Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: A growing body of research suggests that methylated genes can be used as early diagnostic markers for cancer. Some studies on methylated Syndecan 2 (SDC2) have shown that it has a great diagnostic ability in colorectal cancer. This meta-analysis was aimed to estimate the diagnostic perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02395-7 |
_version_ | 1784736250346864640 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lixing Liu, Yu Zhang, Duohan Xiong, Xiaoliang Hao, Tingting Zhong, Lili Zhao, Yinlong |
author_facet | Wang, Lixing Liu, Yu Zhang, Duohan Xiong, Xiaoliang Hao, Tingting Zhong, Lili Zhao, Yinlong |
author_sort | Wang, Lixing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A growing body of research suggests that methylated genes can be used as early diagnostic markers for cancer. Some studies on methylated Syndecan 2 (SDC2) have shown that it has a great diagnostic ability in colorectal cancer. This meta-analysis was aimed to estimate the diagnostic performance of methylated SDC2 as a potential novel biomarker to screen for the colorectal cancer. METHODS: Two independent researchers conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify all relevant studies on SDC2 methylation for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer from inception to March 1, 2021. By using STATA and Revman software, the data were analyzed using a Bivariate mixed model. The quality of each study was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies comprised of 1574 colorectal cancer patients and 1945 healthy people were included in our meta-analysis. Bivariate analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–0.86], specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), positive likelihood ratio of 15.29 (95% CI 10.83–21.60), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.15–0.27). The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary ROC curve for diagnosing colorectal cancer were 74.42 (95% CI45.44–121.89) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97), respectively. For adenomas, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.47 (95% CI 0.34–0.61) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.92–0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that methylated SDC2 could be considered as a potential novel biomarker to screen for colorectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02395-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9235166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92351662022-06-28 Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis Wang, Lixing Liu, Yu Zhang, Duohan Xiong, Xiaoliang Hao, Tingting Zhong, Lili Zhao, Yinlong BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: A growing body of research suggests that methylated genes can be used as early diagnostic markers for cancer. Some studies on methylated Syndecan 2 (SDC2) have shown that it has a great diagnostic ability in colorectal cancer. This meta-analysis was aimed to estimate the diagnostic performance of methylated SDC2 as a potential novel biomarker to screen for the colorectal cancer. METHODS: Two independent researchers conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify all relevant studies on SDC2 methylation for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer from inception to March 1, 2021. By using STATA and Revman software, the data were analyzed using a Bivariate mixed model. The quality of each study was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies comprised of 1574 colorectal cancer patients and 1945 healthy people were included in our meta-analysis. Bivariate analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–0.86], specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), positive likelihood ratio of 15.29 (95% CI 10.83–21.60), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.15–0.27). The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary ROC curve for diagnosing colorectal cancer were 74.42 (95% CI45.44–121.89) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97), respectively. For adenomas, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.47 (95% CI 0.34–0.61) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.92–0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that methylated SDC2 could be considered as a potential novel biomarker to screen for colorectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02395-7. BioMed Central 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9235166/ /pubmed/35754025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02395-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Lixing Liu, Yu Zhang, Duohan Xiong, Xiaoliang Hao, Tingting Zhong, Lili Zhao, Yinlong Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA-based SDC2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of dna-based sdc2 methylation test in colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02395-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglixing diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT liuyu diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT zhangduohan diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT xiongxiaoliang diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT haotingting diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT zhonglili diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis AT zhaoyinlong diagnosticaccuracyofdnabasedsdc2methylationtestincolorectalcancerscreeningametaanalysis |