Cargando…

Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study

PURPOSE: In the absence of literature allowing for an evidence-based approach to therapeutic patient education (TPE) in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (OD), this study aims to reach a consensus of experts on the content of a competency framework of an educational program for OD patients and their informal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghaddar, Zahya, Matar, Nayla, Noujaim, Joyce, Diep, Anh Nguyet, Tohmé, Aline, Pétré, Benoit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769338
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S364520
_version_ 1784736558460436480
author Ghaddar, Zahya
Matar, Nayla
Noujaim, Joyce
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Tohmé, Aline
Pétré, Benoit
author_facet Ghaddar, Zahya
Matar, Nayla
Noujaim, Joyce
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Tohmé, Aline
Pétré, Benoit
author_sort Ghaddar, Zahya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the absence of literature allowing for an evidence-based approach to therapeutic patient education (TPE) in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (OD), this study aims to reach a consensus of experts on the content of a competency framework of an educational program for OD patients and their informal caregivers (ICGs). METHODS: We used the Delphi consensus-building method. Four categories of experts were recruited: 12 patients, 17 ICGs, 46 healthcare professionals (HCP) (experienced in OD, not necessarily certified in TPE), and 19 experts in TPE (trained individuals to set up and run TPE programs not necessarily HCPs). The content of the questionnaire of the first round (R) was established according to the result of a scoping review and the opinion of an expert committee. We carried out three rounds. In R1 and R2, we collected the opinions on the relevance (7-point Likert-type scale) and on comprehensiveness (YES/No question and asking participants to propose additional content). Participants were also invited to leave comments on each objective. In R3, we asked the participants to give their opinion about the relevance of the objectives again and asked them to rank the themes from highest to lowest priority. RESULTS: Objectives were considered relevant for all participants if they reached consensus when the interquartile (IQR) ≤ 1, and if the median indicated agreement (Mdn ≥ 6) (6= appropriate, 7 = totally appropriate). Following three rounds, the final content of the educational program is composed of 23 educational objectives organized in 13 themes with an agreement about relevance amongst all participants (Mdn ≥ 6; IQR ≤ 1). The comprehensiveness criterion received also a consensus (IQR ≤ 1). The participants ranked the theme “normal swallowing vs difficulty swallowing” as the highest priority. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study resulted in a consensus, on the content of a competency framework of an educational program for OD patients and their ICGs. Further steps are needed to construct learning activities based on these objectives before testing their feasibility and efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9236548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92365482022-06-28 Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study Ghaddar, Zahya Matar, Nayla Noujaim, Joyce Diep, Anh Nguyet Tohmé, Aline Pétré, Benoit Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: In the absence of literature allowing for an evidence-based approach to therapeutic patient education (TPE) in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (OD), this study aims to reach a consensus of experts on the content of a competency framework of an educational program for OD patients and their informal caregivers (ICGs). METHODS: We used the Delphi consensus-building method. Four categories of experts were recruited: 12 patients, 17 ICGs, 46 healthcare professionals (HCP) (experienced in OD, not necessarily certified in TPE), and 19 experts in TPE (trained individuals to set up and run TPE programs not necessarily HCPs). The content of the questionnaire of the first round (R) was established according to the result of a scoping review and the opinion of an expert committee. We carried out three rounds. In R1 and R2, we collected the opinions on the relevance (7-point Likert-type scale) and on comprehensiveness (YES/No question and asking participants to propose additional content). Participants were also invited to leave comments on each objective. In R3, we asked the participants to give their opinion about the relevance of the objectives again and asked them to rank the themes from highest to lowest priority. RESULTS: Objectives were considered relevant for all participants if they reached consensus when the interquartile (IQR) ≤ 1, and if the median indicated agreement (Mdn ≥ 6) (6= appropriate, 7 = totally appropriate). Following three rounds, the final content of the educational program is composed of 23 educational objectives organized in 13 themes with an agreement about relevance amongst all participants (Mdn ≥ 6; IQR ≤ 1). The comprehensiveness criterion received also a consensus (IQR ≤ 1). The participants ranked the theme “normal swallowing vs difficulty swallowing” as the highest priority. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study resulted in a consensus, on the content of a competency framework of an educational program for OD patients and their ICGs. Further steps are needed to construct learning activities based on these objectives before testing their feasibility and efficacy. Dove 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9236548/ /pubmed/35769338 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S364520 Text en © 2022 Ghaddar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ghaddar, Zahya
Matar, Nayla
Noujaim, Joyce
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Tohmé, Aline
Pétré, Benoit
Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title_full Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title_fullStr Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title_short Consensus on the Objectives of an Educational Intervention for Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Their Informal Caregivers: A Delphi Study
title_sort consensus on the objectives of an educational intervention for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and their informal caregivers: a delphi study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769338
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S364520
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaddarzahya consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy
AT matarnayla consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy
AT noujaimjoyce consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy
AT diepanhnguyet consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy
AT tohmealine consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy
AT petrebenoit consensusontheobjectivesofaneducationalinterventionforpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagiaandtheirinformalcaregiversadelphistudy