will be a primary future research direction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9234575/ /pubmed/35770245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.904982 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Chen, Yan, Pei, Wei and Zhan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hu, Wen
Chen, Na
Yan, Weiheng
Pei, Pei
Wei, Yongxiang
Zhan, Xiaojun
Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title_full Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title_fullStr Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title_short Knowledge Mapping of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Bibliometric Study
title_sort knowledge mapping of olfactory dysfunction: a bibliometric study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.904982
work_keys_str_mv AT huwen knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy
AT chenna knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy
AT yanweiheng knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy
AT peipei knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy
AT weiyongxiang knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy
AT zhanxiaojun knowledgemappingofolfactorydysfunctionabibliometricstudy