Cargando…

Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis

Taper implants differ greatly from anatomical teeth in shape. In this study, seven three-dimensional finite element models were established, including a conventional taper implant and six root-analog implants with different root numbers and shapes. Vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jia-Qing, Zhang, Yuan, Pang, Min, Wang, Yue-Qiu, Yuan, Jun, Peng, Hui, Zhang, Wen, Dai, Lu, Li, Hong-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.915679
_version_ 1784736195047063552
author Wang, Jia-Qing
Zhang, Yuan
Pang, Min
Wang, Yue-Qiu
Yuan, Jun
Peng, Hui
Zhang, Wen
Dai, Lu
Li, Hong-Wei
author_facet Wang, Jia-Qing
Zhang, Yuan
Pang, Min
Wang, Yue-Qiu
Yuan, Jun
Peng, Hui
Zhang, Wen
Dai, Lu
Li, Hong-Wei
author_sort Wang, Jia-Qing
collection PubMed
description Taper implants differ greatly from anatomical teeth in shape. In this study, seven three-dimensional finite element models were established, including a conventional taper implant and six root-analog implants with different root numbers and shapes. Vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loads of 100 N were applied to the models to obtain stress distribution in the implant, mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone. ANSYS was used to perform the analysis under hypothetical experimental conditions. We find the stresses in all the implants and surrounding tissues varied by loading direction, the sequence of stress magnitude is vertical load, oblique load, and then horizontal load. The maximum stress values in root-analog implants were significantly less than in the taper implant. Moreover, stress distribution in the former was equalized contrary to the concentrated stress in the latter. Root-analog implants with different root geometry also revealed a pattern: stresses in multiple-root implant models were lower than those in single-root implants under the same load. The implant with a long and rounded root distributed the stress more uniformly, and it was mainly concentrated on the implant itself and cancellous bone. However, the opposite effect was observed in the short implant on mucosa and cortical bone. The root geometry of anatomical teeth can modify their functions. A uniform-shaped implant can hardly meet their functional requirements. Thus, the root-analog implant could be a possible solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9234945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92349452022-06-28 Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis Wang, Jia-Qing Zhang, Yuan Pang, Min Wang, Yue-Qiu Yuan, Jun Peng, Hui Zhang, Wen Dai, Lu Li, Hong-Wei Front Genet Genetics Taper implants differ greatly from anatomical teeth in shape. In this study, seven three-dimensional finite element models were established, including a conventional taper implant and six root-analog implants with different root numbers and shapes. Vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loads of 100 N were applied to the models to obtain stress distribution in the implant, mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone. ANSYS was used to perform the analysis under hypothetical experimental conditions. We find the stresses in all the implants and surrounding tissues varied by loading direction, the sequence of stress magnitude is vertical load, oblique load, and then horizontal load. The maximum stress values in root-analog implants were significantly less than in the taper implant. Moreover, stress distribution in the former was equalized contrary to the concentrated stress in the latter. Root-analog implants with different root geometry also revealed a pattern: stresses in multiple-root implant models were lower than those in single-root implants under the same load. The implant with a long and rounded root distributed the stress more uniformly, and it was mainly concentrated on the implant itself and cancellous bone. However, the opposite effect was observed in the short implant on mucosa and cortical bone. The root geometry of anatomical teeth can modify their functions. A uniform-shaped implant can hardly meet their functional requirements. Thus, the root-analog implant could be a possible solution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9234945/ /pubmed/35769992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.915679 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Zhang, Pang, Wang, Yuan, Peng, Zhang, Dai and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Wang, Jia-Qing
Zhang, Yuan
Pang, Min
Wang, Yue-Qiu
Yuan, Jun
Peng, Hui
Zhang, Wen
Dai, Lu
Li, Hong-Wei
Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title_full Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title_short Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis
title_sort biomechanical comparison of six different root-analog implants and the conventional morse taper implant by finite element analysis
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9234945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.915679
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjiaqing biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangyuan biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT pangmin biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT wangyueqiu biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT yuanjun biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT penghui biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangwen biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT dailu biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis
AT lihongwei biomechanicalcomparisonofsixdifferentrootanalogimplantsandtheconventionalmorsetaperimplantbyfiniteelementanalysis