Cargando…

Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches

BACKGROUND: A disease severity classification system is widely used to predict the survival of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with different diagnoses. In the present study, conventional severity classification systems were compared with artificial intelligence predictive models (Artif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirzakhani, Farzad, Sadoughi, Farahnaz, Hatami, Mahboobeh, Amirabadizadeh, Alireza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9
_version_ 1784736261278269440
author Mirzakhani, Farzad
Sadoughi, Farahnaz
Hatami, Mahboobeh
Amirabadizadeh, Alireza
author_facet Mirzakhani, Farzad
Sadoughi, Farahnaz
Hatami, Mahboobeh
Amirabadizadeh, Alireza
author_sort Mirzakhani, Farzad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A disease severity classification system is widely used to predict the survival of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with different diagnoses. In the present study, conventional severity classification systems were compared with artificial intelligence predictive models (Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree) in terms of the prediction of the survival rate of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed on the data of the patients admitted to the ICU of Ghaemshahr’s Razi Teaching Care Center from March 20th, 2017, to September 22nd, 2019. The required data for calculating conventional severity classification models (SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, and APACHE IV) were collected from the patients’ medical records. Subsequently, the score of each model was calculated. Artificial intelligence predictive models (Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree) were developed in the next step. Lastly, the performance of each model in predicting the survival of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit was evaluated using the criteria of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-measure, and area under the ROC curve. Also, each model was validated externally. The R program, version 4.1, was used to create the artificial intelligence models, and SPSS Statistics Software, version 21, was utilized to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve of SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, APACHE IV, multilayer perceptron artificial neural network, and CART decision tree were 76.0, 77.1, 80.3, 78.5, 84.1, and 80.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results showed that although the APACHE II model had better results than other conventional models in predicting the survival rate of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit, the other conventional models provided acceptable results too. Moreover, the findings showed that the artificial neural network model had the best performance among all the studied models, indicating the discrimination power of this model in predicting patient survival compared to the other models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9235201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92352012022-06-28 Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches Mirzakhani, Farzad Sadoughi, Farahnaz Hatami, Mahboobeh Amirabadizadeh, Alireza BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: A disease severity classification system is widely used to predict the survival of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with different diagnoses. In the present study, conventional severity classification systems were compared with artificial intelligence predictive models (Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree) in terms of the prediction of the survival rate of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed on the data of the patients admitted to the ICU of Ghaemshahr’s Razi Teaching Care Center from March 20th, 2017, to September 22nd, 2019. The required data for calculating conventional severity classification models (SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, and APACHE IV) were collected from the patients’ medical records. Subsequently, the score of each model was calculated. Artificial intelligence predictive models (Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree) were developed in the next step. Lastly, the performance of each model in predicting the survival of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit was evaluated using the criteria of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-measure, and area under the ROC curve. Also, each model was validated externally. The R program, version 4.1, was used to create the artificial intelligence models, and SPSS Statistics Software, version 21, was utilized to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve of SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, APACHE IV, multilayer perceptron artificial neural network, and CART decision tree were 76.0, 77.1, 80.3, 78.5, 84.1, and 80.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results showed that although the APACHE II model had better results than other conventional models in predicting the survival rate of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit, the other conventional models provided acceptable results too. Moreover, the findings showed that the artificial neural network model had the best performance among all the studied models, indicating the discrimination power of this model in predicting patient survival compared to the other models. BioMed Central 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9235201/ /pubmed/35761275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mirzakhani, Farzad
Sadoughi, Farahnaz
Hatami, Mahboobeh
Amirabadizadeh, Alireza
Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title_full Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title_fullStr Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title_full_unstemmed Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title_short Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
title_sort which model is superior in predicting icu survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzakhanifarzad whichmodelissuperiorinpredictingicusurvivalartificialintelligenceversusconventionalapproaches
AT sadoughifarahnaz whichmodelissuperiorinpredictingicusurvivalartificialintelligenceversusconventionalapproaches
AT hatamimahboobeh whichmodelissuperiorinpredictingicusurvivalartificialintelligenceversusconventionalapproaches
AT amirabadizadehalireza whichmodelissuperiorinpredictingicusurvivalartificialintelligenceversusconventionalapproaches