Cargando…

Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment of goggles with iodophor solution and antibacterial hand sanitizer to reduce the fogging of goggles. METHODS: A total of 90 health care workers were divided into a control group (n = 30), an iodophor solution group (n =...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hongjiang, Ye, Xiaoqiong, He, Yue, Kong, Ping, Chen, Jing, Chen, Yunhua, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35940932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2022.06.004
_version_ 1784736673055113216
author Hongjiang, Ye
Xiaoqiong, He
Yue, Kong
Ping, Chen
Jing, Chen
Yunhua, Yu
author_facet Hongjiang, Ye
Xiaoqiong, He
Yue, Kong
Ping, Chen
Jing, Chen
Yunhua, Yu
author_sort Hongjiang, Ye
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment of goggles with iodophor solution and antibacterial hand sanitizer to reduce the fogging of goggles. METHODS: A total of 90 health care workers were divided into a control group (n = 30), an iodophor solution group (n = 30), and an antibacterial hand sanitizer group (n = 30). This study evaluated the degree of fogging of goggles and the light transmission, comfort, eye irritation, and the impact of goggles on the medical work of staff. RESULTS: The antibacterial hand sanitizer group had the lowest amount of goggle fogging and the most transparent view. Participants in the control group reported the worst light transmission and comfort level, followed by the iodophor solution group. In contrast, the goggles in the antibacterial hand sanitizer group had the best light transmission and comfort level. The iodophor solution group participants reported more eye irritation. Participants in the control group reported that the goggles severely impacted their medical work, with a less severe impact reported by the iodophor solution group. The antibacterial hand sanitizer group did not report any impact on their medical work. DISCUSSION: When the goggles were internally coated with antibacterial hand sanitizer solution (diluted 1:1 with distilled water), the antifog effect was significant. Moreover, the goggles treated with antibacterial hand sanitizer had a clearer field of vision, were reported as non-irritating to the eyes, and significantly improved the efficiency of COVID-19 health care workers, including emergency nurses and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92370212022-06-28 Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial Hongjiang, Ye Xiaoqiong, He Yue, Kong Ping, Chen Jing, Chen Yunhua, Yu J Emerg Nurs Research INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment of goggles with iodophor solution and antibacterial hand sanitizer to reduce the fogging of goggles. METHODS: A total of 90 health care workers were divided into a control group (n = 30), an iodophor solution group (n = 30), and an antibacterial hand sanitizer group (n = 30). This study evaluated the degree of fogging of goggles and the light transmission, comfort, eye irritation, and the impact of goggles on the medical work of staff. RESULTS: The antibacterial hand sanitizer group had the lowest amount of goggle fogging and the most transparent view. Participants in the control group reported the worst light transmission and comfort level, followed by the iodophor solution group. In contrast, the goggles in the antibacterial hand sanitizer group had the best light transmission and comfort level. The iodophor solution group participants reported more eye irritation. Participants in the control group reported that the goggles severely impacted their medical work, with a less severe impact reported by the iodophor solution group. The antibacterial hand sanitizer group did not report any impact on their medical work. DISCUSSION: When the goggles were internally coated with antibacterial hand sanitizer solution (diluted 1:1 with distilled water), the antifog effect was significant. Moreover, the goggles treated with antibacterial hand sanitizer had a clearer field of vision, were reported as non-irritating to the eyes, and significantly improved the efficiency of COVID-19 health care workers, including emergency nurses and providers. Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-09 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9237021/ /pubmed/35940932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2022.06.004 Text en © 2022 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research
Hongjiang, Ye
Xiaoqiong, He
Yue, Kong
Ping, Chen
Jing, Chen
Yunhua, Yu
Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effectiveness of 2 Pretreatment Methods in Antifogging of Goggles in a COVID-19 Isolation Ward: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of 2 pretreatment methods in antifogging of goggles in a covid-19 isolation ward: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35940932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2022.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT hongjiangye effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiaoqionghe effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuekong effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pingchen effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jingchen effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yunhuayu effectivenessof2pretreatmentmethodsinantifoggingofgogglesinacovid19isolationwardarandomizedcontrolledtrial