Cargando…

Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of postoperative ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) on refraction, visual acuity and subjective satisfaction after myopic laser-in-situ-keratomileusis (LASIK) by a comprehensive analysis, which includes clinically relevant data and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIAL AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nöthel, Johanna, Katz, Toam, Druchkiv, Vasyl, Frings, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S352410
_version_ 1784736534038052864
author Nöthel, Johanna
Katz, Toam
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Frings, Andreas
author_facet Nöthel, Johanna
Katz, Toam
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Frings, Andreas
author_sort Nöthel, Johanna
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of postoperative ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) on refraction, visual acuity and subjective satisfaction after myopic laser-in-situ-keratomileusis (LASIK) by a comprehensive analysis, which includes clinically relevant data and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the influence of ORA, comparison groups were built following Archer et al. Myopic patients were subdivided by the fraction ORA/MRC (matched and not matched for MRC) (MRC = manifest refractive cylinder), ORA magnitude and CA magnitude in high ORA eyes (CA = corneal astigmatism). Refractive and visual data were analyzed via retrospective cross-sectional analysis for multiple parameters. The subjective satisfaction was analyzed retrospectively 3–4 years after having LASIK via patient reported outcome analysis. RESULTS: Refractive outcome: Only when grouped by ORA magnitude only, high ORA eyes resulted in approximately twice as cylinder magnitude compared to eyes with preoperative lower ORA. Furthermore, there appeared to be no statistically significant differences in any case. Visual outcome: There appeared to be no statistically significant differences for visual acuity parameters (safety index, efficacy index). Patient reported outcome: When grouped by the rate of ORA/MRC not matching for MRC, there were statistically significant differences in the subjective satisfaction (p = 0.006) and the postoperative side effects (p = 0.001, p = 0.01, p = 0.006), those differences appeared less strong when matched for MRC treated and result better for a higher ratio of ORA/MRC. CONCLUSION: Patients with postoperatively high ORA report on higher satisfaction with treatment results than patients with postoperatively low ORA. This did not correlate with differences in the refractive nor visual outcome. As a matter of fact, there is a discrepancy between the objective analysis results and the subjective satisfaction of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9236448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92364482022-06-28 Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Nöthel, Johanna Katz, Toam Druchkiv, Vasyl Frings, Andreas Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of postoperative ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) on refraction, visual acuity and subjective satisfaction after myopic laser-in-situ-keratomileusis (LASIK) by a comprehensive analysis, which includes clinically relevant data and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the influence of ORA, comparison groups were built following Archer et al. Myopic patients were subdivided by the fraction ORA/MRC (matched and not matched for MRC) (MRC = manifest refractive cylinder), ORA magnitude and CA magnitude in high ORA eyes (CA = corneal astigmatism). Refractive and visual data were analyzed via retrospective cross-sectional analysis for multiple parameters. The subjective satisfaction was analyzed retrospectively 3–4 years after having LASIK via patient reported outcome analysis. RESULTS: Refractive outcome: Only when grouped by ORA magnitude only, high ORA eyes resulted in approximately twice as cylinder magnitude compared to eyes with preoperative lower ORA. Furthermore, there appeared to be no statistically significant differences in any case. Visual outcome: There appeared to be no statistically significant differences for visual acuity parameters (safety index, efficacy index). Patient reported outcome: When grouped by the rate of ORA/MRC not matching for MRC, there were statistically significant differences in the subjective satisfaction (p = 0.006) and the postoperative side effects (p = 0.001, p = 0.01, p = 0.006), those differences appeared less strong when matched for MRC treated and result better for a higher ratio of ORA/MRC. CONCLUSION: Patients with postoperatively high ORA report on higher satisfaction with treatment results than patients with postoperatively low ORA. This did not correlate with differences in the refractive nor visual outcome. As a matter of fact, there is a discrepancy between the objective analysis results and the subjective satisfaction of patients. Dove 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9236448/ /pubmed/35770247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S352410 Text en © 2022 Nöthel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nöthel, Johanna
Katz, Toam
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Frings, Andreas
Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_fullStr Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_short Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_sort effect of postoperative ocular residual astigmatism (ora) on treatment outcome after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S352410
work_keys_str_mv AT notheljohanna effectofpostoperativeocularresidualastigmatismoraontreatmentoutcomeaftermyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT katztoam effectofpostoperativeocularresidualastigmatismoraontreatmentoutcomeaftermyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT druchkivvasyl effectofpostoperativeocularresidualastigmatismoraontreatmentoutcomeaftermyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT fringsandreas effectofpostoperativeocularresidualastigmatismoraontreatmentoutcomeaftermyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusislasik