Cargando…

Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court

INTRODUCTION: As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Bradley, Kunkel, Tara, Bryant, Kristina, Hedden, Bethany, Andraka-Christou, Barbara, O'Neil, Meghan, Huynh, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35779292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833
_version_ 1784736643384606720
author Ray, Bradley
Kunkel, Tara
Bryant, Kristina
Hedden, Bethany
Andraka-Christou, Barbara
O'Neil, Meghan
Huynh, Philip
author_facet Ray, Bradley
Kunkel, Tara
Bryant, Kristina
Hedden, Bethany
Andraka-Christou, Barbara
O'Neil, Meghan
Huynh, Philip
author_sort Ray, Bradley
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience. METHODS: The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery. RESULTS: Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual. CONCLUSIONS: Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9236911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92369112022-06-28 Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court Ray, Bradley Kunkel, Tara Bryant, Kristina Hedden, Bethany Andraka-Christou, Barbara O'Neil, Meghan Huynh, Philip J Subst Abuse Treat Article INTRODUCTION: As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience. METHODS: The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery. RESULTS: Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual. CONCLUSIONS: Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future. Elsevier Inc. 2022-09 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9236911/ /pubmed/35779292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ray, Bradley
Kunkel, Tara
Bryant, Kristina
Hedden, Bethany
Andraka-Christou, Barbara
O'Neil, Meghan
Huynh, Philip
Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title_full Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title_fullStr Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title_full_unstemmed Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title_short Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
title_sort client attitudes toward virtual treatment court
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9236911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35779292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833
work_keys_str_mv AT raybradley clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT kunkeltara clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT bryantkristina clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT heddenbethany clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT andrakachristoubarbara clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT oneilmeghan clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt
AT huynhphilip clientattitudestowardvirtualtreatmentcourt