Cargando…

Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy

There are two major clinically described forms of IgE-dependent soy allergy: (i) a primary dietary form, linked to sensitization against soy storage proteins Gly m 5 and Glym 6, and (ii) a form included in birch-soy syndromes linked to Gly m 4, a PR-10-like allergen. This second form sometimes cause...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evrard, Bertrand, Cosme, Justine, Raveau, Marion, Junda, Maud, Michaud, Elodie, Bonnet, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.908435
_version_ 1784736191851003904
author Evrard, Bertrand
Cosme, Justine
Raveau, Marion
Junda, Maud
Michaud, Elodie
Bonnet, Benjamin
author_facet Evrard, Bertrand
Cosme, Justine
Raveau, Marion
Junda, Maud
Michaud, Elodie
Bonnet, Benjamin
author_sort Evrard, Bertrand
collection PubMed
description There are two major clinically described forms of IgE-dependent soy allergy: (i) a primary dietary form, linked to sensitization against soy storage proteins Gly m 5 and Glym 6, and (ii) a form included in birch-soy syndromes linked to Gly m 4, a PR-10-like allergen. This second form sometimes causes severe systemic reactions, even anaphylaxis, especially on consuming certain forms of soy such as soymilks or smoothies. Skin prick tests and specific IgE assays against soy whole extracts lack sensitivity. Assays of anti-Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 specific IgEs have been developed to overcome this obstacle, but they unfortunately lack specificity, especially for anti-Gly m 4. We hypothesized that the basophil activation test (BAT) using molecular soy allergens Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 would both remedy the lack of sensitivity of other tests and offer, through its mechanistic contribution, greater specificity than the assay of anti-Gly m 4 specific IgEs. This would enable the two types of soy allergy to be separately identified. In a characteristic clinical example of PR-10-induced anaphylactic reaction after consuming soymilk, we report preliminary results of Gly m 4-exclusive positivity of BAT supporting our hypothesis. It will be necessary to confirm these results on more patients in subsequent studies, and to specify the place of the BAT in an overall diagnostic strategy. Meanwhile, soy BAT using molecular allergens is a promising diagnostic tool for soy allergy and probably also for follow-up in specific immunotherapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92349352022-06-28 Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy Evrard, Bertrand Cosme, Justine Raveau, Marion Junda, Maud Michaud, Elodie Bonnet, Benjamin Front Allergy Allergy There are two major clinically described forms of IgE-dependent soy allergy: (i) a primary dietary form, linked to sensitization against soy storage proteins Gly m 5 and Glym 6, and (ii) a form included in birch-soy syndromes linked to Gly m 4, a PR-10-like allergen. This second form sometimes causes severe systemic reactions, even anaphylaxis, especially on consuming certain forms of soy such as soymilks or smoothies. Skin prick tests and specific IgE assays against soy whole extracts lack sensitivity. Assays of anti-Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 specific IgEs have been developed to overcome this obstacle, but they unfortunately lack specificity, especially for anti-Gly m 4. We hypothesized that the basophil activation test (BAT) using molecular soy allergens Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 would both remedy the lack of sensitivity of other tests and offer, through its mechanistic contribution, greater specificity than the assay of anti-Gly m 4 specific IgEs. This would enable the two types of soy allergy to be separately identified. In a characteristic clinical example of PR-10-induced anaphylactic reaction after consuming soymilk, we report preliminary results of Gly m 4-exclusive positivity of BAT supporting our hypothesis. It will be necessary to confirm these results on more patients in subsequent studies, and to specify the place of the BAT in an overall diagnostic strategy. Meanwhile, soy BAT using molecular allergens is a promising diagnostic tool for soy allergy and probably also for follow-up in specific immunotherapies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9234935/ /pubmed/35769564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.908435 Text en Copyright © 2022 Evrard, Cosme, Raveau, Junda, Michaud and Bonnet. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Allergy
Evrard, Bertrand
Cosme, Justine
Raveau, Marion
Junda, Maud
Michaud, Elodie
Bonnet, Benjamin
Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title_full Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title_fullStr Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title_short Utility of the Basophil Activation Test Using Gly m 4, Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 Molecular Allergens for Characterizing Anaphylactic Reactions to Soy
title_sort utility of the basophil activation test using gly m 4, gly m 5 and gly m 6 molecular allergens for characterizing anaphylactic reactions to soy
topic Allergy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.908435
work_keys_str_mv AT evrardbertrand utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy
AT cosmejustine utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy
AT raveaumarion utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy
AT jundamaud utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy
AT michaudelodie utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy
AT bonnetbenjamin utilityofthebasophilactivationtestusingglym4glym5andglym6molecularallergensforcharacterizinganaphylacticreactionstosoy