Cargando…

Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that between 12 to 25% of women who undergo an endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are dissatisfied after two years because of recurrent menstrual bleeding and/or cyclical pelvic pain, with around 15% of these women ultimately having a hysterectomy. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oderkerk, Tamara J., Beelen, Pleun, Geomini, Peggy M. A. J., Herman, Malou C., Leemans, Jaklien C., Duijnhoven, Ruben G., Bosmans, Judith E., Pannekoek, Justine N., Clark, Thomas J., Mol, Ben Willem J., Bongers, Marlies Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6
_version_ 1784736228425334784
author Oderkerk, Tamara J.
Beelen, Pleun
Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
Herman, Malou C.
Leemans, Jaklien C.
Duijnhoven, Ruben G.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Pannekoek, Justine N.
Clark, Thomas J.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
author_facet Oderkerk, Tamara J.
Beelen, Pleun
Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
Herman, Malou C.
Leemans, Jaklien C.
Duijnhoven, Ruben G.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Pannekoek, Justine N.
Clark, Thomas J.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
author_sort Oderkerk, Tamara J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is estimated that between 12 to 25% of women who undergo an endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are dissatisfied after two years because of recurrent menstrual bleeding and/or cyclical pelvic pain, with around 15% of these women ultimately having a hysterectomy. The insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) immediately after endometrial ablation may inactivate residual untreated endometrium and/or inhibit the regeneration of endometrial tissue. Furthermore, the LNG-IUS may prevent agglutination of the uterine walls preventing intrauterine adhesion formation associated with endometrial ablation. In these ways, insertion of an LNG-IUS immediately after endometrial ablation might prevent subsequent hysterectomies because of persisting uterine bleeding and cyclical pelvic pain or pain that arises de novo. Hence, we evaluate if the combination of endometrial ablation and an LNG-IUS is superior to endometrial ablation alone in terms of reducing subsequent rates of hysterectomy at two years following the initial ablative procedure. METHODS/DESIGN: We perform a multicentre randomised controlled trial in 35 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding, who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation and without contraindication for an LNG-IUS are eligible. After informed consent, participants are randomly allocated to either endometrial ablation plus LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation alone. The primary outcome is the hysterectomy rate at 24 months following endometrial ablation. Secondary outcomes include women’s satisfaction, reinterventions, complications, side effects, menstrual bleeding patterns, quality of life, societal costs. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clinicians inform women with HMB who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation about whether concomitant use of the LNG-IUS is beneficial for reducing the need for hysterectomy due to ongoing bleeding and/or pain symptoms. Trial registration Dutch Trial registration: NL7817. Registered 20 June 2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7817. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9235075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92350752022-06-28 Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial Oderkerk, Tamara J. Beelen, Pleun Geomini, Peggy M. A. J. Herman, Malou C. Leemans, Jaklien C. Duijnhoven, Ruben G. Bosmans, Judith E. Pannekoek, Justine N. Clark, Thomas J. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bongers, Marlies Y. BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: It is estimated that between 12 to 25% of women who undergo an endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are dissatisfied after two years because of recurrent menstrual bleeding and/or cyclical pelvic pain, with around 15% of these women ultimately having a hysterectomy. The insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) immediately after endometrial ablation may inactivate residual untreated endometrium and/or inhibit the regeneration of endometrial tissue. Furthermore, the LNG-IUS may prevent agglutination of the uterine walls preventing intrauterine adhesion formation associated with endometrial ablation. In these ways, insertion of an LNG-IUS immediately after endometrial ablation might prevent subsequent hysterectomies because of persisting uterine bleeding and cyclical pelvic pain or pain that arises de novo. Hence, we evaluate if the combination of endometrial ablation and an LNG-IUS is superior to endometrial ablation alone in terms of reducing subsequent rates of hysterectomy at two years following the initial ablative procedure. METHODS/DESIGN: We perform a multicentre randomised controlled trial in 35 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding, who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation and without contraindication for an LNG-IUS are eligible. After informed consent, participants are randomly allocated to either endometrial ablation plus LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation alone. The primary outcome is the hysterectomy rate at 24 months following endometrial ablation. Secondary outcomes include women’s satisfaction, reinterventions, complications, side effects, menstrual bleeding patterns, quality of life, societal costs. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clinicians inform women with HMB who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation about whether concomitant use of the LNG-IUS is beneficial for reducing the need for hysterectomy due to ongoing bleeding and/or pain symptoms. Trial registration Dutch Trial registration: NL7817. Registered 20 June 2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7817. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6. BioMed Central 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9235075/ /pubmed/35761328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Oderkerk, Tamara J.
Beelen, Pleun
Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
Herman, Malou C.
Leemans, Jaklien C.
Duijnhoven, Ruben G.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Pannekoek, Justine N.
Clark, Thomas J.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title_full Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title_fullStr Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title_short Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial
title_sort endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; mira2 trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6
work_keys_str_mv AT oderkerktamaraj endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT beelenpleun endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT geominipeggymaj endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT hermanmalouc endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT leemansjaklienc endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT duijnhovenrubeng endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT bosmansjudithe endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT pannekoekjustinen endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT clarkthomasj endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT molbenwillemj endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial
AT bongersmarliesy endometrialablationpluslevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusendometrialablationaloneinwomenwithheavymenstrualbleedingstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmira2trial