Cargando…

Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that dental restorations with rough surfaces can have several disadvantages such as pigment retention or plaque accumulation, which can facilitate caries formation, color variation, loss of brightness, degradation of restoration, among others. The present study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea, Castro-Ramirez, Leonor, Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela, Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis, Cachay-Criado, Hernán, Alvino-Vales, María, Garcia-Luna, Goretty, López-Gurreonero, Carlos, Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto, Cayo-Rojas, César F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w
_version_ 1784736280689508352
author Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea
Castro-Ramirez, Leonor
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Alvino-Vales, María
Garcia-Luna, Goretty
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cayo-Rojas, César F.
author_facet Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea
Castro-Ramirez, Leonor
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Alvino-Vales, María
Garcia-Luna, Goretty
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cayo-Rojas, César F.
author_sort Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that dental restorations with rough surfaces can have several disadvantages such as pigment retention or plaque accumulation, which can facilitate caries formation, color variation, loss of brightness, degradation of restoration, among others. The present study aimed to assess surface roughness in bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without polishing, controlling the oxygen inhibited layer. METHODS: This in vitro and longitudinal experimental study consisted of 120 resin blocks of 6 mm diameter and 4 mm depth, divided into two groups: Bulk Fill (Tetric(®) N-Ceram Bulk-fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, Filtek™ Bulk Fill) and conventional nanohybrid (Tetric(®) N-Ceram, Opallis EA2, Filtek™ Z250 XT). Each resin group was divided into two equal parts, placing glycerin only on one of them, in order to control the oxygen inhibited layer. Subsequently, the surface roughness was measured before and after the polishing procedure with Sof-Lex discs. The data were analyzed with the T-test for related measures, and for comparison between groups before and after polishing, the non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test with the Bonferroni post hoc was used, considering a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Before polishing, the resin composites with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.383 ± 0.186 µm) and Opallis EA2 (0.430 ± 0. 177 µm) with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively; while after polishing, those with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.213 ± 0.214 µm) and Tetric N-Ceram (0.097 ± 0.099 µm), with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively. Furthermore, before and after polishing, all resins significantly decreased their surface roughness (p < 0.05) except Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control (p = 0.125). However, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control presented lower surface roughness both before and after polishing, being these values similar at both times. However, after polishing the other bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, the surface roughness decreased significantly in all groups, being this decrease similar in all of them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9235274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92352742022-06-28 Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea Castro-Ramirez, Leonor Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Cachay-Criado, Hernán Alvino-Vales, María Garcia-Luna, Goretty López-Gurreonero, Carlos Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto Cayo-Rojas, César F. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that dental restorations with rough surfaces can have several disadvantages such as pigment retention or plaque accumulation, which can facilitate caries formation, color variation, loss of brightness, degradation of restoration, among others. The present study aimed to assess surface roughness in bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without polishing, controlling the oxygen inhibited layer. METHODS: This in vitro and longitudinal experimental study consisted of 120 resin blocks of 6 mm diameter and 4 mm depth, divided into two groups: Bulk Fill (Tetric(®) N-Ceram Bulk-fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, Filtek™ Bulk Fill) and conventional nanohybrid (Tetric(®) N-Ceram, Opallis EA2, Filtek™ Z250 XT). Each resin group was divided into two equal parts, placing glycerin only on one of them, in order to control the oxygen inhibited layer. Subsequently, the surface roughness was measured before and after the polishing procedure with Sof-Lex discs. The data were analyzed with the T-test for related measures, and for comparison between groups before and after polishing, the non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test with the Bonferroni post hoc was used, considering a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Before polishing, the resin composites with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.383 ± 0.186 µm) and Opallis EA2 (0.430 ± 0. 177 µm) with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively; while after polishing, those with the lowest surface roughness were Opus Bulk Fill APS (0.213 ± 0.214 µm) and Tetric N-Ceram (0.097 ± 0.099 µm), with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, respectively. Furthermore, before and after polishing, all resins significantly decreased their surface roughness (p < 0.05) except Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control (p = 0.125). However, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Opus Bulk Fill APS resin with oxygen inhibited layer control presented lower surface roughness both before and after polishing, being these values similar at both times. However, after polishing the other bulk fill and conventional nanohybrid resins with and without oxygen inhibited layer control, the surface roughness decreased significantly in all groups, being this decrease similar in all of them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w. BioMed Central 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9235274/ /pubmed/35754035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gaviria-Martinez, Andrea
Castro-Ramirez, Leonor
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Alvino-Vales, María
Garcia-Luna, Goretty
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cayo-Rojas, César F.
Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title_full Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title_fullStr Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title_short Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
title_sort surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02297-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gaviriamartinezandrea surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT castroramirezleonor surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT laderacastanedamarysela surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT cervantesganozaluis surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT cachaycriadohernan surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT alvinovalesmaria surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT garcialunagoretty surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT lopezgurreonerocarlos surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT cornejopintoalberto surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy
AT cayorojascesarf surfaceroughnessandoxygeninhibitedlayercontrolinbulkfillandconventionalnanohybridresincompositeswithandwithoutpolishinginvitrostudy