Cargando…

Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Shengjia, Min, Shaoxiong, Wang, Suwei, Jin, Anmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w
_version_ 1784736259663462400
author Huang, Shengjia
Min, Shaoxiong
Wang, Suwei
Jin, Anmin
author_facet Huang, Shengjia
Min, Shaoxiong
Wang, Suwei
Jin, Anmin
author_sort Huang, Shengjia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. METHODS: A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. RESULTS: Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9235194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92351942022-06-28 Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis Huang, Shengjia Min, Shaoxiong Wang, Suwei Jin, Anmin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. METHODS: A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. RESULTS: Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery. BioMed Central 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9235194/ /pubmed/35761228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Shengjia
Min, Shaoxiong
Wang, Suwei
Jin, Anmin
Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w
work_keys_str_mv AT huangshengjia biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT minshaoxiong biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangsuwei biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT jinanmin biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis