Cargando…
Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac075 |
_version_ | 1784736149968781312 |
---|---|
author | Waqar, Mueez Roncaroli, Federico Lehrer, Eric J Palmer, Joshua D Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Braunstein, Steve Hall, Emma Aznar, Marianne De Witt Hamer, Philip C D’Urso, Pietro I Trifiletti, Daniel Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Wesseling, Pieter Borst, Gerben R |
author_facet | Waqar, Mueez Roncaroli, Federico Lehrer, Eric J Palmer, Joshua D Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Braunstein, Steve Hall, Emma Aznar, Marianne De Witt Hamer, Philip C D’Urso, Pietro I Trifiletti, Daniel Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Wesseling, Pieter Borst, Gerben R |
author_sort | Waqar, Mueez |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP—tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. RESULTS: From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0–58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1–1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18–45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%–72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P < .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P < .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P < .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51–10.73, P < .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02–0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72–2.28, P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9234755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92347552022-06-28 Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis Waqar, Mueez Roncaroli, Federico Lehrer, Eric J Palmer, Joshua D Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Braunstein, Steve Hall, Emma Aznar, Marianne De Witt Hamer, Philip C D’Urso, Pietro I Trifiletti, Daniel Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Wesseling, Pieter Borst, Gerben R Neurooncol Adv Review BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP—tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. RESULTS: From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0–58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1–1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18–45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%–72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P < .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P < .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, P < .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51–10.73, P < .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02–0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72–2.28, P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies. Oxford University Press 2022-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9234755/ /pubmed/35769410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac075 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Waqar, Mueez Roncaroli, Federico Lehrer, Eric J Palmer, Joshua D Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Braunstein, Steve Hall, Emma Aznar, Marianne De Witt Hamer, Philip C D’Urso, Pietro I Trifiletti, Daniel Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Wesseling, Pieter Borst, Gerben R Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | rapid early progression (rep) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waqarmueez rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roncarolifederico rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lehrerericj rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT palmerjoshuad rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT villanuevameyerjavier rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT braunsteinsteve rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hallemma rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aznarmarianne rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dewitthamerphilipc rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dursopietroi rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trifilettidaniel rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT quinoneshinojosaalfredo rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wesselingpieter rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT borstgerbenr rapidearlyprogressionrepofglioblastomaisanindependentnegativeprognosticfactorresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |