Cargando…
Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation throug...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w |
_version_ | 1784736259663462400 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Shengjia Min, Shaoxiong Wang, Suwei Jin, Anmin |
author_facet | Huang, Shengjia Min, Shaoxiong Wang, Suwei Jin, Anmin |
author_sort | Huang, Shengjia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. METHODS: A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. RESULTS: Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9235194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92351942022-06-28 Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis Huang, Shengjia Min, Shaoxiong Wang, Suwei Jin, Anmin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. METHODS: A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. RESULTS: Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery. BioMed Central 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9235194/ /pubmed/35761228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Shengjia Min, Shaoxiong Wang, Suwei Jin, Anmin Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title | Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title_full | Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title_short | Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
title_sort | biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05553-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangshengjia biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis AT minshaoxiong biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis AT wangsuwei biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis AT jinanmin biomechanicaleffectsofanobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposterioraugmentationafiniteelementanalysis |