Cargando…
The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations
PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6 |
_version_ | 1784736668276752384 |
---|---|
author | Del Giudice, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Pecoraro, Martina Moschini, Marco D’Andrea, David Messina, Emanuele Pisciotti, Lucia Martina De Berardinis, Ettore Sciarra, Alessandro Panebianco, Valeria |
author_facet | Del Giudice, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Pecoraro, Martina Moschini, Marco D’Andrea, David Messina, Emanuele Pisciotti, Lucia Martina De Berardinis, Ettore Sciarra, Alessandro Panebianco, Valeria |
author_sort | Del Giudice, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception up to May 2021. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp) were first estimated and subsequently pooled using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) modeling for both cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 to predict muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, n = 20 studies from 2019 to 2021 with n = 2477 patients by n = 53 genitourinary radiologists met the inclusion criteria. Pooled weighted Sn and Sp were 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.90) for cut-off ≥ 3 while 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.81) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96) for cut-off ≥ 4. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93) for cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of clinical characteristics nor cumulative reader’s experience while study design and radiological characteristics were found to influence the estimated outcome. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated excellent worldwide diagnostic performance of VI-RADS to determine pre-trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) staging. Our findings corroborate wide reliability of VI-RADS accuracy also between different centers with varying experience underling the importance that standardization and reproducibility of VI-RADS may confer to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative BCa discrimination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9237003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92370032022-06-29 The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations Del Giudice, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Pecoraro, Martina Moschini, Marco D’Andrea, David Messina, Emanuele Pisciotti, Lucia Martina De Berardinis, Ettore Sciarra, Alessandro Panebianco, Valeria World J Urol Invited Review PURPOSE: To determine through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis the cumulative diagnostic performance of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VIRADS) to predict preoperative muscle-invasiveness among different institutions, readers, and optimal scoring accuracy thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception up to May 2021. Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp) were first estimated and subsequently pooled using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) modeling for both cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 to predict muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, n = 20 studies from 2019 to 2021 with n = 2477 patients by n = 53 genitourinary radiologists met the inclusion criteria. Pooled weighted Sn and Sp were 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.80–0.90) for cut-off ≥ 3 while 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.81) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96) for cut-off ≥ 4. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93) for cut-off ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of clinical characteristics nor cumulative reader’s experience while study design and radiological characteristics were found to influence the estimated outcome. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated excellent worldwide diagnostic performance of VI-RADS to determine pre-trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) staging. Our findings corroborate wide reliability of VI-RADS accuracy also between different centers with varying experience underling the importance that standardization and reproducibility of VI-RADS may confer to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative BCa discrimination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9237003/ /pubmed/35294583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Del Giudice, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Pecoraro, Martina Moschini, Marco D’Andrea, David Messina, Emanuele Pisciotti, Lucia Martina De Berardinis, Ettore Sciarra, Alessandro Panebianco, Valeria The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title | The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title_full | The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title_short | The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
title_sort | accuracy of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (vi-rads): an updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03969-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delgiudicefrancesco theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT flammiaroccosimone theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT pecoraromartina theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT moschinimarco theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT dandreadavid theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT messinaemanuele theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT pisciottiluciamartina theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT deberardinisettore theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT sciarraalessandro theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT panebiancovaleria theaccuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT delgiudicefrancesco accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT flammiaroccosimone accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT pecoraromartina accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT moschinimarco accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT dandreadavid accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT messinaemanuele accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT pisciottiluciamartina accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT deberardinisettore accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT sciarraalessandro accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations AT panebiancovaleria accuracyofvesicalimagingreportinganddatasystemviradsanupdatedcomprehensivemultiinstitutionalmultireaderssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisfromdiagnosticevidenceintofutureclinicalrecommendations |