Cargando…

Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a technique to acquire nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), which is considered a rich source of breast-specific biomarkers. Originating directly from the mammary ducts, this liquid biopsy can offer insight into the process of carcinogenesis at its earliest stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patuleia, Susana I. S., Moelans, Cathy B., Koopman, Jasmijn, van Steenhoven, Julia E. C., van Dalen, Thijs, van der Pol, Carmen C., Jager, Agnes, Ausems, Margreet G. E. M., van Diest, Paul J., van der Wall, Elsken, Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8
_version_ 1784736228714741760
author Patuleia, Susana I. S.
Moelans, Cathy B.
Koopman, Jasmijn
van Steenhoven, Julia E. C.
van Dalen, Thijs
van der Pol, Carmen C.
Jager, Agnes
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
van Diest, Paul J.
van der Wall, Elsken
Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M.
author_facet Patuleia, Susana I. S.
Moelans, Cathy B.
Koopman, Jasmijn
van Steenhoven, Julia E. C.
van Dalen, Thijs
van der Pol, Carmen C.
Jager, Agnes
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
van Diest, Paul J.
van der Wall, Elsken
Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M.
author_sort Patuleia, Susana I. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a technique to acquire nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), which is considered a rich source of breast-specific biomarkers. Originating directly from the mammary ducts, this liquid biopsy can offer insight into the process of carcinogenesis at its earliest stage and therefore could be of added value to the current imaging-based breast cancer screening tools. With that in mind, it is necessary to know how well NFA is tolerated. AIM: To evaluate the participants’ tolerability of NFA compared to breast imaging screening methods and blood draws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cohorts of women underwent NFA: healthy women (n = 190), women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 137) and women at high risk of developing breast cancer (n = 48). A 0–10 discomfort score of NFA, mammography, breast MRI and blood draws, was filled in at the study visits, which took place once or annually. RESULTS: The median discomfort rate of NFA was 1, which was significantly lower than the median discomfort of mammography and breast MRI (5 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001), but significantly higher than median discomfort for blood draws (0, p < 0.001). The great majority of women would undergo the procedure again (98%) and recommend it to others (97%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that NFA was well tolerated by healthy women, women diagnosed with breast cancer and high-risk women. This makes NFA a feasible method to pursue as a potential future breast cancer early detection tool, based on resident biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL41845.041.12, NL57343.041.16 and NL11690.041.06 in trialregister.nl. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9235076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92350762022-06-28 Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer? Patuleia, Susana I. S. Moelans, Cathy B. Koopman, Jasmijn van Steenhoven, Julia E. C. van Dalen, Thijs van der Pol, Carmen C. Jager, Agnes Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. van Diest, Paul J. van der Wall, Elsken Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a technique to acquire nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), which is considered a rich source of breast-specific biomarkers. Originating directly from the mammary ducts, this liquid biopsy can offer insight into the process of carcinogenesis at its earliest stage and therefore could be of added value to the current imaging-based breast cancer screening tools. With that in mind, it is necessary to know how well NFA is tolerated. AIM: To evaluate the participants’ tolerability of NFA compared to breast imaging screening methods and blood draws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cohorts of women underwent NFA: healthy women (n = 190), women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 137) and women at high risk of developing breast cancer (n = 48). A 0–10 discomfort score of NFA, mammography, breast MRI and blood draws, was filled in at the study visits, which took place once or annually. RESULTS: The median discomfort rate of NFA was 1, which was significantly lower than the median discomfort of mammography and breast MRI (5 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001), but significantly higher than median discomfort for blood draws (0, p < 0.001). The great majority of women would undergo the procedure again (98%) and recommend it to others (97%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that NFA was well tolerated by healthy women, women diagnosed with breast cancer and high-risk women. This makes NFA a feasible method to pursue as a potential future breast cancer early detection tool, based on resident biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL41845.041.12, NL57343.041.16 and NL11690.041.06 in trialregister.nl. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8. BioMed Central 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9235076/ /pubmed/35761221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Patuleia, Susana I. S.
Moelans, Cathy B.
Koopman, Jasmijn
van Steenhoven, Julia E. C.
van Dalen, Thijs
van der Pol, Carmen C.
Jager, Agnes
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
van Diest, Paul J.
van der Wall, Elsken
Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M.
Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title_full Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title_fullStr Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title_short Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
title_sort patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8
work_keys_str_mv AT patuleiasusanais patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT moelanscathyb patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT koopmanjasmijn patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT vansteenhovenjuliaec patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT vandalenthijs patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT vanderpolcarmenc patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT jageragnes patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT ausemsmargreetgem patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT vandiestpaulj patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT vanderwallelsken patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer
AT suijkerbuijkkarijnpm patientcenteredresearchhowdowomentoleratenipplefluidaspirationasapotentialscreeningtoolforbreastcancer