Cargando…

Enhanced virtual crossmatch in intestinal transplantation: association with outcomes and application in practice

BACKGROUND: The presence of preformed donor-specific antibodies in recipient serum against anti-human leukocyte antigen is a significant risk factor that negatively affects the outcomes of intestinal transplantation. Avoiding high-risk intestinal transplantation by physical and virtual cross matches...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Jang Il, Ko, Huaibin M, Iyer, Kishore R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Transplantation 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769851
http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/kjt.21.0028
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The presence of preformed donor-specific antibodies in recipient serum against anti-human leukocyte antigen is a significant risk factor that negatively affects the outcomes of intestinal transplantation. Avoiding high-risk intestinal transplantation by physical and virtual cross matches has had limited success due to time constraints and ineffective correlation, respectively. METHODS: We developed a guideline to improve the association between physical and virtual cross matches using the retrospective data of 56 consecutive primary adult isolated intestinal transplantations from a single center. RESULTS: The mean fluorescence intensity of 2,000 for positive donor-specific antibodies revealed the best association between physical and virtual cross matches among different cut-off values, but with an unacceptable false positive rate of 54%. An enhanced virtual cross match with the summation of the mean fluorescence intensity of each anti-human leukocyte antigen improved the association between physical and virtual cross matches, with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: This enhanced virtual cross match more effectively predicts high-risk intestinal transplantation and is a better substitute for physical cross-match than the current virtual cross match. It also helps to avoid ill-considered abandonment of intestinal transplantation that is unnecessarily deemed high risk based on a simple virtual cross match.