Cargando…

The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations

PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Del Giudice, Francesco, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Pecoraro, Martina, Moschini, Marco, D’Andrea, David, Messina, Emanuele, Pisciotti, Lucia Martina, De Berardinis, Ettore, Sciarra, Alessandro, Panebianco, Valeria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6
_version_ 1784736668276752384
author Del Giudice, Francesco
Flammia, Rocco Simone
Pecoraro, Martina
Moschini, Marco
D’Andrea, David
Messina, Emanuele
Pisciotti, Lucia Martina
De Berardinis, Ettore
Sciarra, Alessandro
Panebianco, Valeria
author_facet Del Giudice, Francesco
Flammia, Rocco Simone
Pecoraro, Martina
Moschini, Marco
D’Andrea, David
Messina, Emanuele
Pisciotti, Lucia Martina
De Berardinis, Ettore
Sciarra, Alessandro
Panebianco, Valeria
author_sort Del Giudice, Francesco
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception up to May 2021. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp) were first estimated and subsequently pooled using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) modeling for both cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 to predict muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, n = 20 studies from 2019 to 2021 with n = 2477 patients by n = 53 genitourinary radiologists met the inclusion criteria. Pooled weighted Sn and Sp were 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.90) for cut-off ≥ 3 while 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.81) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96) for cut-off ≥ 4. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93) for cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of clinical characteristics nor cumulative reader’s experience while study design and radiological characteristics were found to influence the estimated outcome. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated excellent worldwide diagnostic performance of VI-RADS to determine pre-trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) staging. Our findings corroborate wide reliability of VI-RADS accuracy also between different centers with varying experience underling the importance that standardization and reproducibility of VI-RADS may confer to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative BCa discrimination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92370032022-06-29 The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations Del Giudice, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Pecoraro, Martina Moschini, Marco D’Andrea, David Messina, Emanuele Pisciotti, Lucia Martina De Berardinis, Ettore Sciarra, Alessandro Panebianco, Valeria World J Urol Invited Review PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception up to May 2021. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp) were first estimated and subsequently pooled using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) modeling for both cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 to predict muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, n = 20 studies from 2019 to 2021 with n = 2477 patients by n = 53 genitourinary radiologists met the inclusion criteria. Pooled weighted Sn and Sp were 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.90) for cut-off ≥ 3 while 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.81) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96) for cut-off ≥ 4. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93) for cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of clinical characteristics nor cumulative reader’s experience while study design and radiological characteristics were found to influence the estimated outcome. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated excellent worldwide diagnostic performance of VI-RADS to determine pre-trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) staging. Our findings corroborate wide reliability of VI-RADS accuracy also between different centers with varying experience underling the importance that standardization and reproducibility of VI-RADS may confer to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative BCa discrimination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9237003/ /pubmed/35294583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Invited Review
Del Giudice, Francesco
Flammia, Rocco Simone
Pecoraro, Martina
Moschini, Marco
D’Andrea, David
Messina, Emanuele
Pisciotti, Lucia Martina
De Berardinis, Ettore
Sciarra, Alessandro
Panebianco, Valeria
The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title_full The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title_fullStr The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title_short The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
title_sort accuracy of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (vi-rads): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6
work_keys_str_mv AT delgiudicefrancesco theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT flammiaroccosimone theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT pecoraromartina theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT moschinimarco theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT dandreadavid theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT messinaemanuele theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT pisciottiluciamartina theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT deberardinisettore theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT sciarraalessandro theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT panebiancovaleria theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT delgiudicefrancesco accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT flammiaroccosimone accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT pecoraromartina accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT moschinimarco accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT dandreadavid accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT messinaemanuele accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT pisciottiluciamartina accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT deberardinisettore accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT sciarraalessandro accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations
AT panebiancovaleria accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations