Cargando…

Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND: There were several limitations to the original HAS‐BLED (oHAS‐BLED) score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This trial studied the revised HAS‐BLED (rHAS‐BLED) score for predicting bleeding events in anticoagulated AF patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively recruited antic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Methavigul, Komsing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12709
_version_ 1784736750922366976
author Methavigul, Komsing
author_facet Methavigul, Komsing
author_sort Methavigul, Komsing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There were several limitations to the original HAS‐BLED (oHAS‐BLED) score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This trial studied the revised HAS‐BLED (rHAS‐BLED) score for predicting bleeding events in anticoagulated AF patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively recruited anticoagulated AF patients in the Central Chest Institute of Thailand between 2014 and 2021. The rHAS‐BLED score was oHAS‐BLED using the estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for abnormal renal function, SAMe‐TT(2)R(2) score of ≥3 for labile INR, and adding clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) into bleeding history. The outcome was major bleeding (MB) and/or CRNMB at 1‐year follow‐up visit. The outcome between both groups was compared by using the chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test. Receiver‐operating characteristics curve was used to analyze the discrimination performances of both scores and the results were illustrated by using c‐statistics. RESULTS: A total of 256 anticoagulated AF patients were enrolled. The average age was 73.6 ± 10.1 years. The average oHAS‐BLED and rHAS‐BLED scores were 1.7 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 1.2, respectively. Twenty patients in rHAS‐BLED ≥3 (15.9%) and 9 patients in rHAS‐BLED <3 (6.9%) experienced MB and/or CRNMB. The rHAS‐BLED score of ≥3 increased the bleeding risk with statistical significance (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.11–5.81, p = .04). The discriminative performance of the rHAS‐BLED score was illustrated with c‐statistics of 0.61 (95% CI 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The rHAS‐BLED score could predict bleeding events in anticoagulated AF patients. However, a larger study is needed to confirm these results in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92372982022-06-30 Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants Methavigul, Komsing J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: There were several limitations to the original HAS‐BLED (oHAS‐BLED) score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This trial studied the revised HAS‐BLED (rHAS‐BLED) score for predicting bleeding events in anticoagulated AF patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively recruited anticoagulated AF patients in the Central Chest Institute of Thailand between 2014 and 2021. The rHAS‐BLED score was oHAS‐BLED using the estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for abnormal renal function, SAMe‐TT(2)R(2) score of ≥3 for labile INR, and adding clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) into bleeding history. The outcome was major bleeding (MB) and/or CRNMB at 1‐year follow‐up visit. The outcome between both groups was compared by using the chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test. Receiver‐operating characteristics curve was used to analyze the discrimination performances of both scores and the results were illustrated by using c‐statistics. RESULTS: A total of 256 anticoagulated AF patients were enrolled. The average age was 73.6 ± 10.1 years. The average oHAS‐BLED and rHAS‐BLED scores were 1.7 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 1.2, respectively. Twenty patients in rHAS‐BLED ≥3 (15.9%) and 9 patients in rHAS‐BLED <3 (6.9%) experienced MB and/or CRNMB. The rHAS‐BLED score of ≥3 increased the bleeding risk with statistical significance (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.11–5.81, p = .04). The discriminative performance of the rHAS‐BLED score was illustrated with c‐statistics of 0.61 (95% CI 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The rHAS‐BLED score could predict bleeding events in anticoagulated AF patients. However, a larger study is needed to confirm these results in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9237298/ /pubmed/35785373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12709 Text en © 2022 The Author. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Methavigul, Komsing
Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title_full Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title_fullStr Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title_full_unstemmed Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title_short Revised HAS‐BLED score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
title_sort revised has‐bled score for bleeding prediction in atrial fibrillation patients with oral anticoagulants
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12709
work_keys_str_mv AT methavigulkomsing revisedhasbledscoreforbleedingpredictioninatrialfibrillationpatientswithoralanticoagulants